SalarySwishSalarySwish

Next Year

Created by: DFinn91
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 25, 2024
Published: Mar. 26, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
2$1,500,000
3$3,500,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,250,000
2$7,250,000
4$6,500,000
5$7,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Burroughs, Kyle
  2. Kunin, Luke [RFA Rights]
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (BUF)
3.
4.
SJS
  1. Lundkvist, Nils [RFA Rights]
5.
SJS
  1. Sheary, Conor
  2. 2025 4th round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$77,274,342$0$1,307,500$10,425,658
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
UFA
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
RFA
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Mar. 26 at 5:35 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,270
Likes: 3,700
San Jose isn’t trading multiple 2nds, young nhlers and prospects for older players
Mar. 26 at 5:37 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Why would the leafs downgrade two players for a 2nd?
Mar. 26 at 5:41 p.m.
#3
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 907
I like Ferraro's game as much if not more than Pettersson. Adding a 2nd and one the Sharks best and most NHL ready prospects to that is just crazy.

I like Liljegren but the 33rd overall pick is FAR too much for him.

Emberson has been fantastic when healthy. I'd prefer him over over Lundkqvist.

Tampa one I just can't understand. Getting the worse contract only to healthy scratch him
Mar. 26 at 5:55 p.m.
#4
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 1,393
Quoting: AStovetop
I like Ferraro's game as much if not more than Pettersson. Adding a 2nd and one the Sharks best and most NHL ready prospects to that is just crazy.

I like Liljegren but the 33rd overall pick is FAR too much for him.

Emberson has been fantastic when healthy. I'd prefer him over over Lundkqvist.

Tampa one I just can't understand. Getting the worse contract only to healthy scratch him


You might. But 32/32 NHL GMs don't. Including Dubas and Grier. So adding would be necessary. Pettersson is an underrated elite defensive dman that elevates everyone he plays with. I think that is actually approaching a fair trade, though probably reduce the 2nd to a 3rd. However, it makes zero sense from SJS perspective. And if PIT is trading Pettersson, it makes more sense to just get futures because roster players are almost guaranteed to be wasted on a rebuild.
pens1991 liked this.
Mar. 26 at 7:05 p.m.
#5
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 907
Quoting: jfkst1
You might. But 32/32 NHL GMs don't. Including Dubas and Grier. So adding would be necessary. Pettersson is an underrated elite defensive dman that elevates everyone he plays with. I think that is actually approaching a fair trade, though probably reduce the 2nd to a 3rd. However, it makes zero sense from SJS perspective. And if PIT is trading Pettersson, it makes more sense to just get futures because roster players are almost guaranteed to be wasted on a rebuild.


Pettersson is the better player right now no doubt, but I don't think it's as wide of a gap as many think it is between him and Ferraro though. And I said I like Ferraro's GAME better. I think his role as a player/leader is more needed to this Sharks team than Pettersson. Add that Pettersson's d-partners have almost exclusively been Karlsson, Letang, Petry (when he was still playing at a high level) and Marino. Ferraro's stats astronomically improve when he has a d-partner of similar caliber.

I agree, Ferraro + 3rd is probably Pettersson's value from an on-ice play perspective, but Ferraro is also a huge leader in the lockerroom. My point is they're somewhat close in value and role, so its a marginal upgrade. So to also give up what's practically a first and a borderline untouchable prospect is absolutely bonkers
See All