SalarySwishSalarySwish

Coyle

Created by: BeastMode5515
Team: 2018-19 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 24, 2018
Published: Nov. 24, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Bruins reported interest in Coyle. What would the return be?
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYR
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$64,724,001$774,000$745,000$14,775,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$916,667$916,667
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$872,500$872,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$675,000$675,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$747,500$747,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$789,167$789,167
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
RFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Nov. 24, 2018 at 2:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,045
Likes: 14,662
I would say an NHL forward on an ELC and either a prospect or a good draft pick.
GenXHockey liked this.
Nov. 24, 2018 at 2:36 p.m.
#2
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Bjork/Donato + 2nd is my usual go-to mark in these situations. I think Bruins fans are unhappy with either usually - either you want a better RW/3C, or you feel like you're giving up too much with the prospects/elc players. I think most teams overrate their young players though, and although a guy like Bjork show flashes of brilliance at times it might just never happen for the kid
Nov. 24, 2018 at 2:42 p.m.
#3
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Quoting: MelonVK
Bjork/Donato + 2nd is my usual go-to mark in these situations. I think Bruins fans are unhappy with either usually - either you want a better RW/3C, or you feel like you're giving up too much with the prospects/elc players. I think most teams overrate their young players though, and although a guy like Bjork show flashes of brilliance at times it might just never happen for the kid


Overpayment for Coyle. I want nothing to do with this guy. If he wasn't from Massachusetts, Bruins fans wouldn't even talk about him. He's a 6'3'' softie who would be a better producing Jimmy Hayes 2.0.
Gofnut999 liked this.
Nov. 24, 2018 at 2:44 p.m.
#4
BeastMode5515
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 416
Quoting: MelonVK
Bjork/Donato + 2nd is my usual go-to mark in these situations. I think Bruins fans are unhappy with either usually - either you want a better RW/3C, or you feel like you're giving up too much with the prospects/elc players. I think most teams overrate their young players though, and although a guy like Bjork show flashes of brilliance at times it might just never happen for the kid


Bjork has been our best forward besides the top 6, I don’t want to trade him

Quoting: BreKel
Overpayment for Coyle. I want nothing to do with this guy. If he wasn't from Massachusetts, Bruins fans wouldn't even talk about him. He's a 6'3'' softie who would be a better producing Jimmy Hayes 2.0.


This is extremely false. Both normal and advanced stats support him being a solid 2/3C option, I’m not sure where you’re getting this impression.
Nov. 24, 2018 at 3:00 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,223
Likes: 3,642
Wild are kind of stuck with Coyle for the rest of the season. He's a sell low guy currently, and anything coming back probably won't help them this year. Wild are a good (regular season at least) team again so futures isn't really much use to them. Moving him this offseason for picks/prospects is more likely.

Coyle+ for a better middle-6 RW/C is a more likely Coyle trade. Bos and MN don't really line up well as trade partners currently.
See All