SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gimme that Karlsson

Created by: ISeeDeadPeople
Team: 2018-19 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 19, 2018
Published: Jun. 19, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
1$900,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
Makar, Cale
3$950,000
4$3,450,000
Trades
1.
OTT
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Meloche, Nicolas
  3. Wilson, Colin
  4. 2018 3rd round pick (COL)
  5. 2019 1st round pick (COL)
  6. 2019 1st round pick (OTT)
2.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2019
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$80,000,000$58,888,095$0$1,982,500$21,111,905
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
UFA - 5
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$885,833$885,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 2
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$833,333$833,333
C
RFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,150,000$2,150,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,900,000$5,900,000
G
UFA - 1
Makar, Cale
$950,000$950,000
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 3
$1,450,000$1,450,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:10 a.m.
#1
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,982
Likes: 935
You know that's probably going to be a really good change at the 1st next year.

Karlsson is probably going to push for FA too.
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:12 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
hard pass on that EK deal, thats too much for the Avs to give up for him.

One o fthe best Dman in the league aside, you arent giving them more what Vegas offered for him while including that Ott 1st round pick in 2019. As soon as that pick is involved the price is seriously discounted
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:16 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 442
Likes: 43
Quoting: coga16
hard pass on that EK deal, thats too much for the Avs to give up for him.

One o fthe best Dman in the league aside, you arent giving them more what Vegas offered for him while including that Ott 1st round pick in 2019. As soon as that pick is involved the price is seriously discounted


I think that'd be an excellent incentive for OTT to deal with COL though. If the Sens think they're going to be competitive next year, they're as stupid as they seem. COL just happens to have the most valuable pick of OTT to deal with and OTT has the most valuable trade chip to move.
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:25 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: ISeeDeadPeople
I think that'd be an excellent incentive for OTT to deal with COL though. If the Sens think they're going to be competitive next year, they're as stupid as they seem. COL just happens to have the most valuable pick of OTT to deal with and OTT has the most valuable trade chip to move.


They dont have to add Avs 1st round pick or 3rd round pick. If the sens want to go info a full rebuild. Just give the Avs the 4th overall and they move Karlsson for the best deal to try to gain a 1st round pick next year.

Or they trade Karlsson to the Avs and get their 2019 1st and 3rd round picks back with Barrie to get the ball rolling. Wont be giving them any higher end Avs prospects to make this nightmare for the Sens to end
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:28 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 442
Likes: 43
Quoting: coga16
They dont have to add Avs 1st round pick or 3rd round pick. If the sens want to go info a full rebuild. Just give the Avs the 4th overall and they move Karlsson for the best deal to try to gain a 1st round pick next year.

Or they trade Karlsson to the Avs and get their 2019 1st and 3rd round picks back with Barrie to get the ball rolling. Wont be giving them any higher end Avs prospects to make this nightmare for the Sens to end


You'd be a ruthless GM. I hear you. I know COL values Kerfoot and Meloche but who knows where Dorion stands with them. Gotta figure they'd want prospects to rebuild with but maybe those two and subtract the 2019 COL 1st pick would suffice, for sure.
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:35 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: ISeeDeadPeople
You'd be a ruthless GM. I hear you. I know COL values Kerfoot and Meloche but who knows where Dorion stands with them. Gotta figure they'd want prospects to rebuild with but maybe those two and subtract the 2019 COL 1st pick would suffice, for sure.


Kerfoot I would hold onto. Meloche I would listen to. I think Otts 1st, Barrie, Meloche and Otts 3rd is more than fair considering their situation.
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:41 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 442
Likes: 43
Quoting: coga16
Kerfoot I would hold onto. Meloche I would listen to. I think Otts 1st, Barrie, Meloche and Otts 3rd is more than fair considering their situation.


Would it be fair to say Barrie would be replaceable simply because Karlsson is a far better version of how Tyson plays? Is that why you keep bringing him up?
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:43 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 241
Likes: 21
Sakic is comfortably seated in the boss's chair. If OTT absolutely want their 1st rounder back, they will have to pay a king ransom. This pick is worth gold, especially because OTT may be the worst team in 2019 and that #1 prospect will be Jack Hugues. No way I give anything more. For me it would be like: You want the pick back? It's Karlsson with a contract extension agreement. Or it's Mark Stone plus the 22nd pick overall (from PIT). That's king ransom. Sakic doesn't have to move. In the worst case, OTT will choose to leave the 4th overall this year to close the Duchene deal immediately. Or it may be Jack Hugues next year :-)
Jun. 19, 2018 at 11:57 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: ISeeDeadPeople
Would it be fair to say Barrie would be replaceable simply because Karlsson is a far better version of how Tyson plays? Is that why you keep bringing him up?


Dont think he is going to be part of the Avs long term plans and if they can extend a much better Erik Karlsson, thats a huge upgrade on the blue line without sacrificing the offense that comes from Barrie.

Also you take the 5.5m for Barrie and put that towards Karlssons new contract. Makes sense long term
ISeeDeadPeople liked this.
Jun. 19, 2018 at 1:17 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 2
I get the EK love from every fanbase, but giving up that much for a player who is likely to go UFA next year doesn't really make sense. Avs seem like they are on a pretty good path, with lots of assets that can be deployed in the right trades when the time comes. This use of those assets just doesn't feel like it betters the organization long-term. I'm not feeling it, at all.
Jun. 19, 2018 at 1:18 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 442
Likes: 43
Quoting: ELNOSHOW
I get the EK love from every fanbase, but giving up that much for a player who is likely to go UFA next year doesn't really make sense. Avs seem like they are on a pretty good path, with lots of assets that can be deployed in the right trades when the time comes. This use of those assets just doesn't feel like it betters the organization long-term. I'm not feeling it, at all.


The idea was to more so keep hold of OTT's own 1st rounders. Knowing they're going to suck, OTT needs as many top 5 picks they can muster. An extension is assumed, I just forgot to put it in the details.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll