Quoting: Jacketsman61
Palhal, you cannot spin the facts to make it look good. In this scenario, you are already still over the cap. Yeah you could make some cost saving moves to get under the cap, sure. However, you don’t seem to be accounting for the loss of Gardiner. The guy had 52 point last season most of those were assist. Which means he generated a lot of offense. You are assuming a lot to think those d-men can just step right in and play. Defense is the hardest position to break in the NHL. Another fact is that division was lousy last year. However, a lot of those teams are getting better. Which means they will need to have solid defense to help keep the pressure off Andersen. Toronto is going to be in cap hell. Unless they make some proactive moves now, Tavares will cost them. Toronto better win the cup next season or things will get interesting.
Yes, Gardiner is gone. That's an easy decision already made be me....and I'm sure by the Leafs. Gardiner is 28 years old and at his bonehead peak. If he a great year he certainly prices himself out of the Leaf cap. If he plays like himself, the Leafs have to move away from and go for other players with potential. I don't know why folks discount the excellent play of Dermot and I think. Borgman is NHL ready too.
It's similar to the Columbus and there Bob situation. Even if he is worth of 8m next season, and might be offered it by another club. maybe CBJ declines and goes with a younger cheaper tandem.
Sorry I disagree with your definition of cap hell. Having too many good players that deserve bigger contracts.....is not cap hell. Then someone has to be traded for fair value to get cap compliant. The Wings is the best example of cap hell, too many non performers who are not tradable.
Yes other teams might be better, but why can't the Leafs too. Going into this year, have loss JVR, Komarov, Polak and Bozak. Replaced with Tavares, Johnson, Kapanen, Borgman/Ozhikvov and still young guys that can be better. Hardly a bad situation at all.