SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

MTL trade, fair/who adds?

Created by: J2W
Team: 2018-19 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 2, 2018
Published: Jul. 2, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
LAK
  1. Alzner, Karl
  2. Byron, Paul
Additional Details:
LA gets a cheap 20 goal LW, who likely slots in on the 2nd line. Also get a slightly cheaper bad contract taking Alzner for Phaneuf. Phaneuf puts up more points, Alzner had better possesion numbers despite fewer OZ starts.
MTL
  1. Phaneuf, Dion
  2. Thompson, Nate
Additional Details:
MTL gets out of a bad contract 1 year sooner, Alzner 4 left Phaneuf 3. at the cost of a bit of cap space.
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
Termination Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2020
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2021
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$79,500,000$69,269,281$0$1,700,000$10,230,719
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
$1,166,667$1,166,667
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,636,364$2,636,364
RW, C
UFA - 4
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$800,000$800,000
LW
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 1
$2,900,000$2,900,000
G
UFA - 5
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
$1,025,000$1,025,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,893,750$1,893,750
LD
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 2
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 2, 2018 at 8:24 p.m.
#1
Who adds what?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 13,677
Likes: 2,703
With MTL building slowly through the draft, being done sooner with the ghosts of free agency past should be appealing.

I doubt they're particularly looking to move Byron, and I think they're probably more interested in adding picks coming back than in getting another big salary for two years, that doesn't help them reubild at all.

Alzner for Phaneuf? Okay... you win on possession and cap hit. They win on points, nastiness, and term. If the total money is similar, they shrug it off.... except that Alzner because their de-facto top pair guy when Weber got hurt and his partner put up a career year, while Phaneuf's offense might not help anybody's offense, so right there, they want some sort of a pick to get that done.

Trading Byron? Okay. Throw in some picks.

Accepting Nate Thompson? Okay. Throw in some picks.

Their divisional rivals in Toronto just signed John Tavares and they have signed nobody. Team is not that excited about adding points or salaries at all. They're going to draft in the lottery either way, but adding a few more picks could brighten their future.
Jul. 2, 2018 at 8:28 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
I think this is a fair trade for both sides
Jul. 2, 2018 at 8:34 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,559
Likes: 6,150
Kings need Nate Thompson to center the 4th line. Change Thompson to Clifford and I could see it working.
Jul. 2, 2018 at 9:35 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 473
Likes: 233
Quoting: Eli
With MTL building slowly through the draft, being done sooner with the ghosts of free agency past should be appealing.

I doubt they're particularly looking to move Byron, and I think they're probably more interested in adding picks coming back than in getting another big salary for two years, that doesn't help them reubild at all.

Alzner for Phaneuf? Okay... you win on possession and cap hit. They win on points, nastiness, and term. If the total money is similar, they shrug it off.... except that Alzner because their de-facto top pair guy when Weber got hurt and his partner put up a career year, while Phaneuf's offense might not help anybody's offense, so right there, they want some sort of a pick to get that done.

Trading Byron? Okay. Throw in some picks.

Accepting Nate Thompson? Okay. Throw in some picks.

Their divisional rivals in Toronto just signed John Tavares and they have signed nobody. Team is not that excited about adding points or salaries at all. They're going to draft in the lottery either way, but adding a few more picks could brighten their future.


Thompson was also more to give LA a bit more cap relief, and I figured Phaneuf for Alzner was in MTL's favour so Byron was added to help offset that. But if Phaneuf for Alzner is relatively fair what kind of picks would you add to even the trade out?
Jul. 2, 2018 at 10:08 p.m.
#5
Who adds what?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 13,677
Likes: 2,703
Quoting: J2W
Thompson was also more to give LA a bit more cap relief, and I figured Phaneuf for Alzner was in MTL's favour so Byron was added to help offset that. But if Phaneuf for Alzner is relatively fair what kind of picks would you add to even the trade out?


As a Caps fans I always saw Alzner as the guy who stayed back and made Carlson's offense possible. This year Orpik played that role for half the year, then Djoos for a bit, then Kempny.... but it's still a role that takes work, and in spite of MTL's fans' low opinions of him, I think Alzner and Petry were one of the few things that really clicked for the Habs last year.

Nate Thompson is 33 and has broken ten goals three times? But not lately. Paul Byron is 29, has the same cap hit, and has broken twenty goals in both the last two years and had eleven the year before that?

So Thompson is just kind of thrown in there.

My guess is that they don't want to open up that level of yard sale just yet, but at the trade deadline, it could happen for a couple of 2nds?
Jul. 2, 2018 at 10:26 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 473
Likes: 233
Quoting: Eli
As a Caps fans I always saw Alzner as the guy who stayed back and made Carlson's offense possible. This year Orpik played that role for half the year, then Djoos for a bit, then Kempny.... but it's still a role that takes work, and in spite of MTL's fans' low opinions of him, I think Alzner and Petry were one of the few things that really clicked for the Habs last year.


I actually like Alzner, I just think he has about 1-1.5 million too high of a cap hit.
Eli liked this.
Jul. 2, 2018 at 10:33 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,593
Likes: 6,733
If MTL was serious about trying to compete, yeah sure I guess but they are quietly rebuilding. They don't need to do any of this and simply keeping Alzner and trading Byron at the TDL for picks makes more sense.
Jul. 2, 2018 at 10:43 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 473
Likes: 233
Quoting: F50marco
If MTL was serious about trying to compete, yeah sure I guess but they are quietly rebuilding. They don't need to do any of this and simply keeping Alzner and trading Byron at the TDL for picks makes more sense.

Phaneuf isn't going to improve MTL much, certainly not enough to offset the loss of Byron. What this trade does do for Montreal is, at the cost of 625k in cap space for the next 3 seasons, get 4.625 million in cap space off the books a season sooner. Maybe just Alzner for Phaneuf straight up would work.
Jul. 2, 2018 at 11:53 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,593
Likes: 6,733
Quoting: J2W
Phaneuf isn't going to improve MTL much, certainly not enough to offset the loss of Byron. What this trade does do for Montreal is, at the cost of 625k in cap space for the next 3 seasons, get 4.625 million in cap space off the books a season sooner. Maybe just Alzner for Phaneuf straight up would work.


Phaneuf can man a PP at least. Alzner is a PK and that's it. Im not trying to pump Phaneuf too much here, he;s getting older but I'd gladly pay any extra 625K for one year less of Alzner, to get Dion.

Regardless as I said, this is a moot point. Habs gain nothing from slightly upgrading their defense but losing Byron in the process and they are retooling so all they need to do is show up and lose games for them to eventually get better.
Jul. 3, 2018 at 12:22 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 473
Likes: 233
Quoting: F50marco
Phaneuf can man a PP at least. Alzner is a PK and that's it. Im not trying to pump Phaneuf too much here, he;s getting older but I'd gladly pay any extra 625K for one year less of Alzner, to get Dion.

Regardless as I said, this is a moot point. Habs gain nothing from slightly upgrading their defense but losing Byron in the process and they are retooling so all they need to do is show up and lose games for them to eventually get better.


Weber and Petry are the more likely options on the PP. I don't see Phaneuf bringing much to the Habs, which is why I would take him over Alzner. Minimal, if any, overall improvement and a bad contract off the books sooner. As I said if it could be done without Byron being included, or LA throwing in picks for Byron, even better, but getting out from a bad contract a full season sooner is useful.
Jul. 3, 2018 at 12:34 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,593
Likes: 6,733
Quoting: J2W
Weber and Petry are the more likely options on the PP. I don't see Phaneuf bringing much to the Habs, which is why I would take him over Alzner. Minimal, if any, overall improvement and a bad contract off the books sooner. As I said if it could be done without Byron being included, or LA throwing in picks for Byron, even better, but getting out from a bad contract a full season sooner is useful.


Whose going to play on the opposite side of Weber and Petry on that PP? That's where Phaneuf would come in. Anyways this is a redundant debate. Im open to either option but if Byron is involved, we need picks coming back or no deal. Getting out of Alzners final year of his contract is pointless if we don't have players to spend that extra money on. Yeah its useful to have sure but its not worth sacrificing Byron and since the above offer makes no mention of picks, there really isn't any point to the Habs doing this.
Jul. 3, 2018 at 12:44 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 473
Likes: 233
Quoting: F50marco
Whose going to play on the opposite side of Weber and Petry on that PP? That's where Phaneuf would come in. Anyways this is a redundant debate. Im open to either option but if Byron is involved, we need picks coming back or no deal. Getting out of Alzners final year of his contract is pointless if we don't have players to spend that extra money on. Yeah its useful to have sure but its not worth sacrificing Byron and since the above offer makes no mention of picks, there really isn't any point to the Habs doing this.


1st PP is likely Domi, Gallagher, Pacioretty, Drouin and Weber. 2nd PP is something along the lines of Danault, Scherbak, Shaw, Petry and either Armia or Hudon. It's not just cap space but the roster spot that opens up, Rielly showed 2nd pairing potential last season, and I hope Mete can be a 2nd pairing guy, leaving Alzner as a 4.625 million cap hit on the 3rd pair. Again I would love to be able to just do Alzner for Phaneuf, then get some picks for Byron, I just wasn't sure how highly valued Dion was and if the Byron/Thompson swap was needed to balance it out.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll