Edited Jul. 26, 2018 at 2:20 p.m.
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Uh what? Why is Washington giving up the better pick? Holtby is over 3 years younger, better, and coming off a great Cup winning performance. So it would be Holtby for Dubnyk++.
Quoting: staytru20
Probably a good spot for a conditional pick, but there needs to be more coming back for Washington for sure.
This is why:
"Dubnyk, 32, has three years left on a deal that pays him $4.333 million annually. Since Jan. 15, 2015, Dubnyk leads the NHL with 231 games played and 20 shutouts, is tied for first with a .923 save percentage, is second with 134 wins and second with a 2.26 goals-against average." - Michael Russo,
The Athletic
Also, Dubnyk would save Washington almost $2M in cap space. I think Holtby being better is very arguable.
Edit: I changed it to a 1 for 1 swap. I still think Dubnyk is better and the stats show that in my comment from our beat writer, but Holtby being younger has value.
Edit 2: For context, here is Holtby's summed stats from the past 3 seasons: 183 games played, 124 games won, 12 shut outs, .918 save percentage, and 2.39 GAA according to hockeyreference. Dubnyk has better stats than this, hence my opinion that Dubnyk is better. But again, Holtby is 3 years younger, which holds value.