SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Plans for future - trades with TOR and NJ

Created by: justaBoss
Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2018
Published: Sep. 16, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,800,000
2$825,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
2$850,000
2$850,000
1$800,000
2$850,000
2$1,250,000
2$850,000
4$3,750,000
4$3,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
8$11,500,000
1$800,000
1$1,000,000
Marleau, Patrick
1$1,562,500
4$6,000,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Marleau, Patrick ($3,125,000 retained)
  2. 2020 6th round pick (TOR)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
RFA Calvin Pickard
TOR
  1. Braun, Justin
  2. Dell, Aaron
2.
SJS
  1. 2020 6th round pick (NJD)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
RFA Miles Wood
NJD
  1. Dillon, Brenden
  2. Karlsson, Melker
  3. 2021 4th round pick (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. 2019 7th round pick (BOS)
CAR
  1. Marleau, Patrick
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Money saving action
4.
SJS
    Patrick Marleau (50% retained also by Carolina).
    Salary paid as such:
    - TOR: $3,125,000
    - CAR: $1,562,500
    - SJ: $1,562,500
    CAR
    1. 2019 7th round pick (BOS)
    Additional Details:
    CAR gets the 2020 3rd round pick from SJ as compensation for helding part of Marleau's salary.
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NJD
    2021
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    2022
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$82,000,000$79,714,084$660,750$0$2,285,916
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Kane, Evander
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Couture, Logan
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 8
    Hertl, Tomas
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Wood, Miles
    $2,800,000$2,800,000
    LW
    UFA - 3
    Pavelski, Joe
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Labanc, Kevin
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Marleau, Patrick
    $1,562,500$1,562,500
    Thornton, Joe
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Meier, Timo
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    Sörensen, Marcus
    $800,000$800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Suomela, Antti
    $850,000$850,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Goodrow, Barclay
    $800,000$800,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Letunov, Maxim
    $850,000$850,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Gambrell, Dylan
    $850,000$850,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Karlsson, Erik
    $11,500,000$11,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 8
    Jones, Martin
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Ryan, Joakim
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Burns, Brent
    $5,280,000$5,280,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Merkley, Ryan
    $894,167$894,167
    RD
    UFA - 4
    Pickard, Calvin
    $800,000$800,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Gravel, Kevin
    $700,000$700,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Wood, Kyle
    $825,000$825,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 8:12 p.m.
    #1
    CJ01
    CJ01
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 1,421
    Likes: 29
    I think both the Devils and leafs would accept these trades. However, I think I'm the leafs trade you could take out the goalies. But it's just a small thing obviously and as a devils fan I love the trade it gives us a much needed Dman to play with Vatenan.
    justaBoss liked this.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 8:24 p.m.
    #2
    GenXHockey
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: YoungGM
    I think both the Devils and leafs would accept these trades. However, I think I'm the leafs trade you could take out the goalies. But it's just a small thing obviously and as a devils fan I love the trade it gives us a much needed Dman to play with Vatenan.


    Leafs say no, marleau says no... you are trading someone with a full NMC twice!!

    Leafs can not replace marleau for 3m so the trade makes no sense.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 8:30 p.m.
    #3
    justaBoss
    Thread Starter
    What in tarnation
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,715
    Likes: 31,451
    Quoting: Jamiepo
    Leafs say no, marleau says no... you are trading someone with a full NMC twice!!

    Leafs can not replace marleau for 3m so the trade makes no sense.


    Well to be fair, don't think Marleau wouldn't refuse waiving for San Jose, since he's played there most of his career. And the trade is just to move a part of his salary - he wouldn't be a single hour in Canes roster. Kinda like the Brassard trade where OTT traded him first to Vegas in order to make them retain part of his salary...

    But you may be right... TOR might not have the cap space to do this.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 8:35 p.m.
    #4
    GenXHockey
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 21,157
    Likes: 10,700
    Quoting: BurgerBoss
    Well to be fair, don't think Marleau wouldn't refuse waiving for San Jose, since he's played there most of his career. And the trade is just to move a part of his salary - he wouldn't be a single hour in Canes roster. Kinda like the Brassard trade where OTT traded him first to Vegas in order to make them retain part of his salary...

    But you may be right... TOR might not have the cap space to do this.


    Didn’t even see that trade on the bottom, no you can not do that. It is called cap circumvention and is prohibited. And no marleau is not going back to Sam Jose. He signed a 3 year NMC contract. He will be a leaf till then.
    palhal liked this.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 8:42 p.m.
    #5
    palhal
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,579
    Likes: 22,702
    For not recognizing what NMC signifies to Marleau.....and it means among other things Not Moving (to) Carolina.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 8:53 p.m.
    #6
    Smitty426
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 6,827
    Likes: 1,977
    Quoting: YoungGM
    I think both the Devils and leafs would accept these trades. However, I think I'm the leafs trade you could take out the goalies. But it's just a small thing obviously and as a devils fan I love the trade it gives us a much needed Dman to play with Vatenan.


    Im not giving up Woods
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 9:23 p.m.
    #7
    justaBoss
    Thread Starter
    What in tarnation
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,715
    Likes: 31,451
    Quoting: Jamiepo
    Didn’t even see that trade on the bottom, no you can not do that. It is called cap circumvention and is prohibited. And no marleau is not going back to Sam Jose. He signed a 3 year NMC contract. He will be a leaf till then.


    Is that so? Didn't know that. Live and learn, I guess.
    GenXHockey liked this.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 9:28 p.m.
    #8
    SirCharles
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 306
    Likes: 65
    I agree that the Marleau trade is a no go from the leafs side of things and I doubt he would waive his no-trade regardless even if it was to SJ because I'm pretty sure once the no-trade has been waived it would no longer exist meaning if he did allow a trade to SJ they could trade him again if they wanted to.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 9:35 p.m.
    #9
    justaBoss
    Thread Starter
    What in tarnation
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,715
    Likes: 31,451
    Quoting: SirCharles
    I agree that the Marleau trade is a no go from the leafs side of things and I doubt he would waive his no-trade regardless even if it was to SJ because I'm pretty sure once the no-trade has been waived it would no longer exist meaning if he did allow a trade to SJ they could trade him again if they wanted to.


    Well this AGM is made for 2019-20 season when Marleau is on the last year of his contract so it's basically pointless for Sharks to trade him again...
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 11:09 p.m.
    #10
    CJ01
    CJ01
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2017
    Posts: 1,421
    Likes: 29
    Quoting: Smitty426
    Im not giving up Woods


    Why not. Yes he good but we have more skilled kids in the system. (Speers, Quenville, McLoed, Anderson) we could get something good for him like a Dman. Besides I think Seattle would take him anyways.
    Sep. 16, 2018 at 11:16 p.m.
    #11
    Smitty426
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 6,827
    Likes: 1,977
    This team had no secondary scorung
    Look how good his #s are 5v5
    Lets take a player who made leaps and bounds from the previous year to get a 3-4 d man
    No thanks
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll