SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

EK65 LONG TERM

Created by: brainman1000
Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 20, 2018
Published: Sep. 20, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This is why EK long term extension is not going to happen in SJ
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$11,000,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
11$81,000,000$61,067,417$660,750$0$19,932,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,635,000$1,635,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
UFA - 8

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 20, 2018 at 11:22 a.m.
#1
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 932
At some point, SJ will need to reshuffle, or retool on the fly, but I don't think this team gives up on Karlsson just after 1 season without a fight for a new deal. PS, the new deal cannot be signed before this season's trade deadline if they want to extend him for 8 years.
wojme liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 11:36 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Rumor has it that Karlsson is seeking closer to McDavid money, Pretty sure he's looking at more then $11 million per.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 11:46 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 5
Quoting: Larkinisking
Rumor has it that Karlsson is seeking closer to McDavid money, Pretty sure he's looking at more then $11 million per.


And that would make the situation even worse for SJ. With the few players they already have under contract for next season, signing EK to a contract that large would leave them with even less money to fill their roster with.

Quoting: MG1986
At some point, SJ will need to reshuffle, or retool on the fly, but I don't think this team gives up on Karlsson just after 1 season without a fight for a new deal. PS, the new deal cannot be signed before this season's trade deadline if they want to extend him for 8 years.


I'm sure they would love to re-sign him, but I don't think they can keep him around without dumping a few of the contracts they already have in place next year.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 11:51 a.m.
#4
Sports and Tacos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 601
As a Sens Fan, I want him to resign for the extra picks!

But I can't see him doing that.. Especially with the aging D-core and their all in mentality (which is good short term, but will be a problem in 3-4 years)!

I think he's happy to be their this season because the San Jose have legitimate shot at the cup... but moves on at the end of the season!
Sep. 20, 2018 at 11:56 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 5
Quoting: ThatGuy
As a Sens Fan, I want him to resign for the extra picks!

But I can't see him doing that.. Especially with the aging D-core and their all in mentality (which is good short term, but will be a problem in 3-4 years)!

I think he's happy to be their this season because the San Jose have legitimate shot at the cup... but moves on at the end of the season!


SJ is definitely going all in this year. Next year, though, I don't see any way they can afford him unless they either live with having no depth, or move some of the few players they already have under contract in order to clear cap space. Either way their depth will suffer.
ThatGuy liked this.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 12:04 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 386
Likes: 133
He will not sign in SJ, their window is going to shut very soon with their aging Vets and lack of depth. He will go to FA and get 7 years at McDavid money with an up and coming team that has the space.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 12:18 p.m.
#7
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 932
Quoting: brainman1000
And that would make the situation even worse for SJ. With the few players they already have under contract for next season, signing EK to a contract that large would leave them with even less money to fill their roster with.



I'm sure they would love to re-sign him, but I don't think they can keep him around without dumping a few of the contracts they already have in place next year.


The fact that Doug Wilson was able to swap Mike Hoffman nearly instantly after acquiring for more of a return then he gave up originally acquiring him tells me that SJ has a devious GM capable of making pretty much anything work. I'm not a Sharks fan, but I find it hard to believe they will be letting Karlsson go without a fight. That may mean moving pieces, but I think this competitive team will stay competitive regardless of any extension given to Karlsson.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 12:30 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 5
Quoting: MG1986
The fact that Doug Wilson was able to swap Mike Hoffman nearly instantly after acquiring for more of a return then he gave up originally acquiring him tells me that SJ has a devious GM capable of making pretty much anything work. I'm not a Sharks fan, but I find it hard to believe they will be letting Karlsson go without a fight. That may mean moving pieces, but I think this competitive team will stay competitive regardless of any extension given to Karlsson.


He would certainly have to get very creative and make a few sacrifices, but the problem that will still be there is lack of depth. They are going to have a lot of roster spots to fill next year.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 2:16 p.m.
#9
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 927
As a Sharks fan, this is a serious concern of mine. If Jumbo doesn't resign, that leaves 5m for the Sharks to possible give Karlsson 4.5m of to get him to 11m. I heard part of the OTT contract they offered he didn't like was not enough signing bonus compensation. The Sharks owner is loaded, but I'm not sure how he feels about signing bonuses.

There is still the concern of signing Pavelski, Meier, Labanc, and others.

The reality is, DW often gets players on fairly good deals, but he has a lot of money locked up right now and less flexibility. However, if the cap increases to say 82m and we offload Dillon and/or Braun I think we could potentially be okay.
Sep. 20, 2018 at 3:54 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 5
Quoting: goodfella
As a Sharks fan, this is a serious concern of mine. If Jumbo doesn't resign, that leaves 5m for the Sharks to possible give Karlsson 4.5m of to get him to 11m. I heard part of the OTT contract they offered he didn't like was not enough signing bonus compensation. The Sharks owner is loaded, but I'm not sure how he feels about signing bonuses.

There is still the concern of signing Pavelski, Meier, Labanc, and others.

The reality is, DW often gets players on fairly good deals, but he has a lot of money locked up right now and less flexibility. However, if the cap increases to say 82m and we offload Dillon and/or Braun I think we could potentially be okay.


Offloading Dillon and/or Braun may still not allow enough space to fill all of the slots and maintain depth.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll