eh. Krug is ok still think RNH would need another small piece but pretty close.

sorry meant to do 4 stars and I pressed on 2 LOL

I like the Heinen for Anderson trade. Gives the Bruins a right handed RW for lines 2/3 that brings a heavier game than Heinen. Something the Bruins don't have in the top 9 outside of Backes.

But just wait, you're going to hear the arguments about Heinen being a 50 point player and Anderson being a 30 point player.

I think these are pretty solid in terms of value. Well done.

You're going to get some hate though.

What's happen with Josh Anderson? Is he on the trade block? Many trades suggestions about him...

I could live with this. ??

The Krug trade is great. Leave it at that and it's a five star.

The Anderson trade is a hot steaming pile of garbage

Cehlarik has 31 goals in 84 AHL games, can play either wing, is NHl ready. No room in Boston. Have you seen EDM wings? He’d be on the top 6 there.

I'm just not sold on Heinen. I think he is good but disappears too often. Josh Anderson is a true RW'er which the Bruins need and is noticeable when not producing points. I think Anderson brings more to the table than Heinen does for the Bruins.

All heinen does is win every battle, and rarely make mistakes. He had a really good offensive year last year, and yes, has come out of the gate a bit slow this season. The reason so many fans say they aren't sold on him is because he isn't fLashy. Whatever, the puck ends up in the net. Josh Anderson is garbage compared to heinen. He's a fourth liner

I've yet to find a single person who can bring any legitimate reason that Anderson for Heinen is a good deal for Boston. Heinen is the better player between the two, so why even make the deal?

What more does he bring? It's certainly not production because Heinen has him beat. The only thing Anderson does more than Heinen is hit. Wasn't Anderson just demoted to the 4th line?

Because plenty of B’s fans think bigger is better. Big Bad Bruins and all. Hell there is still a large chunk of idiots that want Lucic back.

I’d prefer talent, but i’m funny that way.

Jax would have to add a pick. But i can sort of understand considering Bjork and Donato are similar type of players. A Josh Anderson/Brett Ritchie type wouldn’t hurt.

Still would not do it, if they did i would not scream bloody murder. Worse moves have been made.

I wouldn't even say that Bjork/Donato are similar players. Bjork is more of a complete player that can hurt you in multiple ways. Donato as of right now is going going to beat you one way and that's putting pucks in the net. I've said it before, but IMO, Bjork is our best young forward after Pastrnak.

Imagine that. He was demoted and still has more points than Heinen this year. I know its only 5 games but Heinen has been easily Boston's worst player to start the season.

Agreed, I really though he’d need to knock the rust off and toughen up a bit in the AHL. I was wrong. Outside of the big 4 (first line and Mac) he and Grizz have been the 2 best players so far.

All of 3 goals....WOW!

I notice you just happened to avoid the part of my post asking what more he brings. Guess I'll just take that as sign of what more he brings.

If anyone is going to help with the secondary scoring, it'll be Bjork. Personally I'd like to see he and Donato up with Krejci. Move Nordstrom back to #4LW and let Heinen/DeBrusk play with Backes

Marchand - Bergeron - Pastrnak
Donato - Krejci - Bjork
DeBrusk - Backes - Heinen
Nordstrom - Kuraly - Wagner

Brings the exact same things as Heinen just with more tenacity. Let's just wait and see on Heinen. I hope he turns it around. I like him, I just think Anderson is more effective, especially considering he is a natural RW'er. Bruins have too many left handed wingers in Heinen, Debrusk, Bjork, Donato. One of these guys (not Debrusk) should be moved to upgrade line 2.

See what you don't understand is that's your opinion. You can't just make a statement saying Heinen is better because he has more skill. It's about preference and it's called armchair GM for a reason, you show how you would like the roster to look and what potential moves can be made.

So just because you prefer Heinen over Anderson, doesn't mean this trade is terrible in the eyes of others.

I don't think the Bruins need to become a team of pure physicality but I do think an addition of it in their top 6 or top 9 would benefit the team granted that physical player is fast enough and has the ability to finish plays around the net. The reason for a trade with Heinen is the Bruins have a glut of young left handed wingers and if you are willing to diversify the types of players you have on your roster, then this trade makes sense. If you would rather have 3 left handed wingers and sit one out each game because none of them have shown the ability to play the right side then no this trade does not make sense.

So if you do not agree with that position, then that is your choice but you can't say there is no valid reason to make this trade.

Dumbass Kypreos is lying saying hes unhappy because he played one game on the 4th line.

I actually never said this



I actually don't have a preference. Both have their pros and cons, but at this juncture, Heinen is worth more than Anderson is.



I'm all for more physicality, but you need to bring top 6 or top 9 production with you. If you're not bring the offense then you're a 4th liner.



So because we have a lot of young LH winger we need to sell low on them? Heinen for Anderson straight up is a bad deal for Boston. Throw some other pieces around it, and maybe it's a different story.