SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

deadline deal and playoff lines if everyone is healthy

Created by: sebski
Team: 2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 2, 2018
Published: Dec. 2, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
assuming they have a fire sale at the deadline.
Trades
TOR
  1. Martinez, Alec ($1,000,000 retained)
LAK
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Marincin, Martin
  3. 2019 1st round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$73,786,111$2,550,000$5,400,000$5,713,889

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,277,778$10,277,778
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$650,000$650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 2, 2018 at 9:51 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 2,389
Why did dermott get sent down? Wasn't he playing well
Dec. 2, 2018 at 9:52 p.m.
#2
Leafs_Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 78
Likes: 10
Never trade your first round pick ever if you only have one. Solely for that, I wouldn't do that trade.
Dec. 2, 2018 at 9:53 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
sebski
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 72
Likes: 8
Quoting: arafay
Why did dermott get sent down? Wasn't he playing well


basically since they signed willy they had 1 too many contracts and need to waive someone or trade someone. since dermott can be sent down without the need to clear waivers it buys them time until their game on tuesday to make a trade or send down one of holl marincin or gauthier.
arafay liked this.
Dec. 2, 2018 at 9:54 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
sebski
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 72
Likes: 8
Quoting: acalza
Never trade your first round pick ever if you only have one. Solely for that, I wouldn't do that trade.


since when?? pittsburg has had like 2 first rounders in the last 8 years and they seem to be doing farely decent. 1st rounders are not as valuable as a solid top 4 d man to the leafs.
Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 2,306
Edited Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:17 p.m.
A rental Dmen would be a better option, NYR - McQuaid?, Stl - Bouwmester?, Dall - Polak?, Det - Kronwall? Chi - Ruuta?
Ryminister_27 liked this.
Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:04 p.m.
#6
GT15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 20
Likes: 2
Dermott will be back up by Tuesday's game, they do have to make a roster move though. They have to make a trade or place someone on waivers.
Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:05 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 2,389
Quoting: sebski
basically since they signed willy they had 1 too many contracts and need to waive someone or trade someone. since dermott can be sent down without the need to clear waivers it buys them time until their game on tuesday to make a trade or send down one of holl marincin or gauthier.


that's what I thought, thanks
Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:28 p.m.
#8
Jangle29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 832
Quoting: acalza
Never trade your first round pick ever if you only have one. Solely for that, I wouldn't do that trade.


Sooner or later you go for it so get ready to lose your mind when it happens. One of those years to go for it would classify as a year when you are hovering around 1st place overall
Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:29 p.m.
#9
Jangle29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 832
I prefer paying a bit more for Faulk 50% retained. Allows to keep him next season and even extend when Marleau is off the books
Dec. 2, 2018 at 10:32 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
sebski
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 72
Likes: 8
Quoting: Jangle29
I prefer paying a bit more for Faulk 50% retained. Allows to keep him next season and even extend when Marleau is off the books


the problem with faulk is carolina would need either johnsson or kapanen in the deal as they arnt looking for picks and prospects they want young forwards who can play. I would be ok with doing kappy and like a second or third or johnsson and a first for faulk 50% retained but if the leafs were to go all in this year i would rather keep the forward group as is and use non roster assets to get the solid top 4 rhd to push them over the edge.
Dec. 3, 2018 at 2:13 a.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
A rental Dmen would be a better option, NYR - McQuaid?, Stl - Bouwmester?, Dall - Polak?, Det - Kronwall? Chi - Ruuta?


God please just don't bring Polak back tho. Leafs need d that can skate, he's well past that
Dec. 3, 2018 at 2:49 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 173
Likes: 44
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
A rental Dmen would be a better option, NYR - McQuaid?, Stl - Bouwmester?, Dall - Polak?, Det - Kronwall? Chi - Ruuta?


I think if you had a chance to add a D-Man of Martinez's caliber for 2 more years at $3 mil a year you do it. That's cost effective in my opinion. Let Gardiner walk and have a top 6 next year of Reilly/Martinez/Dermott/Zaitsev/Ozhiganov/Liljigren. There has to be a way to make it work with the cap.
Dec. 3, 2018 at 5:33 a.m.
#13
Jangle29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 832
Quoting: sebski
the problem with faulk is carolina would need either johnsson or kapanen in the deal as they arnt looking for picks and prospects they want young forwards who can play. I would be ok with doing kappy and like a second or third or johnsson and a first for faulk 50% retained but if the leafs were to go all in this year i would rather keep the forward group as is and use non roster assets to get the solid top 4 rhd to push them over the edge.


I do Johnsson and a 1st anyway. Have to pay to get and sooner or later you go for it
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll