SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eat this Offer Sheet Tampa

Team: 2019-20 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 3, 2019
Published: Jan. 3, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
With room to spare.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$2,250,000
1$1,760,000
1$1,500,000
3$1,500,000
7$10,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,600,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. 2019 4th round pick (CGY)
MTL
  1. Scandella, Marco ($2,000,000 retained)
2.
BUF
    Point
    TBL
    1. 2020 1st round pick (BUF)
    2. 2021 1st round pick (BUF)
    3. 2022 1st round pick (BUF)
    Additional Details:
    2023 1st
    3.
    BUF
    1. 2020 2nd round pick (DET)
    2. 2021 2nd round pick (DET)
    DET
      McCabe
      Retained Salary Transactions
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2019
      Logo of the CGY
      2020
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the DET
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      2021
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the DET
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      2022
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$83,000,000$71,375,000$0$5,532,500$11,625,000
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $8,600,000$8,600,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $10,000,000$10,000,000
      C
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RW, LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      $10,000,000$10,000,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $3,650,000$3,650,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      LW, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,760,000$1,760,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
      LD/RD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,300,000$1,300,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $5,400,000$5,400,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $812,500$812,500
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,050,000$1,050,000
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      LD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:21 p.m.
      #1
      Shibbal18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2016
      Posts: 25,263
      Likes: 9,047
      McCabe trade is bad, but like the idea of stealing point
      wojme liked this.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:22 p.m.
      #2
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      You're not getting 2 2nd's for a 5th defender
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:22 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 6,470
      Likes: 1,982
      Why don't you just trade Middelstadt, Thompson, and 1st (maybe 2) for Point? better than giving up 4 firsts.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:31 p.m.
      #4
      hey look a squirrel
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2018
      Posts: 6,056
      Likes: 3,760
      I like the idea of Sabres offer sheeting Point.
      Shibbal18 liked this.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:42 p.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2017
      Posts: 7,700
      Likes: 5,912
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      You're not getting 2 2nd's for a 5th defender


      Don't see where we're getting 2 seconds for a 5th defender...
      Shibbal18 and corsiagainst liked this.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:42 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 306
      Likes: 127
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      You're not getting 2 2nd's for a 5th defender


      McCabe definitely isn't an offense D-man but he's far from a 5th defender. He plays on the top pair. two 2nd picks (2 years down the road) is a fair offer. Especially since he's extremely cheap and an RFA. Its a good deal.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 1:57 p.m.
      #7
      Shibbal18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2016
      Posts: 25,263
      Likes: 9,047
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      You're not getting 2 2nd's for a 5th defender


      McCabe is literally their most complete dman and a top pair guy, theirs 0 reason for Buffalo to move him
      wojme liked this.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:01 p.m.
      #8
      Shibbal18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2016
      Posts: 25,263
      Likes: 9,047
      Quoting: Chopper02
      Why don't you just trade Middelstadt, Thompson, and 1st (maybe 2) for Point? better than giving up 4 firsts.


      Not at all, Sabres have 2 firsts in 2019 and probably StLs in 2020, if not also in 2019. 3 years with out a first but they get a top tier talent and complete their roster, those 1st would assumedly be late round any way. Thats much better than giving up 2 kids who already have experience and are developing in the NHL level, and are expected to be producers in the near future.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:04 p.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 6,470
      Likes: 1,982
      Quoting: Shibbal18
      Not at all, Sabres have 2 firsts in 2019 and probably StLs in 2020, if not also in 2019. 3 years with out a first but they get a top tier talent and complete their roster, those 1st would assumedly be late round any way. Thats much better than giving up 2 kids who already have experience and are developing in the NHL level, and are expected to be producers in the near future.


      I can tell you Thompson will be nothing more than a 3rd liner. Still don't understand why Blues drafted him when they did. But trading Middelstadt isn't a bad idea to get Point. Besides why pay him 10million when he could possibly get less?
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:08 p.m.
      #10
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      Quoting: corsiagainst
      McCabe definitely isn't an offense D-man but he's far from a 5th defender. He plays on the top pair. two 2nd picks (2 years down the road) is a fair offer. Especially since he's extremely cheap and an RFA. Its a good deal.


      Just because he plays on the top pair, doesn't mean he's top pair quality. All it does is show how bad the Sabres defense group is.

      2 2nds from any team, especially Detriot is an overpayment for him.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:12 p.m.
      #11
      ColbyT91
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 121
      Likes: 13
      How about no
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:12 p.m.
      #12
      Thread Starter
      BiscuitBakesHotTaeks
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2018
      Posts: 1,327
      Likes: 361
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      Just because he plays on the top pair, doesn't mean he's top pair quality. All it does is show how bad the Sabres defense group is.

      2 2nds from any team, especially Detriot is an overpayment for him.


      McCabe is a 4/5 on pace for like 27 points. He is absolutely worth 2 2nds which in hockey are not worth a lot.

      Also, hilarious that the the McCabe trade caused the most outrage on this post ?
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:12 p.m.
      #13
      Thread Starter
      BiscuitBakesHotTaeks
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2018
      Posts: 1,327
      Likes: 361
      Quoting: ColbyStamkosfan
      How about no


      Oh no, how about yes.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:16 p.m.
      #14
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 306
      Likes: 127
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      Just because he plays on the top pair, doesn't mean he's top pair quality. All it does is show how bad the Sabres defense group is.

      2 2nds from any team, especially Detriot is an overpayment for him.


      It's obvious your set in your opinion and clearly haven't watched them play. Which is fine, because its not an overpayment, especially since the 2nds are 2 and 3 years down the road.

      Just so you know how GMs value future year picks, the usually loose one round worth of value per year. 2020 2nd = 2019 3rd and 2021 2nd = 2019 4th. Its far from an exact science obviously, but since GMs are typically hired to be fired they value picks in the current year much higher then down the road.

      So it would be comparable to trading McCabe for a 3rd and 4th rounder this year, which IMO would be undervaluing him.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:18 p.m.
      #15
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      Quoting: BiscuitBakesandHotTaeks
      McCabe is a 4/5 on pace for like 27 points. He is absolutely worth 2 2nds which in hockey are not worth a lot.

      Also, hilarious that the the McCabe trade caused the most outrage on this post ?


      Yes because points are the best way to evaluate players, especially defenders.

      There's no way in hell a competent GM is trading 2 2nd's for him.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:24 p.m.
      #16
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      Quoting: corsiagainst
      It's obvious your set in your opinion and clearly haven't watched them play. Which is fine, because its not an overpayment, especially since the 2nds are 2 and 3 years down the road.

      Just so you know how GMs value future year picks, the usually loose one round worth of value per year. 2020 2nd = 2019 3rd and 2021 2nd = 2019 4th. Its far from an exact science obviously, but since GMs are typically hired to be fired they value picks in the current year much higher then down the road.

      So it would be comparable to trading McCabe for a 3rd and 4th rounder this year, which IMO would be undervaluing him.


      "Watching him play", that's just another phrase for confirmation bias. I'll admit he's been okay this year, but that's just another form of recency bias. For his career, McCabe gets hosed while not even playing that many tough minutes. If there's a team that's really depsperate for depth defending help, a 2nd from a contending team this year should be his max value.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:26 p.m.
      #17
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      Quoting: Shibbal18
      McCabe is literally their most complete dman and a top pair guy, theirs 0 reason for Buffalo to move him


      Just goes to show how bad the Sabres defense group is.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:36 p.m.
      #18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 306
      Likes: 127
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      "Watching him play", that's just another phrase for confirmation bias. I'll admit he's been okay this year, but that's just another form of recency bias. For his career, McCabe gets hosed while not even playing that many tough minutes. If there's a team that's really depsperate for depth defending help, a 2nd from a contending team this year should be his max value.


      Actually watching them play is just that: seeing how they are used in game situations (penalty kill, extra man, power play, defensive zone starts vs offensive zone starts, etc.) and is not confirmation bias whatsoever.

      And you kind of hurt your own point by saying "McCabe gets hosed while not even playing tough minutes" when in fact he's played literally the hardest minutes alongside Ristolainen. Which you would know if you followed the team or watched them play. I'm not saying he's necessarily a "top-pair" guy, but he's definitely not a 5th D-man.

      My main point that you seem to continue to miss is: the value of a 2020 2nd rounder and a 2021 2nd rounder is fair value for a young (25) shutdown LHD who is making 1.6 million and is an RFA (all things which increase his value to teams).

      It's pretty simple actually, but let's agree to disagree.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:37 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2017
      Posts: 7,700
      Likes: 5,912
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      Just goes to show how bad the Sabres defense group is.


      Coming from someone who is used to watching Olli matta get burned on a nightly basis
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:41 p.m.
      #20
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      Quoting: wojme
      Coming from someone who is used to watching Olli matta get burned on a nightly basis


      Let me just say this: If Maatta was on the Sabres, he'd be their best defender by a landslide
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:49 p.m.
      #21
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2017
      Posts: 7,700
      Likes: 5,912
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      Let me just say this: If Maatta was on the Sabres, he'd be their best defender by a landslide


      Apparently I missed that the sabres traded away ever defenseman in the system.
      Shibbal18 liked this.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:50 p.m.
      #22
      Analytics are good
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 3,604
      Likes: 962
      Quoting: corsiagainst
      Actually watching them play is just that: seeing how they are used in game situations (penalty kill, extra man, power play, defensive zone starts vs offensive zone starts, etc.) and is not confirmation bias whatsoever.

      And you kind of hurt your own point by saying "McCabe gets hosed while not even playing tough minutes" when in fact he's played literally the hardest minutes alongside Ristolainen. Which you would know if you followed the team or watched them play. I'm not saying he's necessarily a "top-pair" guy, but he's definitely not a 5th D-man.

      My main point that you seem to continue to miss is: the value of a 2020 2nd rounder and a 2021 2nd rounder is fair value for a young (25) shutdown LHD who is making 1.6 million and is an RFA (all things which increase his value to teams).

      It's pretty simple actually, but let's agree to disagree.


      A lone 2nd which will probably land in the 55-62 from a contender who's looking to round out their bottom pairing might be fair, but 2 2nd's from a rebuilding team like Detroit isn't fair. Both those picks will probably be in the 32-40 range and no competent GM would risk that much for a low reward.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 2:57 p.m.
      #23
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 306
      Likes: 127
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      Let me just say this: If Maatta was on the Sabres, he'd be their best defender by a landslide


      Alright, you've officially lost me lol. Make sure you give your parents back there computer when you've finished.

      For fun though lets rank some of the Sabres D-man and Maatta:

      1. Dahlin
      2. Risto
      3. McCabe
      4. Pilut
      5. Bogo
      6. Scandella (This is probably were Maatta ends up)

      Just my opinion
      wojme liked this.
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 3:03 p.m.
      #24
      Shibbal18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2016
      Posts: 25,263
      Likes: 9,047
      Quoting: PenGoater99
      Just goes to show how bad the Sabres defense group is.

      Sabres are top 10 in team defense lead by this group
      Jan. 3, 2019 at 3:05 p.m.
      #25
      Shibbal18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2016
      Posts: 25,263
      Likes: 9,047
      Quoting: corsiagainst
      Alright, you've officially lost me lol. Make sure you give your parents back there computer when you've finished.

      For fun though lets rank some of the Sabres D-man and Maatta:

      1. Dahlin
      2. Risto
      3. McCabe
      4. Pilut
      5. Bogo
      6. Scandella (This is probably were Maatta ends up)

      Just my opinion


      Id have him equal or slightly better than Bogo but thats at best
      corsiagainst and wojme liked this.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll