SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Part 1 of oilers trade

Created by: PuckPal
Team: 2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 20, 2019
Published: Jan. 24, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If oilers are going to do a restructure getting 1sts and young prospects are needed. This trade is right now but at the draft the trade is completed. But before people say why would the oilers be interested in brown remember McDavid and Brown have a past history of being linemates and brown understands how McDavid thinks the game. So he could be what Chris Kunitz was to Crosby a solid allround player who complements McDavid. Also, i get this might be an overpay but the thought is if the leafs overpay for Larsson it might actually slowdown the d market this TDL just like where Toronto got a 2nd round pick for Polak and garbage. So if the leafs do this at the draft they can then of needed trade Johnsson or Kapanen which finishes the trade just like when SJ gave up practically nothing for Reimer. It a thought but it solves 2 things 1 the leafs get the net clearing Shutdown dman they need with term on a solid contract and the oilers look like they know what they are doing finally.
Trades
EDM
  1. Brown, Connor
  2. Holl, Justin
  3. Liljegren, Timothy
  4. 2019 1st round pick (TOR)
  5. 2020 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
THE 2020 1ST IS CONDITIONAL ON THE THE LEAFS WINNING THE CUP BY THE 2020 DRAFT IF NOT ITS A 2ND
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$78,952,777$2,550,000$5,400,000$547,223
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,277,778$10,277,778
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$650,000$650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$650,000$650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 24, 2019 at 11:26 a.m.
#1
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Definitely don't have to give up what amounts to 3 first rounders for Larsson. Give up a decent prospect like Liljegren, Brown and a 1st, and he's probably yours (On here).
Jan. 24, 2019 at 11:48 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
This is ridiculous.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 12:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 42
Likes: 7
You're massively overvaluing Larsson, for what you're paying you'd need to be getting a superstar in return.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 12:24 p.m.
#4
TiBo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 445
Likes: 154
When did Larsson become Erik Karlsson? I wouldn't give up that package for Karlsson either... Bad trade for the Buds!
Jan. 24, 2019 at 1:51 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 137
Quoting: Lenny7
Definitely don't have to give up what amounts to 3 first rounders for Larsson. Give up a decent prospect like Liljegren, Brown and a 1st, and he's probably yours (On here).


The point was to also overpay on this part of the trade and then if they trade johnnson or kap they slightly over pay to offset but what this causes is other teams needing to overpay for dman this TDL and at the draft causes less trades which helps the oilers and Leafs get what they need and stops other teams from improving greatly.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 1:54 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 137
Quoting: TiBo23
When did Larsson become Erik Karlsson? I wouldn't give up that package for Karlsson either... Bad trade for the Buds!


Larsson and if they can dump someother contracts will free up cap to go after Karlsson in UFA. Also read to post the point is to overpay on this part of the trade to cause a slow down on TDL. So read the post.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 1:58 p.m.
#7
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: PuckPal
The point was to also overpay on this part of the trade and then if they trade johnnson or kap they slightly over pay to offset but what this causes is other teams needing to overpay for dman this TDL and at the draft causes less trades which helps the oilers and Leafs get what they need and stops other teams from improving greatly.


That sounds very much like you want to get yourself in a game of chicken with the rest of the league. Probably not the best idea.
Juice liked this.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 2:01 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 137
Quoting: OilersFan77
You're massively overvaluing Larsson, for what you're paying you'd need to be getting a superstar in return.


I know the point is Overpay on this part and then the oilers overpay for maybe Johnsson or Kap at the draft and at the end of the day oilers have isurance the leafs trade one of them this offseason and then it really becomes Brown, Kapanen, liljgren, and Holl for Larsson, Chaisson. Thats what I'm thinking once part 2 is done at the draft if the leafs figure they can't afford Kap next year.so at point the trade is somewhat fair and the leafs can go for the cup this offseason.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 2:03 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 137
Quoting: Lenny7
That sounds very much like you want to get yourself in a game of chicken with the rest of the league. Probably not the best idea.


Teams have done it in the past and what it does is make other team strip their depth for players and once the leafs finish this trade at the draft it then becomes a value trade and the rest of the league are messed depth wise.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 2:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1,512
Quoting: PuckPal
Teams have done it in the past and what it does is make other team strip their depth for players and once the leafs finish this trade at the draft it then becomes a value trade and the rest of the league are messed depth wise.


So when is the other half of the Hall-Larsson trade going down?

That’s the only trade I can think of that made the rest of the league take a step back and reassess the value of trading for a d-man.

What other deal stunted the market and was followed up in the offseason by those same two teams making another lopsided deal the other way?
Jan. 24, 2019 at 2:31 p.m.
#11
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: PuckPal
Teams have done it in the past and what it does is make other team strip their depth for players and once the leafs finish this trade at the draft it then becomes a value trade and the rest of the league are messed depth wise.


This is a bigger haul than the Sens got for Karlsson (Who's a pending UFA, but one of the top 3 dmen in the league).

If you think you can reset the market, giver, but blowing your prospect/draft pick wad on a second pairing guy with the thought that every other GM around the league is then going to up their asking price and refuse to sell any cheaper, is a dangerous game.

Quoting: Juice
What other deal stunted the market and was followed up in the offseason by those same two teams making another lopsided deal the other way?


I'm also curious as to an example of this happening?

I've said, and will continue to say that the best way to build a d-core is internally. Nashville, Anaheim, Chicago (while they were in their prime), LA, SJ, etc. have all built their cores by drafting well (Nashville added PK, and SJ added Karlsson, but even without him they are insanely talented). Let Liljegren and Sandin come up next year and show their stuff. Keeps it affordable, and allows those picks/prospects/depth players to be used for something better than Adam Larsson.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 2:41 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 137
Edited Jan. 24, 2019 at 2:51 p.m.
Quoting: Juice
So when is the other half of the Hall-Larsson trade going down?

That’s the only trade I can think of that made the rest of the league take a step back and reassess the value of trading for a d-man.

What other deal stunted the market and was followed up in the offseason by those same two teams making another lopsided deal the other way?


The leafs trading Polak for a 2nd then a few weeks later trading Reimer for nothing. This caused every value to go up on dman and only borderine 2nd pair 3rd pair dman were traded that TDL the dman were suppost to be traded at that TDL and were done in the offseason. So the point is cause a reassesment which causes better dman to not be traded by the TDL and seeing the overpay is to insure TOR finish the trade at the draft this helps each team. The value could be dropped to a conditional 1st in 2019 if they don't want to do this and then we still get value for Larsson who is a solid big body, Shot blocking, shut down dman the leafs need.
Jan. 24, 2019 at 6:23 p.m.
#13
TiBo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 445
Likes: 154
Quoting: TiBo23
When did Larsson become Erik Karlsson? I wouldn't give up that package for Karlsson either... Bad trade for the Buds!


Yeah, now it is twice that I have read your dribble. Hard pass by the Leafs....
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll