SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buff

Team: 2019-20 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 7, 2019
Published: Jun. 7, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,200,000
1$1,200,000
2$1,800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$8,750,000
2$2,500,000
4$3,800,000
3$5,250,000
2$4,200,000
2$2,250,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. 2019 7th round pick (EDM)
  2. 2020 5th round pick (EDM)
2.
BUF
  1. 2019 6th round pick (MTL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the EDM
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,000,000$77,491,667$0$3,700,000$5,508,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$8,750,000$8,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,650,000$3,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,200,000$4,200,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,387,500$3,387,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$812,500$812,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 7, 2019 at 7:37 a.m.
#1
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Marc Methot and Montreal are two of the happiest entities if this BS ever happened
wojme liked this.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 8:08 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,685
Likes: 5,901
Didn't even need to look at the username to see that you're not a sabres fan
SalamiCheese, Zanerax and GMTD liked this.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 8:25 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
LMAO
giphy.gif
GMTD and wojme liked this.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 9:47 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 71
Likes: 36
Edited Jun. 7, 2019 at 9:53 a.m.
McCabe will get more than that, and should also be playing. Sabres really wouldn't be interested in Methot. That's a risky signing after his injuries and also one they don't need, as they have a lot of LHD depth.

Sabres most likely roll out Hutton/Ullmark again in net. Ullmark had a down year and Mrazek an up one, but I'm not sure if that's much or even an upgrade. And Ullmark is still the hope for the Sabres future starter, which is what would determine if they want to move on from him.

I like the notion of Donskoi, we definitely need more middle six/depth scoring. I'm apathetic to Johansson. There's definitely a hole there that needs to be filled, but I feel like he'll be overpaid for what he has left in the tank. He's had a good playoffs though.

Sobotka is an offensive black hole, and should not be playing with Sam. Move him down to the fourth line (or scratch him), shift Sheary up, and move Rodriguez to Mittlestadt's wing. That probably means either resigning Larsson or bringing up Asplund to fill that role. Not sure which I'd favor. Also Nylander to consider on the wings.

And Olofsson has his problems and large weaknesses, but a sixth isn't a big enough incentive to give up on him for me. Plus Montreal has a ****load of forward depth, which would be hard for him to crack (he is a scoring role or bust player, and I don't think he'd have much of a chance for that role there). Not sure they'd be the destination anyway.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 9:50 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: Zanerax
McCabe will get more than that, and should also be playing. Sabres really wouldn't be interested in Methot. That's a risky signing after his injuries and also one they don't need, as they have a lot of LHD depth.

Sabres most likely roll out Hutton/Ullmark again in net. Ullmark had a down year and Mrazek an up one, but I'm not sure if that's much or even an upgrade. And Ullmark is still the hope for the Sabres future starter, which is what would determine if they want to move on from him.

I like the notion of Donskoi, we definitely need more middle six/depth scoring. I'm apathetic to Johansson. There's definitely a hole there that needs to be filled, but I feel like he'll be overpaid for what he has left in the tank. He's had a good playoffs though.

Sobotka is an offensive black hole, and should not be playing with Sam. Move him down to the fourth line (or scratch him), shift Sheary up, and move Rodriguez to Mittlestadt's wing. That probably means either resigning Larsson or bringing up Asplund to fill that role. Not sure which I'd favor. Also Nylander to consider on the wings.


Why are you writing this to him? He's not a Buffalo fan, he's just trading one of our best prospects for round six.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 9:58 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 71
Likes: 36
Quoting: Cheesesauce
Why are you writing this to him? He's not a Buffalo fan, he's just trading one of our best prospects for round six.


It seemed like a real attempt, even if parts are off base. I thought I'd give what insight I could in case OP would find it interesting/helpful.

Not sure if I'd call Olofsson one of our best prospects. He's definitely talented and promising (that shot), but he only plays half the ice. We'll see what happens on that front.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 10:06 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: Zanerax
It seemed like a real attempt, even if parts are off base. I thought I'd give what insight I could in case OP would find it interesting/helpful.

Not sure if I'd call Olofsson one of our best prospects. He's definitely talented and promising (that shot), but he only plays half the ice. We'll see what happens on that front.


Who's better than Olofsson? Any Buffalo fan will tell you that he is in the top 3 of our best prospects. Of course, if you don't count Mittelstadt, although even if you assume that Olofsson for me still in the top 3. If so, and Olofsson does not sparkle, we are doomed.
Jun. 7, 2019 at 10:28 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 71
Likes: 36
Quoting: Cheesesauce
Who's better than Olofsson? Any Buffalo fan will tell you that he is in the top 3 of our best prospects. Of course, if you don't count Mittelstadt, although even if you assume that Olofsson for me still in the top 3. If so, and Olofsson does not sparkle, we are doomed.


I'll concede the point on top prospect. But I wouldn't call him a blue-chip prospect or sure thing. Though he definitely has the offensive tools (exceptional shot, good passer and solid vision, etc.), he also floats a lot and has had some really ugly and situationally bad cases of cherry picking downstairs. That probably sours me on him more than his game as a whole warrants.

We have other prospects that might not project to be as big of impact players, but I'd say are higher probability to pan out. Asplund is someone I'm high on. Solid two-way player with offensive upside. He had a good year on the Amerks as well. I might personally place both him and UPL above Olofsson, even if it might not be the "best" list
Jun. 7, 2019 at 10:36 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 2,670
Quoting: Zanerax
I'll concede the point on top prospect. But I wouldn't call him a blue-chip prospect or sure thing. Though he definitely has the offensive tools (exceptional shot, good passer and solid vision, etc.), he also floats a lot and has had some really ugly and situationally bad cases of cherry picking downstairs. That probably sours me on him more than his game as a whole warrants.

We have other prospects that might not project to be as big of impact players, but I'd say are higher probability to pan out. Asplund is someone I'm high on. Solid two-way player with offensive upside. He had a good year on the Amerks as well. I might personally place both him and UPL above Olofsson, even if it might not be the "best" list


I've seen a lot of games with Olofsson and I was impressed with this guy. He was absolutely the best in Rochester, in the playoffs, he certainly dissolved like the whole team, this is the problem of the coach, and the second year in a row, but this season I saw the progress of Olofsson, he added to the game in defense, he is universal and can play on both wings, he is a great option on PP with his shot, for me it is still above Asplund. UPL seems to our best prospect, unless you count guys like Pilut and Mittelstadt, Olofsson right behind them. Of course this does not negate the fact that this guy is not unfamiliar with Buffalo and sells Olofsson for sixth round.
Zanerax liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll