SammyT_51

GM Hockeysaurus Rex

Member Since

Jul. 26, 2016

Favourite Team

Toronto Maple Leafs

2nd Favourite Team

St. Louis Blues

Forum Posts

14152

Posts per Day

5.3

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 29 at 3:28 p.m.

Thread: Keeping Core 4

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>No that’s not the arguement, I would venture Murray and the 1st for Sturm and a 4th,
Or Murray and the 1st for Gregor and a 3rd.
But the sharks 2nd or Ferraro isn’t logical.</div></div>

Then Leafs add a prospect.. or a pick this is all small bs that can be dealt with in like later details. The idea of it is Leafs using a 1st round pick to send Murray out, cap dumping him and Leafs getting an asset in that deal instead of a draft pick. Could Leafs add another pick to further set the price to the exact point? Yeah.. but I never got to that. This is all small semantics..

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 29 at 3:20 p.m.

Thread: Keeping Core 4

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>Just because you fleeced Chicago who wanted a bad goalie to tank a season doesn’t mean that’s the norm!

These are getting worse I swear by the draft it will be Eklund and the sharks 1st for Murray</div></div>

Nah its not gonna be that. It can be Murray and 1st for a late draft pick for all I care, or Leafs can just buy him out.. this is about the opportunity for both teams to add assets. You dont want to fight for Macklin Celebrini while getting ANOTHER 1st round pick in this years draft? That doesnt seem too wise..

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 29 at 2:59 p.m.

Thread: Keeping Core 4

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blacktown</b></div><div>Lol no. Not even remotely interested in that. Do leafs fans have to be reminded every day that Matt Murray is a cap dump?</div></div>

Well duh.. Toronto "Mrazek"s Murray to San Jose but instead of getting 2nd round pick back, we get Ferraro.. same value. Reminder that Leafs did the same thing year before. Moving down 13 spots from 1st round to 2nd round to unload two years and 8.8 million of salary on Mrazek. Same thing here, but instead of moving down in draft, let Sharks have the picks and give us a mid pair D who are all worth a 2nd round pick anyways.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 23, 2021 at 4:53 p.m.

Thread: Trade Offers for Heiskanen

Why would you trade Heiskanen in the first place.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 1, 2021 at 6:16 p.m.

Thread: KERFOOT

lol no

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 31, 2021 at 8:21 a.m.

Thread: tell me if you would take this trade

No.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 6, 2021 at 11:11 a.m.

Thread: shut it down in time for shane wright

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil1122</b></div><div>Devils easily pass</div></div>

So do Leafs.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1, 2021 at 12:29 p.m.

Thread: Florida

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsDynasty</b></div><div>I got to disagree w u there... he is a solid 3rd line player... maybe Vesey and a 3rd?</div></div>

Leafs are likely trading for a 3C in-season which might very well be Staal.. and even without that, he is not better than any of the starting 12 when everyone is healthy. He is simply not. His highest point total he had without last year was 14 points.. thats 4th line numbers no matter what. His unsustainable shooting percentage from last year is not staying there and this year we can see it very well. He is a fourthliner who I would probably trade Vesey and late pick for but not much more.. he is 13th forward on Leafs.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1, 2021 at 11:24 a.m.

Thread: Rakell

Not for that much. Thats a hell of an overpayment.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1, 2021 at 10:36 a.m.

Thread: Florida

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsDynasty</b></div><div>He played good last year but is off to a bad start. I would say he would be good for what Keefe would want on a checking 3rd line.</div></div>

He is an average 4th line winger. I would replace Vesey with him but he is not as good as other 11 players. And you did that for 2nd round pick? Thats just bad..

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 1, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.

Thread: Florida

So upgrading from bad 4th liner to average 4th liner costs 2nd round pick.. thats interesting.

Forum: Montreal CanadiensFeb. 26, 2021 at 9:54 a.m.

Thread: What teams would be interested in Carey Price and Shea Weber

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bmersereau73</b></div><div>Then Montreal shouldn't bother IMO, you don't want to retain salary on these guys, which probably makes them impossible to move.</div></div>

None of the teams have desire in either of those player for full price..

Forum: Montreal CanadiensFeb. 26, 2021 at 8:57 a.m.

Thread: What teams would be interested in Carey Price and Shea Weber

If you retain half on Weber, maybe him on Leafs, but the desire is pretty low to be honest.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26, 2021 at 3:47 a.m.

Thread: LETS MAKE SOME NOISE

good god jesus.. wtf is that Leafs trade

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 4:24 p.m.

Thread: Offseason value additions

Liljegren not traded? Is this a dream??

Forum: Fauteuil - DGFeb. 25, 2021 at 10:13 a.m.

Thread: What would it take for Nylander

Nylander for Lindholm+2nd would be fair.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 7:11 a.m.

Thread: Could this be something Tkachuk

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterK</b></div><div>Hahaha, ok Mr. angry. How about instead of getting yourself all worked up about lily, actually think about what you might trade for Tkachuk? We have different opinions on Liljegren clearly but luckily I don't get worked up over hypothetical trades.</div></div>

I dont either, its just observation I made.. as for Tkachuk value.. Id definitely do Nylander+, but that plus is not gonna be that huge.. the difference between Tkachuk and Willy is not that huge that you need to include future top-4 D in the trade lol

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 6:48 a.m.

Thread: Could this be something Tkachuk

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterK</b></div><div>Did you have a bad sleep? You are awfully grumpy this morning. You really like Liljegren huh.</div></div>

Had a great sleep. It just pisses me off that each trade begins and ends with Liljegren being moved which is the most ridiculous bull**** ever since he is on same career path as Rasmus Andersson who is now probably the second best Flames D behind Gio and would be first once Gio finishes his career. Same career path.. yes I do really like Liljegren, because I know what he brings and what he develops into and that something is a top-4 stud and it makes ZERO sense to throw him into a deal as a "throw-in".. thats literally exact opposite of what contenders do. They develop their own talent and use them properly..

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 6:42 a.m.

Thread: Could this be something Tkachuk

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterK</b></div><div>Getting different opinions. This is exactly why Liljegren might be added. Tkachuk >> Nylander in terms of value. I love Nylander but he wouldn't be enough to get Tkachuk so you add Liljegren. Toronto has a wave of Dmen prospects coming plus their D core is quite young so they have some time. Liljegren MIGHT be a stud but far from a sure thing. You want the Leafs to win in the playoffs? Then you need to pay up for a guy like Tkachuk. It is easy to see the team lacking since Wayne Simmonds has gone down with injury. They need that kind of presence.

Imagine that top line: Matthews - Marner - Tkachuk. Who could match that line?</div></div>

Tkachuk wont go from CGY and Leafs are not trading Liljegren.. you wanna be contender? You develop your defense and play players who you develop within your system. CGY aint selling Tkachuk and Leafs shouldnt move Liljegren because he is gonna be a stud. If you dont believe in Liljegren, tell me exactly why he wont be a stud. Im waiting.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 6:30 a.m.

Thread: Could this be something Tkachuk

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterK</b></div><div>That is what we thought a few years ago. Liljegren won't be a stud. Or rather it is looking less likely. He will be an NHLer but Tkachuk is a serious commodity.</div></div>

He is 21 years old LMFAO, He is on SAME path as Rasmus Andersson LOL

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 6:27 a.m.

Thread: Could this be something Tkachuk

I too would like the "sweetener" to be future top-4 stud.. stop it.. I would love Tkachuk on Leafs, but I would not be adding that much value to Nylander if Im getting him..

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2021 at 3:31 a.m.

Thread: Restructure the Forwards

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dlowe5</b></div><div>Just exploring a Nylander trade and liljegren will be traded for a quality piece as there’s to much of a log jam.</div></div>

Liljegren is part of this teams future top-4 on defense. He isnt getting moved.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 24, 2021 at 7:40 a.m.

Thread: Restructure the Forwards

Stop doing those ****ty Liljegren and forsberg trades.. ****ing hell.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 23, 2021 at 10:10 a.m.

Thread: Big TDL

Leafs are not trading for Forsberg.. just stop it. And if they do its salary in salary out so Nylander

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 23, 2021 at 9:20 a.m.

Thread: Question for leafs fans

Nah. Hutch has .914 sv% in 2 games. The issue wasnt really him.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

SammyT_51

GM Hockeysaurus Rex

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day