SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How to fix the cap

Created by: Caniac2000
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 9, 2019
Published: Jul. 9, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I am not a leafs fan I have no connection to this team, this is just glaringly obvious to me. Tell me what you think



Reminder you do not HAVE to carry a 23 man roster
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$11,500,000
Trades
TOR
  1. Bogosian, Zach ($2,500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Add whatever you need to make the value fair, this is more Buffalo taking the extra cap, bad player for bad player. Bogo is a good 3RD, overpaid yes. He only has 1 year left too, it doesn't have to be Bogosian, but the alternative with Buffalo was Hunwick and I didn't think Toronto wanted to see that again.

In essence this is just to speed up the Ceci 1 year contract thing, at a reduced price. You still get all that cap for next year. What do you think?
BUF
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CBJ)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$80,365,056$0$0$1,134,944
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,500,000$11,500,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$737,500$737,500
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:41 p.m.
#1
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
indifferent about the ceci-bogo trade.

marner getting 11.5 x 5 is absolutely insane
Leafs6God liked this.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:41 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 418
There has to be a market for Ceci on a one year deal. Remember Justin Schultz in Edmonton?
Leafs6God liked this.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:45 p.m.
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: mondo
indifferent about the ceci-bogo trade.

marner getting 11.5 x 5 is absolutely insane


so is matthews deal. That's why this is happening.
Goulet liked this.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:48 p.m.
#4
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
That's an awful deal for marner. Dubas trades him before he thinks about signing that
Leafs6God and Goulet liked this.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:52 p.m.
#5
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,396
Likes: 996
Quoting: Goulet
There has to be a market for Ceci on a one year deal. Remember Justin Schultz in Edmonton?


Exactly, Ceci can still become a solid puck moving defenseman.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:52 p.m.
#6
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,396
Likes: 996
Quoting: Bcarlo25
so is matthews deal. That's why this is happening.


The Matthews deal wasn’t that bad. Term sucks but the cap hit is fair in my opinion.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:53 p.m.
#7
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
Quoting: Bcarlo25
so is matthews deal. That's why this is happening.


it's not. even if you think he's worth 11.5 it's a bad idea to give him 5 years.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:57 p.m.
#8
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
The Matthews deal wasn’t that bad. Term sucks but the cap hit is fair in my opinion.


agreed. But guess what? Term is really really really important. Hence why Matthews was asking for 13.8 for an 8 year deal. 5 years at 11.634 is bonkers money. It's effectively the biggest contract signed in NHL history.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 3:57 p.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: mondo
it's not. even if you think he's worth 11.5 it's a bad idea to give him 5 years.


soooo you agree with me? I think Matthews is worth 11.5, but giving him that over 5 years was a hilariously bad decision.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:00 p.m.
#10
johnjohn
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 182
Likes: 32
Marner will likely settle for 11 million over 5 years. A hometown discount would be a 6th year but that is not looking good.
Dubas set the bar and Marner wants to be treated fairly .
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:03 p.m.
#11
johnjohn
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 182
Likes: 32
I love the people saying 8 or 9 million. He already was offered 10 million and countered with 12.5.
Dubas set the market rate and the minimum now is 11 million. Just like Mathews and Tavares
Bcarlo25 liked this.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:03 p.m.
#12
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
Quoting: Bcarlo25
soooo you agree with me? I think Matthews is worth 11.5, but giving him that over 5 years was a hilariously bad decision.


was referring to marner not being worth 11.5. i think the matthews deal should've been 6 years at least.

if i had to guess dubas purposefully gave matthews a blank check so he didn't have to deal with both of them this offseason.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:05 p.m.
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: mondo
was referring to marner not being worth 11.5. i think the matthews deal should've been 6 years at least.

if i had to guess dubas purposefully gave matthews a blank check so he didn't have to deal with both of them this offseason.


Then Marner should be doing exactly what he's been doing. I don't think either are worth 5x11.5. I think Matthews at 12 over 8 would have been fine. I think Marner at 11 over 8 is fine.

I think Marner at 10.5x5 is fair, given the matthews contract.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:09 p.m.
#14
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Then Marner should be doing exactly what he's been doing. I don't think either are worth 5x11.5. I think Matthews at 12 over 8 would have been fine. I think Marner at 11 over 8 is fine.

I think Marner at 10.5x5 is fair, given the matthews contract.


having matthews and marner both expire in 5 years is not a good idea. they'll both be ufa's by then.

realistically i think he gets around 10 mil for 4 years.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:13 p.m.
#15
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: mondo
having matthews and marner both expire in 5 years is not a good idea. they'll both be ufa's by then.

realistically i think he gets around 10 mil for 4 years.


realistically, I can guarantee you that the term will not be 4 years. There isn't a snowballs chance in hell that Dubas offers four years. I think it's more likely that he retires from the NHL and plays in Russia than him getting four years.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:36 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 418
Quoting: Bcarlo25
soooo you agree with me? I think Matthews is worth 11.5, but giving him that over 5 years was a hilariously bad decision.


I thought so too at first. And then I thought about how long the team was without a #1 centre, and then how competitive they could be with two #1's...and I realized it was much smarter to overpay a little now for the opportunity.

Marner is another story.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:38 p.m.
#17
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: Goulet
I thought so too at first. And then I thought about how long the team was without a #1 centre, and then how competitive they could be with two #1's...and I realized it was much smarter to overpay a little now for the opportunity.

Marner is another story.


Or just hold out and get him to six 8x12.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:40 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Quoting: Bcarlo25
realistically, I can guarantee you that the term will not be 4 years. There isn't a snowballs chance in hell that Dubas offers four years. I think it's more likely that he retires from the NHL and plays in Russia than him getting four years.


What about a 3-year deal? Keep Marner an RFA for one more round of this media circus
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:48 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 418
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Or just hold out and get him to six 8x12.


Shorter term is smart, these guys learned from Crosby and OV's "mistakes".

9M x 5 has to be a number that neither side is happy with but both can live with.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:48 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 418
Quoting: Leester92
What about a 3-year deal? Keep Marner an RFA for one more round of this media circus


In the 7-7.5M range, sure.
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:51 p.m.
#21
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: Goulet
In the 7-7.5M range, sure.


lol
Jul. 9, 2019 at 4:51 p.m.
#22
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,218
Likes: 7,008
Quoting: Goulet
Shorter term is smart, these guys learned from Crosby and OV's "mistakes".

9M x 5 has to be a number that neither side is happy with but both can live with.


short term is super smart for the player. 5 years is great for the player. Every player wants 5 years. Sucks for the team though.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll