SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston goes all in

Created by: BigBadBruins214
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 7, 2020
Published: Feb. 7, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Dillon, Brenden
  2. 2020 5th round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Moore, John
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (BOS)
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. 2020 5th round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
3.
BOS
  1. Kreider, Chris
  2. 2020 4th round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Heinen, Danton
  2. 2020 1st round pick (BOS)
  3. 2020 5th round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,329,167$0$2,277,500$3,170,833

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,635,000$1,635,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$747,500$747,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 7, 2020 at 2:31 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,882
Likes: 8,874
Edited Feb. 7, 2020 at 2:36 p.m.
Would not trade Bjork for Anderson straight up. Include Backes in that, then maybe.

Better work, team has a very shallow prospect pool and you won’t be adding to it for years.

Honestly the only move i make out these is Rangers and i don’t even like that one. ??‍♂️
Feb. 7, 2020 at 2:38 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
BigBadBruins
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 26
Likes: 3
Quoting: Gofnut999
Would not trade Bjork for Anderson straight up. Include Backes in that, then maybe.


I would think about Bjork for Anderson straight up but def wouldnt send bjork a 2nd and 3rd for Anderson. If we are being realistic though, I doubt Kekalainen would sell low on Anderson considering the year he has had and 6'3 power forwards with speed don't grow on trees. Anderson potted 27 last season and 19 in 63 games played the year before so it isnt out of question that Columbus would ask for a lot hence why I chose to do Bjork, a 2nd, and 3rd. The heinen for kreider trade is based off of the Kevin Hayes deal from last year and Dillion would be an experienced depth defenseman.
Viqsi liked this.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 2:42 p.m.
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,387
Likes: 7,064
*bruins overpay drastically for everything.

Bjork has played better this season than Anderson.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 2:48 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,882
Likes: 8,874
Quoting: BigBadBruins214
I would think about Bjork for Anderson straight up but def wouldnt send bjork a 2nd and 3rd for Anderson. If we are being realistic though, I doubt Kekalainen would sell low on Anderson considering the year he has had and 6'3 power forwards with speed don't grow on trees. Anderson potted 27 last season and 19 in 63 games played the year before so it isnt out of question that Columbus would ask for a lot hence why I chose to do Bjork, a 2nd, and 3rd. The heinen for kreider trade is based off of the Kevin Hayes deal from last year and Dillion would be an experienced depth defenseman.



Consensus around the league is he’s gone before the start of season next year, wether it’s deadline or offseason is another thing.

He’s an RFA and will want a long term deal with a big raise coming off a terrible year. Last negotiations with him left a bad taste in their mouth, they don’t want to deal with it again.

Dillon us not enough of an upgrade over Moore to give up picks and term like that.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 2:55 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Boston isn’t making that Columbus trade and Columbus isn’t going to just sell Anderson for scraps and low picks like Boston fans will want.

I doubt Anderson is going to be traded by the deadline. He’s still an RFA and this time there’s an arbitration hearing for him. My guess is Anderson gets 1 year at about 2.-2.5. Next deadline Anderson will be traded as a rental and the return will depend on if he’s back to what he was, or if he continues down his slump.
Feb. 7, 2020 at 4:02 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
First two trades... ew
Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:54 a.m.
#7
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3,414
Quoting: BigBadBruins214
I would think about Bjork for Anderson straight up but def wouldnt send bjork a 2nd and 3rd for Anderson. If we are being realistic though, I doubt Kekalainen would sell low on Anderson considering the year he has had and 6'3 power forwards with speed don't grow on trees. Anderson potted 27 last season and 19 in 63 games played the year before so it isnt out of question that Columbus would ask for a lot hence why I chose to do Bjork, a 2nd, and 3rd. The heinen for kreider trade is based off of the Kevin Hayes deal from last year and Dillion would be an experienced depth defenseman.

That's a fair assessment w/r/t our position with Andy, but unfortunately you're still working with the wrong sorts of pieces. What we really need is a #2C, not Multiple Okay Assets. (And since it's rather unlikely anyone will trade us such a guy for Andy straight up or with modest adds, he's probably not moving.)
Feb. 8, 2020 at 10:55 a.m.
#8
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3,414
Quoting: Gofnut999
Consensus around the league is he’s gone before the start of season next year

I'm not sure where this came from, but it doesn't match anything I've heard. That may be a common bet, but I don't see it as general consensus.
Feb. 8, 2020 at 11:34 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,882
Likes: 8,874
Quoting: Viqsi
I'm not sure where this came from, but it doesn't match anything I've heard. That may be a common bet, but I don't see it as general consensus.


Pretty much every dirt sheet out there. ??‍♂️
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll