SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sandpaper

Created by: AnalyticsGeek
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 29, 2020
Published: Mar. 29, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I feel the Leafs should trade for Patric Hornqvist. Although he’s a bit older, he is still very effective. He’s the perfect example of the type of player you need in order to win in the playoffs. A warrior who checks aggressively, takes hits, draws penalties & goes to the dirty areas. Leafs need more of that.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,500,000
1$800,000
1$1,750,000
1$800,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Johnson, Jack ($1,625,000 retained)
  3. O'Connor, Drew
  4. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
  5. 2021 2nd round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Marner, Mitchell ($1,393,000 retained)
2.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,000,000$79,811,450$0$1,487,500$3,188,550
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
-$475,000-$475,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:16 p.m.
#26
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Johnson has no value. Hornqvist still has value. His contract isn't the best but that doesn't take away from him being a consistent 20 goal scorer who still plays a physical game. If you call a 1st round pick trash, no matter where the pick is at, is just completed asinine


Seeing that it's a late 1st round pick yeah, There's no guarantees when picks are that late compared to an early st top 4 or 5 Hornqvist is regressing he's like 33 and Johnson is 2 so yeah it's still pure trash for a young Mitch Marner.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:19 p.m.
#27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
yes, 33 year old players making 5.3 million dollars until they turn 36 years old are not on good contracts. Also, since the point of the thread is so that the fake leafs fan who is probably actually a pens fan who made the thread is to offload "over paid" marner, again to the Pens for some miraculous reason, it makes little sense for the leafs to take back a guy who is on a similarly over priced deal.

the difference is that some day Marner might be a 10.8 million dollar player, Horqvist will never be worth his price tag and his relative value will only decrease.


So what youre saying is Hornqvist is just a trash throw/cap dump in any sort of trade?
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.
#28
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Seeing that it's a late 1st round pick yeah, There's no guarantees when picks are that late compared to an early st top 4 or 5 Hornqvist is regressing he's like 33 and Johnson is 2 so yeah it's still pure trash for a young Mitch Marner.


Once again, I never ,mentioned marner. You said "pittsburgh's trash". 1st round picks aren't trash
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
So where are you getting Marner being a 90 point player at then? Because this year he only has 67. And by your logic, if Hornqvist is a 32 point player because of lack of games, then Marner is a 67 point player. Yes, im calling people like you stupid because you cant grasp the fact people dont have to talk specifically about marner lmao. Run along little fragile leaf fan


well, Marner scored 97 points last year, Horqvist only had 18 last year, so there ya go. I also never mentioned marner's point totals and would have used the word pace if i had. You called Hornqvist a consistant 20 goal scorer but he hasnt scored 20 goals in 2 seasons, that doesnt seem very consistant.
And you really are a bag of hammers arnt ya? The post is about Marner, the comments are in relation to Marner, so this is about Marner. These pieces are trash in relation to a trade for Marner. It is simple, dead nuts obvious and simple. You dont have to like it, but that's the long and the short of it
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:21 p.m.
#30
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 437
Likes: 138
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
A physical 20 goal scorer isn't good? lmao good to know


On a 5.3 mil contract? When he is 33 years old? and his contract still has term?
Jeez well I guess in your world you call him good. We call him trash
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:22 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
So what youre saying is Hornqvist is just a trash throw/cap dump in any sort of trade?


is that what I said? Im pretty sure someone with your wonderful comprehension can actually read the words i wrote and gleam the exact stated meaning.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:25 p.m.
#32
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
well, Marner scored 97 points last year, Horqvist only had 18 last year, so there ya go. I also never mentioned marner's point totals and would have used the word pace if i had. You called Hornqvist a consistant 20 goal scorer but he hasnt scored 20 goals in 2 seasons, that doesnt seem very consistant.
And you really are a bag of hammers arnt ya? The post is about Marner, the comments are in relation to Marner, so this is about Marner. These pieces are trash in relation to a trade for Marner. It is simple, dead nuts obvious and simple. You dont have to like it, but that's the long and the short of it


30, 21, 27, 22, 25, 22, 21, 29, 18 (69 games), 17 (52 games). But yeah, not a consistent 20 goal scorer. You call Marner a 90 point player, but only had 1 year even scoring over 70 points. So not sure why you can call Marner a 90 point player for 1 year, but say Hornqvist isn't a consistent 20 goal scorer. Once again, understand where my original point was. One guy said "pittsburghs trash". So thats where I said some of those pieces aren't trash. So no, it was not in relation to a trade for Marner.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:25 p.m.
#33
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Once again, I never ,mentioned marner. You said "pittsburgh's trash". 1st round picks aren't trash


So the deal is for Mitch Marner, And i'm saying it's a trash offer. 33 year old and a 32 year old College guy and late picks don't get you a player of Marners talent. So i stick with my statement that this is a trash offer.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:26 p.m.
#34
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: Leafsfan34
On a 5.3 mil contract? When he is 33 years old? and his contract still has term?
Jeez well I guess in your world you call him good. We call him trash


Oh so because hes 33 and he got a contract he deserved, that means hes trash even though hes still scoring around 20? lmao leaf fans are too funny
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:28 p.m.
#35
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
So the deal is for Mitch Marner, And i'm saying it's a trash offer. 33 year old and a 32 year old College guy and late picks don't get you a player of Marners talent. So i stick with my statement that this is a trash offer.


"pittsburghs trash" to a "trash offer". Two totally different things. Trash is Jack Johnson, Dom Simon, Sheary, etc. A trash offer still has value but not enough value to attain someone like Marner
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:30 p.m.
#36
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 437
Likes: 138
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
Oh so because hes 33 and he got a contract he deserved, that means hes trash even though hes still scoring around 20? lmao leaf fans are too funny


Wow. You guys think a 33 year old 50point player is worth 5.3mil?
K now that's hilarious.
K how are leaf fans clueless? You can't call Hornqvist a good contract. Otherwise your watching the wrong sport
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:31 p.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
30, 21, 27, 22, 25, 22, 21, 29, 18 (69 games), 17 (52 games). But yeah, not a consistent 20 goal scorer. You call Marner a 90 point player, but only had 1 year even scoring over 70 points. So not sure why you can call Marner a 90 point player for 1 year, but say Hornqvist isn't a consistent 20 goal scorer. Once again, understand where my original point was. One guy said "pittsburghs trash". So thats where I said some of those pieces aren't trash. So no, it was not in relation to a trade for Marner.


again, i never said marner was a 90 point player, and you stated Hornqvist was a consistent 20 goal scorer. You wanted to be super pedantic about not mentioning Marner in a Marner trade thread, so im being super pedantic about Hornqvist not being a consistent 20 goal scorer because he hasnt consistently scored 20 goals in 3 years.

And back to the original point, These pieces are trash in respect to being traded for Marner. Wet, stinky trash
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:32 p.m.
#38
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: Leafsfan34
Wow. You guys think a 33 year old 50point player is worth 5.3mil?
K now that's hilarious.
K how are leaf fans clueless? You can't call Hornqvist a good contract. Otherwise your watching the wrong sport


I said a contract that is deserved and earned it.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:32 p.m.
#39
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 437
Likes: 138
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
I said a contract that is deserved and earned it.


Lol well your keeping it and nobody else is taking it. He is negative value to every other team
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
#40
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: Leafsfan34
Lol well your keeping it and nobody else is taking it. He is negative value to every other team


Thats fine. Maybe one day you'll see the opposite stance and realize players who are a big part of cup wins get paid.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:36 p.m.
#41
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
you shouldnt be drinking this much this early


I’m a huge Marner fan, but you’re kidding yourself if you don’t think this team is better than what they currently have.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:37 p.m.
#42
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1,491
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
again, i never said marner was a 90 point player, and you stated Hornqvist was a consistent 20 goal scorer. You wanted to be super pedantic about not mentioning Marner in a Marner trade thread, so im being super pedantic about Hornqvist not being a consistent 20 goal scorer because he hasnt consistently scored 20 goals in 3 years.

And back to the original point, These pieces are trash in respect to being traded for Marner. Wet, stinky trash


lmao ok then. Hes a consistent 17+ goal scorer. Better?
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:38 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
I’m a huge Marner fan, but you’re kidding yourself if you don’t think this team is better than what they currently have.


Yeah, you are definitely a Pens fan. There is no way in hell anyone who actually wanted the leafs to win this trade would think that Hornqvist replacing Marner and Jack johnson being on the team would make it better.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.
#44
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
So basically Pittsburghs trash for Mitch Marner, Good one screw the Leafs real bad.


May not be the best offer, but certainly not trash. The point is, this trades fills what Toronto needs. They’re getting a hardworking winger who drives to the net & goes to the dirty area, plus can put up 20-30 goals a season. They need more of that than Marner cuz the already have tons of skill.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Quoting: hockeyfanatic05
lmao ok then. Hes a consistent 17+ goal scorer. Better?


no, because i am being purposefully pedantic for no reason other than to be combative like someone else. He hasnt consistently scored 17 goals either. he has a different number than that most years
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:40 p.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,840
Likes: 7,410
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
May not be the best offer, but certainly not trash. The point is, this trades fills what Toronto needs. They’re getting a hardworking winger who drives to the net & goes to the dirty area, plus can put up 20-30 goals a season. They need more of that than Marner cuz the already have tons of skill.


lol, keep pushing that, this is decomposing compost of an offer. Utter trash for Marner and you know it.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:40 p.m.
#47
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Buffalo declines, well at least I'd hope they would.


I forgot to add Dermott.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#48
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, you are definitely a Pens fan. There is no way in hell anyone who actually wanted the leafs to win this trade would think that Hornqvist replacing Marner and Jack johnson being on the team would make it better.


Hornqvist is a really good player. Have you watched him play? Teams hate to play against him cuz of how aggressive he is. Best net front guy in the league. Johnson is not really a good defenseman anymore but he will be fine in a third pair role as long as he as a mobile partner, which Jokiharu is.
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#49
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 437
Likes: 138
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, you are definitely a Pens fan. There is no way in hell anyone who actually wanted the leafs to win this trade would think that Hornqvist replacing Marner and Jack johnson being on the team would make it better.


@MitchMarnerElite is a pens fan. He is not near leafs fan. More like a pens Marner fan.
Its like me liking the leafs and liking Patrick Kane but not Chicago
Mar. 29, 2020 at 12:45 p.m.
#50
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
no, because i am being purposefully pedantic for no reason other than to be combative like someone else. He hasnt consistently scored 17 goals either. he has a different number than that most years


Hornqvist is a 20 goal guy, what are you watching? Since coming to Pittsburgh, he’s been at a 20 goal pace every season.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll