SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CBO TRADE AND SIGN

Created by: Bruinsforlife
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 7, 2020
Published: Apr. 7, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$7,000,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Ladd, Andrew
  2. 2021 1st round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Nurse, Darnell
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
  3. 2020 1st round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
  2. Grzelcyk, Matt [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (BOS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$81,173,981$964,222$107,500$326,019
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,498,925$1,498,925
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 3
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 7, 2020 at 4:18 p.m.
#51
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 5,265
Likes: 2,154
Quoting: ON3M4N
Who are goal scoring wingers in your opinion? I'm looking for a list of names.


Ovie
Pasta
Connor
Laine
Kane
Kucherov
Marchand(cant argue with those goals, although i would consider him a 2 way playmaker before a goal scorer) Panarin is smilar in the sense where i would consider him a playmaker before goal scorer
Tarasenko,Boeser(although theyve had bad injury luck the past few years)
Hoffman
Before this year you can say Kessel as well.

you can argue a guy like Pacioretty as well, last 2 years havent as good for him but he seems to have kinda of a bounce back. theres others for arguments to be made
Apr. 7, 2020 at 4:25 p.m.
#52
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,505
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: vr1995
Ovie
Pasta
Connor
Laine
Kane
Kucherov
Marchand(cant argue with those goals, although i would consider him a 2 way playmaker before a goal scorer) Panarin is smilar in the sense where i would consider him a playmaker before goal scorer
Tarasenko,Boeser(although theyve had bad injury luck the past few years)
Hoffman
Before this year you can say Kessel as well.

you can argue a guy like Pacioretty as well, last 2 years havent as good for him but he seems to have kinda of a bounce back. theres others for arguments to be made


Ya again you just have insanely high standards for what a goal scorer is. With that im stepping out of this one because there really isn't anything further to discuss.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:21 p.m.
#53
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Isles777
A compliance buyout does not affect the cap, but you are saying the islanders do not have the money to buyout Ladd, which is not true. You don’t understand that a team doesn’t have to be profitable to have the cash to buyout a player.


No that is exactly what I am saying, and more importantly then myself: that is what the experts have been saying. Teams that are not profitable (arizona, NYI, Florida, Preds (though they are on the rise), even the ducks) do not have the income to waste money on buyouts. I KNOW it sounds crazy, that is why im saying I agree with you, but the experts are saying its the truth. I AGREE that the should be able to pay, but the INSIDERS are explaining that there teams DO NOT HAVE THE INCOME to pay a bought-out player.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.
#54
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: bsilk18
No that is exactly what I am saying, and more importantly then myself: that is what the experts have been saying. Teams that are not profitable (arizona, NYI, Florida, Preds (though they are on the rise), even the ducks) do not have the income to waste money on buyouts. I KNOW it sounds crazy, that is why im saying I agree with you, but the experts are saying its the truth. I AGREE that the should be able to pay, but the INSIDERS are explaining that there teams DO NOT HAVE THE INCOME to pay a bought-out player.


Some teams might not, the islanders do. Owners that Invested money into a 1.3 billion dollar arena have the money to buyout Andrew Ladd. It’s as simple as that...

Also the islanders have been a tenant at Barclays center, they do not own the arena. Barclays agreed years ago to pay the islanders 53 million per season no matter what. The islanders generate about 35 million in revenue, so Barclays center has been losing money on the islanders but the islanders still get paid.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:36 p.m.
#55
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Isles777
Some teams might not, the islanders do. Owners that Invested money into a 1.3 billion dollar arena have the money to buyout Andrew Ladd. It’s as simple as that...

Also the islanders have been a tenant at Barclays center, they do not own the arena. Barclays agreed years ago to pay the islanders 53 million per season no matter what. The islanders generate about 35 million in revenue, so Barclays center has been losing money on the islanders but the islanders still get paid.


You keep basing your argument on the islanders "not losing money" and "islanders generate about 35 million in revenue"

So im guessing you arent very into business: Here is a quick lesson
Revenue =/= Profit
Profit = Revenue - Expenses

The Islanders generate revenues yes, if the team didnt generate revenues, that would mean they arent selling any tickets, etc...
HOWEVER: Their EXPENSES are LARGER than their revenues, meaning that they are losing money every year.

I just found a third website: Forbes, which shows that they are producing 115million in revenue, but are losing 3.5million as a net loss (this means they have 118.5million in expenses, larger than their revenues)

So yes they are making money, but they are losing more than they are making, they can NOT afford to pay the costs of Ladds buyout. Case and Point.

PLEASE stop trying to argue, I know I am right, everyone else knows I am right, I am just trying to help you here. Please accept the help and stop making yourself look bad.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:42 p.m.
#56
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: bsilk18
You keep basing your argument on the islanders "not losing money" and "islanders generate about 35 million in revenue"

So im guessing you arent very into business: Here is a quick lesson
Revenue =/= Profit
Profit = Revenue - Expenses

The Islanders generate revenues yes, if the team didnt generate revenues, that would mean they arent selling any tickets, etc...
HOWEVER: Their EXPENSES are LARGER than their revenues, meaning that they are losing money every year.

I just found a third website: Forbes, which shows that they are producing 115million in revenue, but are losing 3.5million as a net loss (this means they have 118.5million in expenses, larger than their revenues)

So yes they are making money, but they are losing more than they are making, they can NOT afford to pay the costs of Ladds buyout. Case and Point.

PLEASE stop trying to argue, I know I am right, everyone else knows I am right, I am just trying to help you here. Please accept the help and stop making yourself look bad.[/quote

You seem like you have some sort of mental health issues, I would recommend you get help.

Again. It doesn’t matter if the islanders are losing money, they will still end up buyout Ladd this summer. There is no chance they are giving up assets to move ladds contract.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:43 p.m.
#57
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: bsilk18
You keep basing your argument on the islanders "not losing money" and "islanders generate about 35 million in revenue"

So im guessing you arent very into business: Here is a quick lesson
Revenue =/= Profit
Profit = Revenue - Expenses

The Islanders generate revenues yes, if the team didnt generate revenues, that would mean they arent selling any tickets, etc...
HOWEVER: Their EXPENSES are LARGER than their revenues, meaning that they are losing money every year.

I just found a third website: Forbes, which shows that they are producing 115million in revenue, but are losing 3.5million as a net loss (this means they have 118.5million in expenses, larger than their revenues)

So yes they are making money, but they are losing more than they are making, they can NOT afford to pay the costs of Ladds buyout. Case and Point.

PLEASE stop trying to argue, I know I am right, everyone else knows I am right, I am just trying to help you here. Please accept the help and stop making yourself look bad.


You seem like you have some sort of mental health issues, I would recommend you get help.

Again. It doesn’t matter if the islanders are losing money, they will still end up buying out Ladd this summer. There is no chance they are giving up assets to move ladds contract.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:46 p.m.
#58
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Isles777
You seem like you have some sort of mental health issues, I would recommend you get help.

Again. It doesn’t matter if the islanders are losing money, they will still end up buying out Ladd this summer. There is no chance they are giving up assets to move ladds contract.


Dude what? I am simply answering your question. you are so childish and immature for saying that. Im sorry if my knowledge of business offended you I guess. I genuinely dont know why you are that weird to have said that when you are losing an arguement.

I mean damn, I just gave you a whole business lesson and you said i "have mental health issues", like you do realize how hypocritical you look rn. Im loving this because this whole conversation and your last comment have made me look so much smarter
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:50 p.m.
#59
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: bsilk18
Dude what? I am simply answering your question. you are so childish and immature for saying that. Im sorry if my knowledge of business offended you I guess. I genuinely dont know why you are that weird to have said that when you are losing an arguement.

I mean damn, I just gave you a whole business lesson and you said i "have mental health issues", like you do realize how hypocritical you look rn. Im loving this because this whole conversation and your last comment have made me look so much smarter


😂😂😂 ok buddy keep thinking you’re right. Can’t wait to see your comments when the islanders buyout Ladd this summer.

You must be really successful in business!
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:55 p.m.
#60
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Isles777
😂😂😂 ok buddy keep thinking you’re right. Can’t wait to see your comments when the islanders buyout Ladd this summer.

You must be really successful in business!


I mean im at a great business school right now, was the president of my high school business club, and have already started a business in college. So Yeah.
Not tryna brag, but you did ask.

Obviously anything can happen, so we will see. Me and the experts are just tryna be logical about it
Bruinsforlife liked this.
Apr. 7, 2020 at 5:57 p.m.
#61
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: bsilk18
Dude what? I am simply answering your question. you are so childish and immature for saying that. Im sorry if my knowledge of business offended you I guess. I genuinely dont know why you are that weird to have said that when you are losing an arguement.

I mean damn, I just gave you a whole business lesson and you said i "have mental health issues", like you do realize how hypocritical you look rn. Im loving this because this whole conversation and your last comment have made me look so much smarter


And you’re right, it was an immature comment and I probably shouldn’t have said it.

That being said, you can think you’re right - obviously facts aren’t going to change your mind. Your arguments are subjective.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll