SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NYR Offer Sheet Cirelli

Created by: cbalzer28
Team: 2020-21 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: May 5, 2020
Published: May 5, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Offer Sheet Cirelli (Tampa is really tight on Cap and need to sign Cirelli and Sergachev and have Prospects ready to step in for Cirelli next season) to replace Strome, Sell high on Strome to fill spot on LD that Skjei trade opened. Atleast until some prospects like Nils, KAndre, Jones, or Robertson can step in. Minn needs a Center and has Def depth. And give them Rykov to fill in the hole from Brodin. Finally, not sure what Colin Wilson will cost but to fit under cap and coming off injury 1 yr prove it deal seemed fair but if not enough we can sign a cheaper option or use Barron/Diguiseppe instead
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
3$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,500,000
2$2,000,000
1$1,250,000
1$925,000
6$6,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Cirelli, Anthony$7,800,000
2021 1st round pick
2021 2nd round pick
2021 3rd round pick
Trades
1.
NYR
    CBO
    ANA
    1. Lundqvist, Henrik
    Additional Details:
    CBO
    2.
    MIN
    1. Rykov, Yegor
    2. Strome, Ryan [RFA Rights]
    Additional Details:
    Mixed feelings on Stromes value right now but let me know if this is enough for Brodin. Rykov fills his spot and gives Minn. A center after losing Koivu and Galchenyuk.
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the VAN
    2021
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    2022
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the NYR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$81,124,800$0$8,062,500$375,200

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,350,000$5,350,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW, RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $11,642,857$11,642,857
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
    RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $863,333$863,333
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    C, LW
    UFA
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $4,166,667$4,166,667
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $4,350,000$4,350,000
    LD/RD, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $5,700,000$5,700,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the New York Rangers
    $925,000$925,000
    LW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 5, 2020 at 4:11 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 981
    Likes: 228
    It really all depends on the CBO for NYR. Window would be open starting next season. If there's no CBO then I would save those Offer Sheet picks
    cbalzer28 liked this.
    May 5, 2020 at 4:40 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,737
    Likes: 1,565
    What you're essentially saying is that

    "1 year of Brodin" has more value than "4+ years of Strome"


    Rangers aren't going to pay much to fix their bottom 4 LHD issue.
    May 5, 2020 at 4:58 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 8,697
    Likes: 7,072
    No thanks on Strome for Brodin. Strome is good, but we need a better center than him if we're trading Brodin (Brodin was our best defenseman last year). If we can't get a better center than Strome, we're better off hanging on to Brodin and extending him
    May 5, 2020 at 5:03 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Casey B
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2018
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 9
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    What you're essentially saying is that

    "1 year of Brodin" has more value than "4+ years of Strome"


    Rangers aren't going to pay much to fix their bottom 4 LHD issue.


    Woops I thought it was 2 years of Brodin but you can always resign him he's young, and it will probably be 1 year of Strome as well.

    I just think the way the offseason is going right now that they wouldnt be able to agree on a 4 or 5 year deal with Strome. I would expect a 1 year or maybe 2 year deal because of cap space and the uncertainty of what he really is still. Specifically without Panarin on his wing and his rough defensive metrics/Penalties.
    May 5, 2020 at 5:16 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2016
    Posts: 4,253
    Likes: 2,971
    Only downside is that if the Rangers get a CBO so does Tampa and that gives them room to sign Cirelli and Sergachev
    May 5, 2020 at 5:30 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 6,737
    Likes: 1,565
    Quoting: cbalzer28
    Woops I thought it was 2 years of Brodin but you can always resign him he's young, and it will probably be 1 year of Strome as well.

    I just think the way the offseason is going right now that they wouldnt be able to agree on a 4 or 5 year deal with Strome. I would expect a 1 year or maybe 2 year deal because of cap space and the uncertainty of what he really is still. Specifically without Panarin on his wing and his rough defensive metrics/Penalties.


    You can't just resign a UFA that easily...I wouldn't bank on doing that, especially because that same year you also have to sign Chytil, Buch, Igor, Lindgren, and more!

    The reasons for the Rangers to deal Strome are
    a) He blocks Chytil whose development into the top 6 is paramount
    and
    b) Rangers are in a slight cap crunch needing to sign Deangelo long term, so because Strome would be a 3C on this team, it doesn't make sense for the Rangers to sign him,

    However, there are plenty of teams where Strome would be the 2C: Winnipeg, Anaheim, Columbus, Detroit, Florida, just to name a few.

    Find a team with a hole at 2C and a solid 3C to spare. work out the difference in picks. go from there.
    Widowmaker liked this.
    May 5, 2020 at 8:56 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Casey B
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2018
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 9
    Quoting: Sagecoll
    You can't just resign a UFA that easily...I wouldn't bank on doing that, especially because that same year you also have to sign Chytil, Buch, Igor, Lindgren, and more!

    The reasons for the Rangers to deal Strome are
    a) He blocks Chytil whose development into the top 6 is paramount
    and
    b) Rangers are in a slight cap crunch needing to sign Deangelo long term, so because Strome would be a 3C on this team, it doesn't make sense for the Rangers to sign him,

    However, there are plenty of teams where Strome would be the 2C: Winnipeg, Anaheim, Columbus, Detroit, Florida, just to name a few.

    Find a team with a hole at 2C and a solid 3C to spare. work out the difference in picks. go from there.


    Minnesota does need a Center (koivu, and Galchenyuk are gone and Staal is getting old) and I was just trying to find a whole to fill with Strome as opposed to just getting draft picks back. But you can make a trade with the implications of resigning prior to it like Stone did with VGK. Like I said though I thought it was 2 years of Brodin so that wouldve been worth it since this is the time to sell on Strome.

    As for the signings of Buch, Chytil and them I wouldn't worry about them until it gets there. They are RFAs besides Buch and not worth much yet. Still need to get through Expansion draft first.

    And clearly Minnesota fans (look at other comments above) think they can easily re sign Brodin lol. And Strome isnt enough for a year of Brodin so like I said his value is all over the board right now.
    May 5, 2020 at 8:57 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Casey B
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2018
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 9
    Quoting: Rangsey
    Only downside is that if the Rangers get a CBO so does Tampa and that gives them room to sign Cirelli and Sergachev


    True, I just dont know who they CBO that opens up enough Cap space to resign both of them to the numbers they want. Basically what I am saying is the Rangers could price the offer sheet out of Tampa Bay's Range if they want to.
    May 5, 2020 at 8:59 p.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Casey B
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2018
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 9
    Quoting: TanSor
    No thanks on Strome for Brodin. Strome is good, but we need a better center than him if we're trading Brodin (Brodin was our best defenseman last year). If we can't get a better center than Strome, we're better off hanging on to Brodin and extending him


    I dont know, like I said, Strome's Value is all over the board... he wouldve put up nearly 70 points this season as a 2C on a young team that could make the playoffs. He obviously has flaws but if you can't resign Brodin that is probably the skill you are getting for him as far as Centers go.
    TanSor liked this.
    May 5, 2020 at 10:02 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 8,697
    Likes: 7,072
    Quoting: cbalzer28
    I dont know, like I said, Strome's Value is all over the board... he wouldve put up nearly 70 points this season as a 2C on a young team that could make the playoffs. He obviously has flaws but if you can't resign Brodin that is probably the skill you are getting for him as far as Centers go.


    I think you're right, and that's kind of why I'm leaning towards a preference of keeping Brodin. He's so valuable to the Wild but not many outside of MN know it since he doesn't produce big point totals and isn't flashy with the puck. If we signed him to a $7M x 6 year extension today, I'd be more than happy with that.
    cbalzer28 liked this.
    May 6, 2020 at 10:20 a.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 193
    Likes: 70
    Quoting: sharks_1999
    It really all depends on the CBO for NYR. Window would be open starting next season. If there's no CBO then I would save those Offer Sheet picks


    Personally I’d rather trade strome for a first and third to make up for the loss of picks in the offer sheet plus I don’t think that would get Brodin.
    cbalzer28 liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll