Actually if you dive deeper into the stats you’ll find some thing you might now like. Bjorkstrand has much and I mean much better advanced stats this season Bjorkstrands, Corsi for % was 55.4% meaning when he was on the ice his team had the puck more then when he wasn’t on the ice, Domi was .5 behind in that but Bjorkstrands relative % was 5.8.... Domi was a -1.

If you want to talk about on ice. Bjorkstrand was on the ice for 40 goals this season but game up 28. Domi was on the ice for 54. 17 more but also gave up 57, 29 more against.

Bjorkstrand creates more offensive opportunities and give up less then Domi does. Sorry.

How about answering in the first place like a grown up man ? Have you try it ? You think that your remark was intelligent?

And how about the last 2 season ? You wanna talk about stats take a look at everysingle categorie that Domi is better. Bjorkstrand is not near Domi level. When Bjorkstrand will repeat that in a full season then maybe we will talk about it but for now it a complete joke. A guy who never reach 50 point once is suddenly better then a player who have been consistently on that mark.

Domi has hit 50 twice. Calm down. Points and goals are great but they aren’t everything. I’m using the same reference page you are btw and under standard you’re right. Start looking at more advanced stats you you’ll see Domi isn’t.

Bjorkstrand hasn’t ever given up more goals then he’s scored and is as 152 for in his career and 114 against. And his career Relative corsi for is at 2.6 so he get more shots then he gives up and his career corsi% is at 52.8, which means his line controls the puck more then he’s on the ice.

Domi’s career numbers are 238 goals for and 261 goals against and 3 of his 5 years he game up more then he scored. His Relative corsi number is -.8 in his career and -2.5 in Montreal(+.7 in ARI) and his Coris number is 49.6 in his career, meaning his team had the puck less then the other team when he was on the ice, though he is a 52.5 in MTL.

So in the surface Domi is better, but Bjorkstrand is better defensively in his career.

Ahahaha in surface Domi is better and underneath Domi is better. So Philip Danault is better then Pier luc Dubois, Sydney Crosby, Mcdavid, Draistail, Barzal, because is advance stats are all better then these players? So for you a guy who barely produced at a top 6 level is better then a players who have average consistently 50 point players because he is good defensively. Is that what you are saying?

Not what I’m saying. You’re being a homer. This conversation is over. Neither team is making this trade.

Ahaha so when its good for your players it is not applicable for the rest of the league.

Again... not what I’m saying. I was comparing 2 players and using ALL stats and game play. Not just advanced stats but you do you.

You can take all the number you want Domi have been better for the past 5 season. Each single year he had more point. More ice time, tougher attribution. By the way Andrew Aggozino had a relative corsinof 9.6 this years, that would made him better then Most of Nhl Players. Probably is worth a couple of first round pick by your standard

This is a ridiculous trade. This is a very bad trade for Columbus. Career basic stats mean nothing.

Ahahah pauvre ti loup! J’ai pitié de toi.

Haha don’t even try to argue with that guy. He’s a habs fan overvaluing his own team and making trades like it’s NHL 20. No way in hell Edm or Cbj accept that offer.

Bravo !!

You fight people until they agree with you. It's a known fact on this website.



Trades here are about more than value. You got a trade that might be alright in value if the picks are dropped, but you also have a player that CBJ is unwilling to move. He's essentially the Gallagher of CBJ. It's not always about pure points, rather here it's about the player trends. Bjorkstrand could very well be a late blooming 1st line player. You have to keep in mind that he is playing on a defense oriented team without any star power. His points will reflect that.
It was a worthy attempt, but in realism perspective it won't work. Please don't fight these people into trying to make them think it works.

Ahahah look who is talking! Just cut the crap out you are the biggest stuborn dude around this platform. Please don’t comment crap on my post

I wasn’t saying Bjorkstrand>>>> domi. I was more trying to get you to see that maybe they’re closer to equal then you say based on facts and not just my option. But you’re acting like you know everything and nothing anyone else says matters unless they agree with you. Then you spin what they say 180 degrees the other way to prove that they are wrong.

Domi better then Bjorkstrand but the gap isn’t worth giving up their 1st and why tf would edm do that when Russell cap is 1.5m next year.. use ur brain how does that make sense my friend. You’d actually think the way u make ur trades the habs would be the 1st place team in the nhl someone should do some re-evaluating

And you are still here trying to make me believe that a players who average .50 ppg is better then a players who have been better in each single season because he is a good defensive players. What difference are between you arguing that Bjorkstrand is better since the start of the evening. Why would you would be allow to argue about it and would be different then me sticking to my opinion?

Whatever. You’re the most stubborn person on here. Please stop. This conversation is over, we won’t agree on this. So continuing this is stupid. Please stop tagging me or you’ll be reported for harassment. Thank you and good day.

Giving up a first ?? swapping the 39th overall pick with the Columbus 18th overall pick is not like they are giving up a first. They just move back a few spot. Just like Edmonton received the 70th overall pick for a 4 millions cap dump and Lavoie. You said it like Montreal is acquiring Lavoie for absolutely nothing. The third round pick of the Habs is basically a late second round pick. And use your brain my friend Russell could have a dollar bill left on is deal he would still be accounted for 4 millions against the cap.

Lmao they are moving him for nothing and no need to move Russell as a cap dump not sure if u can read but after this year he’s making 1.5 m..? Edm could acquire a 5th for him why pay to move him no logic in that what so ever... 18th to 39th pretty big gap players fall all the time in drafts too it makes no sense for cbj.

Than why are you still harassing me is you are done?? You don’t have any obligation around here. And if you feel that way pursue you dream go a head signal me. I would like to see how you would plead your case.

Yeah and Brett Kulak will win the Norris next year. Not sure if you know the concept of cap hit ??

What does that have to do with anything LMAO why do u continue to embarrass yourself on this site..? Plz tell me? You know everyone just laughs at you look at the oilers situation they can resign their players and still almost have about 3.5m in space with no cap increase.. ya let’s rush our and trade assets for nothing makes so much sense! Smh see how stupid that sounds

What does that have to do with anything LMAO why do u continue to embarrass yourself on this site..? Plz tell me? You know everyone just laughs at you