SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Faksa

Created by: SevenLeg
Team: 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2020
Published: Jun. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
@SlevinKalevra idea
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,500,000
2$2,250,000
5$3,200,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,850,000
1$1,250,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. 2020 4th round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Benning, Matthew [RFA Rights]
2.
EDM
  1. 2020 4th round pick (FLA)
  2. 2021 4th round pick (FLA)
3.
EDM
  1. Faksa, Radek [RFA Rights]
DAL
  1. Larsson, Adam
Additional Details:
Larsson is extended 5x5
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,289,366$341,534$730,000$210,634
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$230,000$230K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$875,000$875,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 3
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$915,000$915,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2020 at 8:48 a.m.
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
If Larsson re-signs, then I'd maybe consider it.
SevenLeg and SlevinKalevra liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:05 a.m.
#2
Connor
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 635
I'd rather keep larsson, but if bouchard steps up I wouldn't be opposed to it.
SevenLeg liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:10 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
I have a tough time justifying signing AA personally don’t think he brings anything to the team.
Green if that’s what he wants it’s too much for me.
I wouldn’t move Larsson he fits in with the group well also brings an element of the game the others don’t have.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:17 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 38
I think value is pretty fair on Dallas deal, but Larsson wouldn't be first target in a trade. We do need RD, but would prefer someone who could push Klinger more to 2nd pairing if can find. Understood price will be higher, Faksa would be one piece, then becomes what other teams may be willing to part with that type of player, and at what additional cost. Options certainly aren't plenty.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:22 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 16,187
Likes: 20,498
Quoting: Karr31
I think value is pretty fair on Dallas deal, but Larsson wouldn't be first target in a trade. We do need RD, but would prefer someone who could push Klinger more to 2nd pairing if can find. Understood price will be higher, Faksa would be one piece, then becomes what other teams may be willing to part with that type of player, and at what additional cost. Options certainly aren't plenty.


Heiskanen-Larsson
Lindell-Klingberg

would be pretty good top 2 pairings
SlevinKalevra liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 9:24 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,486
NJ declines
Jun. 12, 2020 at 10:48 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: Karr31
I think value is pretty fair on Dallas deal, but Larsson wouldn't be first target in a trade. We do need RD, but would prefer someone who could push Klinger more to 2nd pairing if can find. Understood price will be higher, Faksa would be one piece, then becomes what other teams may be willing to part with that type of player, and at what additional cost. Options certainly aren't plenty.


We don’t draft well enough to have the pieces to get a high end RHD. Fox for an extended Larsson does good things for both teams imo
Jun. 12, 2020 at 11:02 a.m.
#8
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
We don’t draft well enough to have the pieces to get a high end RHD. Fox for an extended Larsson does good things for both teams imo


As long as the extension is made after 2020-21 season.

Otherwise we'd just lose the guy to Seattle.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 38
Quoting: SevenLeg
Heiskanen-Larsson
Lindell-Klingberg

would be pretty good top 2 pairings


Guess I'm just not sold Larsson is a top pair guy, if we made this deal imo Klinger likely stays up and plays with Miro majority of time.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 11:29 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 38
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
We don’t draft well enough to have the pieces to get a high end RHD. Fox for an extended Larsson does good things for both teams imo


Certainly changes current dynamic. Not my favorite option, but could work.
SlevinKalevra liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 1:28 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: Karr31
Certainly changes current dynamic. Not my favorite option, but could work.


For sure. Personally I’m very curious what Risto might look like with a high end partner like Miro and our strong forward support. Larsson or Risto or other right handed options make for some nice balance on the back end
Karr31 liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: justaBoss
As long as the extension is made after 2020-21 season.

Otherwise we'd just lose the guy to Seattle.


Or trade Lindell before the expansion for a young exempt forward. Assuming Harley is as good as I think he will be. Would leave us with

Miro-Klinger
Harley-Larsson
Jun. 12, 2020 at 1:46 p.m.
#13
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 31,451
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Or trade Lindell before the expansion for a young exempt forward. Assuming Harley is as good as I think he will be. Would leave us with

Miro-Klinger
Harley-Larsson


Meh. I'd rather keep Lindell. I dig the guy.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 1:53 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 38
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
For sure. Personally I’m very curious what Risto might look like with a high end partner like Miro and our strong forward support. Larsson or Risto or other right handed options make for some nice balance on the back end


Risto would be closer to what I'd like to see as well
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:30 p.m.
#15
Kafle
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 483
Quoting: Karr31
I think value is pretty fair on Dallas deal, but Larsson wouldn't be first target in a trade. We do need RD, but would prefer someone who could push Klinger more to 2nd pairing if can find. Understood price will be higher, Faksa would be one piece, then becomes what other teams may be willing to part with that type of player, and at what additional cost. Options certainly aren't plenty.


Wouldn't larsson just be replacement for kilngberg since they can't resign him
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:32 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: kafle22
Wouldn't larsson just be replacement for kilngberg since they can't resign him


Huh?
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:35 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: justaBoss
Meh. I'd rather keep Lindell. I dig the guy.


Fair. I just see a future left side of Miro and Harley. Obv Harley still has to show he can handle top four minutes
justaBoss liked this.
Jun. 12, 2020 at 2:38 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: Karr31
Risto would be closer to what I'd like to see as well


I wouldn’t be against giving Risto or Gardiner a look. I have no idea what Gardiner would be worth irl but seems like him being moved for a third round pick is pretty common around here. Which could be a steal for a guy that puts up positive possession numbers and has put up some pretty serious points in the past. And like Risto, could do well with a partner like Miro and strong forward support in his own end. We have too many guys that don’t have a strong possession game. I was actually surprised to hear this coming out of Bowness’ mouth but we are too “one and done” on offense and aren’t generating offensive possession and high danger chances. Gardiner for a third is a price I could live with and wouldn’t be overly upset if we lost him protecting Lindell
Jun. 12, 2020 at 4:25 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 38
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I wouldn’t be against giving Risto or Gardiner a look. I have no idea what Gardiner would be worth irl but seems like him being moved for a third round pick is pretty common around here. Which could be a steal for a guy that puts up positive possession numbers and has put up some pretty serious points in the past. And like Risto, could do well with a partner like Miro and strong forward support in his own end. We have too many guys that don’t have a strong possession game. I was actually surprised to hear this coming out of Bowness’ mouth but we are too “one and done” on offense and aren’t generating offensive possession and high danger chances. Gardiner for a third is a price I could live with and wouldn’t be overly upset if we lost him protecting Lindell


hmmm...Gardiner is tough for me. I like him on a 2nd PP unit, but I don't love his consistency 5v5. One interesting option someone put on here was Montour. Personally I love that idea. Would make things really difficult come expansion draft, but if you get the guy you want you're going to have tough decisions anyway. Thoughts?
Jun. 12, 2020 at 7:04 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: Karr31
hmmm...Gardiner is tough for me. I like him on a 2nd PP unit, but I don't love his consistency 5v5. One interesting option someone put on here was Montour. Personally I love that idea. Would make things really difficult come expansion draft, but if you get the guy you want you're going to have tough decisions anyway. Thoughts?


I’ve always loved Montour. His price tag would be quite a bit higher tho. They gave up a first rounder to get him
Karr31 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll