SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens 2020-2021

Created by: pens2021
Team: 2020-21 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 8, 2020
Published: Aug. 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
3$3,250,000
2$2,000,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
2$1,500,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. 2021 5th round pick (EDM)
2.
CGY
  1. Aston-Reese, Zach
  2. 2021 7th round pick (ANA)
3.
PIT
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Murray, Matt [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2021
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the COL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,850,175$0$850,000$3,649,825

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 9, 2020 at 1:00 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 431
Likes: 91
1 God no we don’t need someone as awful as Jack Johnson. Rutherford will either buy him out or bury him in the AHL

2 Calgary would never ever accept that trade. Bennett is a much better play than Aston-Reese

3 The Ave aren’t real desperate for goaltending so I think there are better places to send Murray. Murray and McCann would intrigue me as a Sens fan
Pensfan89 liked this.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 1:12 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: Ottawa67s
1 God no we don’t need someone as awful as Jack Johnson. Rutherford will either buy him out or bury him in the AHL

2 Calgary would never ever accept that trade. Bennett is a much better play than Aston-Reese

3 The Ave aren’t real desperate for goaltending so I think there are better places to send Murray. Murray and McCann would intrigue me as a Sens fan


Agreed, the pens are going to need to add a sweetener to get rid of JJ. I don’t think it’s as drastic as a 1st, but a solid prospect for certain.

As for Murray and McCann to the sens in a package, I’ve thrown that idea around if the pens win the draft lotto, they should package Murray, McCann and a solid forward prospect or 2 (Hallander, Legare, or Poulin) to try and get that 5th overall and go for Drysdale.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 6:57 a.m.
#3
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
No thanks on Murray. He looked very average against Montreal as well as most of this season, and is going to want to get paid based on his cup wins. Avs have no need to gamble in net as we have two good starting-calibre goalies signed to 2021 and 2022 respectively, along with one of the league's best goalie prospects in Annunen in the pipeline.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 9:37 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Ottawa67s
Calgary would never ever accept that trade. Bennett is a much better play than Aston-Reese


ZAR is so much better, it's not remotely close
Aug. 9, 2020 at 9:49 a.m.
#5
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: Dan10900
ZAR is so much better, it's not remotely close


Oh? Please explain to me how Zach Aston Reese is "so much better" and how it's "not remotely close".
Aug. 9, 2020 at 9:55 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 431
Likes: 91
Quoting: Dan10900
ZAR is so much better, it's not remotely close


He’s a fourth line PK guy. Sam can actually play hockey and put the puck in the net.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 9:58 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 431
Likes: 91
Quoting: Pensfan89
Agreed, the pens are going to need to add a sweetener to get rid of JJ. I don’t think it’s as drastic as a 1st, but a solid prospect for certain.

As for Murray and McCann to the sens in a package, I’ve thrown that idea around if the pens win the draft lotto, they should package Murray, McCann and a solid forward prospect or 2 (Hallander, Legare, or Poulin) to try and get that 5th overall and go for Drysdale.

If

If you guys win the lottery you could probably get both of our top 5 picks if you have us 1.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 10:04 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BurnEmUp
Oh? Please explain to me how Zach Aston Reese is "so much better" and how it's "not remotely close".


He is one of the best defensive players in the league (Bennet is average at best) and i wouldn't exactly consider a 1.11 P/60 all that much better than a 0.96
Aug. 9, 2020 at 10:06 a.m.
#9
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: Dan10900
He is one of the best defensive players in the league (Bennet is average at best) and i wouldn't exactly consider a 1.11 P/60 all that much better than a 0.96


lol, well I'm convinced. What an amazing argument you've made here.

"not remotely close" for sure
Aug. 9, 2020 at 10:08 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Ottawa67s
He’s a fourth line PK guy. Sam can actually play hockey and put the puck in the net.


If by put the puck into the net you mean score at a well below average rate, and barely above ZAR (who's job was not to score points when he was out), while being really not all that good defensively (and ZAR was one of the best defensive forwards in the game)
Aug. 9, 2020 at 10:09 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BurnEmUp
lol, well I'm convinced. What an amazing argument you've made here.

"not remotely close" for sure


idk what would convince you, people saying he should have been in Selke talks?
Aug. 9, 2020 at 10:11 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 431
Likes: 91
Quoting: Dan10900
If by put the puck into the net you mean score at a well below average rate, and barely above ZAR (who's job was not to score points when he was out), while being really not all that good defensively (and ZAR was one of the best defensive forwards in the game)


Aston-Reese has scored 18 goals in his entire career. Sam scores that many in his first full season in the league. He’s a much more talented player than ZAR that’s really not even debated. There’s a reason he was a first rounder.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 10:13 a.m.
#13
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: Dan10900
idk what would convince you, people saying he should have been in Selke talks?


People? Yeah, people say dumb stuff all the time.

But it shouldn't be really hard to convince anyone of something when "it isn't even remotely close"
Aug. 9, 2020 at 11:40 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 1,246
OTT laughs as they decline. Add a 1st
Aug. 9, 2020 at 11:41 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Ottawa67s
Aston-Reese has scored 18 goals in his entire career. Sam scores that many in his first full season in the league. He’s a much more talented player than ZAR that’s really not even debated. There’s a reason he was a first rounder.


So ovi is the best player in the league? He scores the most goals, that's the only thing that matters, it doesn't matter that his defensive play is horrible (like Bennett's compared to ZAR) or anything, or he gets extremely favorable deployment (Bennet does get more favorable deployment+PP time than ZAR) and talent wise sure he's a much more talented player, that doesn't make him have a better impact on the game, Nic Petan, Marko Dano, Jeremy Bracco, all very talented players, more talented than a large portion of NHLers, but they're not in the NHL for a reason, even a guy like Johnathan Drouin, in terms of raw talent, he probably has more than guys like ROR or Bergeron, but you'd be insane to say Drouin is better than those two lol
Aug. 9, 2020 at 11:56 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BurnEmUp
People? Yeah, people say dumb stuff all the time.

But it shouldn't be really hard to convince anyone of something when "it isn't even remotely close"


ZAR:
CA/60: 47.81
xGA/60: 1.58
GF%: 53.85
xGF%: 54.98
GF-xGA: 0.26
QoT: 0.099 (322nd overall, 206th among forwards]
Also had the highest EVD GAR among forwards league wide, and really good RAPM numbers
OZ start%: 31.03%

Sam Bennet:
CA/60: 57.94
xGA/60: 2.21
GF%: 48.57
xGF%: 52.59
GF-xGA: -0.49
QoT: -0.083 (396th overall, 251st for forwards, so he did have noticeably worse TM's overall, but ZAR does boost his TM's defensive stats bc they play so much together and he's that good, making his defensive QoT seem inflated)
OZ start%: 50.82% (and there goes any advantage he had in terms of "context")

But hur dur AdVaNcEd StAtS, I only like points and goals, not looking at how a player affects the game or how we can look at stats to get a good feel of how players will play next season, am i right!
Aug. 9, 2020 at 12:36 p.m.
#17
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: Dan10900
ZAR:
CA/60: 47.81
xGA/60: 1.58
GF%: 53.85
xGF%: 54.98
GF-xGA: 0.26
QoT: 0.099 (322nd overall, 206th among forwards]
Also had the highest EVD GAR among forwards league wide, and really good RAPM numbers
OZ start%: 31.03%

Sam Bennet:
CA/60: 57.94
xGA/60: 2.21
GF%: 48.57
xGF%: 52.59
GF-xGA: -0.49
QoT: -0.083 (396th overall, 251st for forwards, so he did have noticeably worse TM's overall, but ZAR does boost his TM's defensive stats bc they play so much together and he's that good, making his defensive QoT seem inflated)
OZ start%: 50.82% (and there goes any advantage he had in terms of "context")

But hur dur AdVaNcEd StAtS, I only like points and goals, not looking at how a player affects the game or how we can look at stats to get a good feel of how players will play next season, am i right!


Yeah exactly. Nothing I see there suggests that one is really any better than the other just like I thought, at least not enough to claim one is "so much better" and its "not even close". They're a couple of mid twenty year old 3rd/4th liners with very comparable value league wide.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: BurnEmUp
Yeah exactly. Nothing I see there suggests that one is really any better than the other just like I thought, at least not enough to claim one is "so much better" and its "not even close". They're a couple of mid twenty year old 3rd/4th liners with very comparable value league wide.


it's not about numbers it's about chemistry.
The chemistry on the 4th line is great. You don't touch it.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BurnEmUp
Yeah exactly. Nothing I see there suggests that one is really any better than the other just like I thought, at least not enough to claim one is "so much better" and its "not even close". They're a couple of mid twenty year old 3rd/4th liners with very comparable value league wide.


(Except one is way better than the other at his job according to the numbers)
Aug. 9, 2020 at 12:52 p.m.
#20
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: Dan10900
(Except one is way better than the other at his job according to the numbers)


Yeah, no those numbers don't really prove anything.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 12:53 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: BurnEmUp
Yeah, no those numbers don't really prove anything.


other than him preventing more than enough shots, and dangerous chances to make up for his lack of generating offense, yes those numbers mean nothing
Aug. 9, 2020 at 12:58 p.m.
#22
Yeah Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 322
Quoting: Dan10900
other than him preventing more than enough shots, and dangerous chances to make up for his lack of generating offense, yes those numbers mean nothing


I didn't say they "mean nothing". What they fail to do is prove your initial assertion, and that was that Aston-Reese is "so much better" than Bennett overall and that it was "not remotely close".
Aug. 9, 2020 at 6:55 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: Richard88
No thanks on Murray. He looked very average against Montreal as well as most of this season, and is going to want to get paid based on his cup wins. Avs have no need to gamble in net as we have two good starting-calibre goalies signed to 2021 and 2022 respectively, along with one of the league's best goalie prospects in Annunen in the pipeline.


How did he only play average vs mtl? Lol he had a .914 save percentage in 3 games. And that 3rd game was the 3rd pairing D’s worst game by far which left him out to dry. First goal by Weber he got spun around by Lehkonen after making the two initial saves. He had a wrap around goal against where he made the initial save before the wrap, the save on the wrap around, and while the d just stared watched Montreal poke at the rebound, and Petry’s goal was a perfect shot and nothing he could do on it.
I agree the avs shouldn’t go for murray. Just don’t know how he only played average when his only “bad game” was the game where Montreal’s goals came on their 3rd and fourth straight chances.
Aug. 9, 2020 at 6:58 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 1,440
Quoting: Ottawa67s
If

If you guys win the lottery you could probably get both of our top 5 picks if you have us 1.


Nahhh
Aug. 10, 2020 at 1:10 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 431
Likes: 91
Quoting: Dan10900
So ovi is the best player in the league? He scores the most goals, that's the only thing that matters, it doesn't matter that his defensive play is horrible (like Bennett's compared to ZAR) or anything, or he gets extremely favorable deployment (Bennet does get more favorable deployment+PP time than ZAR) and talent wise sure he's a much more talented player, that doesn't make him have a better impact on the game, Nic Petan, Marko Dano, Jeremy Bracco, all very talented players, more talented than a large portion of NHLers, but they're not in the NHL for a reason, even a guy like Johnathan Drouin, in terms of raw talent, he probably has more than guys like ROR or Bergeron, but you'd be insane to say Drouin is better than those two lol


But Sam Bennett does play defence too. I’ll take a guy that can score and plays the whole rink over a guy who’s a PK specialist
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll