SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playing with Carolina as a trade partner

Created by: SammyT_51
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 20, 2020
Published: Aug. 20, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I think this major trade is fair for both sides in terms of what they need, look for and would be willing to pay to acquire what they want.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
3$2,250,000
2$725,000
2$725,000
2$725,000
3$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,250,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Pesce, Brett
  2. Trocheck, Vincent
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Carolina needs scoring, goaltending
Leafs need defense and depth scoring
CAR
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Nylander, William
Additional Details:
And no, I dont think Andersen would have issues playing for Carolina who he declined to play for when their 50yo head coach was still active player.. different ownership, different team, different coaching, different management. Its completely different team so shut the fuck up.
2.
TOR
  1. Murray, Matt [RFA Rights]
PIT
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
Additional Details:
No, Murrays value is not Kapanen+++++.
3.
TOR
  1. Anderson, Josh [RFA Rights]
CBJ
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (CAR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$81,403,250$0$400,000$96,750

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 4
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:56 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 587
I'd have very litte confidence in Murray in goal.

He is poor
mikearky liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:58 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Gordon_Bombay
I'd have very litte confidence in Murray in goal.

He is poor


He needs a change of scenery, you are not .920+ stanley cup level goalie and then forget how to do it.. too many factors against him in pittsburgh.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:02 a.m.
#3
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
This was...pretty aggressive...

So, Carolina is pretty much screwed if Dougie doesn't resign...you know that, right?

The Canes also scored 3.26 gpg (That's without Dougie for 20 games). The Leafs, with their vaunted offense, scored 3.4 gpg. Not a huge difference.
On the other end, the Canes allowed 2.83 gpg, whereas the Leafs allowed 3.24. One of these teams was playing with Reimer and Marazek.

Why on earth would Carolina sacrifice their D (In a major way, by the way), to change the way that they play?

It's also funny that you're trading Kerfoot, a 3C, for a guy who you think has very little value, then you're firing him in as your starter. You get why that's foolish, right?
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:11 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Lenny7
This was...pretty aggressive...

So, Carolina is pretty much screwed if Dougie doesn't resign...you know that, right?

The Canes also scored 3.26 gpg (That's without Dougie for 20 games). The Leafs, with their vaunted offense, scored 3.4 gpg. Not a huge difference.
On the other end, the Canes allowed 2.83 gpg, whereas the Leafs allowed 3.24. One of these teams was playing with Reimer and Marazek.

Why on earth would Carolina sacrifice their D (In a major way, by the way), to change the way that they play?

It's also funny that you're trading Kerfoot, a 3C, for a guy who you think has very little value, then you're firing him in as your starter. You get why that's foolish, right?


They are not changing the way they play. They are getting better while getting much better goaltending (yes, Andersen is levels better than both Mrazek and Reimer combined). They would re-sign Dougie.. he loves it there and they love him there. No reason to not sign him.

Leafs would sacrifice their F in a major way too in that deal, you dont look at that either. Its sacrifice for sacrifice so both teams get better overall. Simple..

Murray needs a change of scenery, lost his job in Pittsburgh and hates it there. Those guys dont have starter value even though they would later play starter role. But I think change of scenery would help him get back into form he was in couple years back. Thats why I traded for him. And no, Murrays value is not Kapanen++++ on the market.. thats foolish.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:20 a.m.
#5
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: SammyT_51
They are not changing the way they play. They are getting better while getting much better goaltending (yes, Andersen is levels better than both Mrazek and Reimer combined). They would re-sign Dougie.. he loves it there and they love him there. No reason to not sign him.

Leafs would sacrifice their F in a major way too in that deal, you dont look at that either. Its sacrifice for sacrifice so both teams get better overall. Simple..

Murray needs a change of scenery, lost his job in Pittsburgh and hates it there. Those guys dont have starter value even though they would later play starter role. But I think change of scenery would help him get back into form he was in couple years back. Thats why I traded for him. And no, Murrays value is not Kapanen++++ on the market.. thats foolish.


I think we've all seen what happens when you sacrifice defence for offense though, right?

Aho, Teuvo and Svech make up a pretty great, young offensive core, then you add Necas who looks to be heading in the right direction, plus a likely bounce back from Trochek, if he can stay healthy. I'm not sure why I'd want to change that, especially when my D-core is as solid as it is?

As for Murray, I'm not saying he's worth Kapanen++++. He's definitely worth more than a 3C though.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:21 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Carolina aren't moving Trocheck. Sure, he's not had the end product, but his ability to create chances in his 16 games as a Cane have been amazing. Pesce for Nylander works 1 for 1. Andersen and Kapanen for Trocheck and a 2nd is no. Carolina will not move someone who was a long time target that they acquired at the deadline.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:22 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Caniac2000
Carolina aren't moving Trocheck. Sure, he's not had the end product, but his ability to create chances in his 16 games as a Cane have been amazing. Pesce for Nylander works 1 for 1. Andersen and Kapanen for Trocheck and a 2nd is no. Carolina will not move someone who was a long time target that they acquired at the deadline.


For the best goalie they probably ever had in their franchise history I think they would sacrifice a 2nd liner..
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:23 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: SammyT_51
For the best goalie they probably ever had in their franchise history I think they would sacrifice a 2nd liner..


Andersen was worse this year than Reimer. No thanks
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:25 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Caniac2000
Andersen was worse this year than Reimer. No thanks


Andersen is levels better than Reimer. But if Reimer is enough for you (lol), so be it!
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:27 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: SammyT_51
Andersen is levels better than Reimer. But if Reimer is enough for you (lol), so be it!


Yes, the goalie who was significantly worse this year is a better goalie!
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:28 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Caniac2000
Yes, the goalie who was significantly worse this year is a better goalie!


Andersen on Carolina is .930+ goalie. Compare what Reimer has in front of him and what Andersen has in front of him.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:30 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: SammyT_51
He needs a change of scenery, you are not .920+ stanley cup level goalie and then forget how to do it.. too many factors against him in pittsburgh.

Except that he hasn’t been a .either of those since 16-17. Literally his save percentage has dropped every year since to this year when he was a sub .900.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:31 a.m.
#13
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 1,250
If Canes go for Andersen I would puke, Id much rather trade for Murray, or just draft Askarov haha
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:33 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: jslongo
If Canes go for Andersen I would puke, Id much rather trade for Murray, or just draft Askarov haha


Why would you puke lol?
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:34 a.m.
#15
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 1,250
Quoting: SammyT_51
Why would you puke lol?


Dont want him on the Canes haha

Id rather have another Tbay boy
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:36 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: jslongo
Dont want him on the Canes haha

Id rather have another Tbay boy


I mean.. he is an awesome goalie who would be like .930 on Canes. I dont get it lol
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:40 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: SammyT_51
Andersen on Carolina is .930+ goalie. Compare what Reimer has in front of him and what Andersen has in front of him.


He wouldn't though. Toronto's defence this year was analytically better than Carolina's. That is the Joel Edmundson affect. Andersen actually had a better D core in front of him, because Carolina's blueline was so injured.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:44 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Caniac2000
He wouldn't though. Toronto's defence this year was analytically better than Carolina's. That is the Joel Edmundson affect. Andersen actually had a better D core in front of him, because Carolina's blueline was so injured.


He would though. Toronto missed Rielly and Muzzin for chunks of year and played rookies in top-4 regularly.. Toronto also had D core that was really injured the whole year..

Carolinas defense is much better than Torontos.. however I do agree that Andersen had a down year compared to being a really consistent .915-.920 goalie every single year.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:46 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: SammyT_51
He would though. Toronto missed Rielly and Muzzin for chunks of year and played rookies in top-4 regularly.. Toronto also had D core that was really injured the whole year..

Carolinas defense is much better than Torontos.. however I do agree that Andersen had a down year compared to being a really consistent .915-.920 goalie every single year.


Carolina's defence at the end of the season was Slavin and 5 pylons.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:47 a.m.
#20
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Caniac2000
Carolina's defence at the end of the season was Slavin and 5 pylons.


Didnt they like acquire Vatanen, Skjei and guys like that at the deadline to boost their blueline even more? Was it that bad?
Aug. 20, 2020 at 7:48 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,537
Likes: 5,032
Quoting: SammyT_51
Didnt they like acquire Vatanen, Skjei and guys like that at the deadline to boost their blueline even more? Was it that bad?


Vatanen, Hamilton, and Pesce were all on IR. Skjei was shakey, TvR was not himself, Fleury started to turn a corner, but wasn't great. Jake Gardiner on a down year was our 2nd best D man by some distance
Aug. 20, 2020 at 8:23 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Wow that’s a big splash. Would think easily no from Carolina. They don’t really need to make such a big move.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 8:34 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,708
Likes: 7,377
Quoting: Timmah007
Wow that’s a big splash. Would think easily no from Carolina. They don’t really need to make such a big move.


I dunno, they didn't even make it out of the first round and even the leafs took the bruins to 7. They will never win build like this and need to competly re arange how the team is built
Aug. 20, 2020 at 9:11 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I dunno, they didn't even make it out of the first round and even the leafs took the bruins to 7. They will never win build like this and need to competly re arange how the team is built


I’d agree with that statement about the leafs but Carolina is only tweeks away from having a team capable of deep run.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 9:19 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,708
Likes: 7,377
Quoting: Timmah007
I’d agree with that statement about the leafs but Carolina is only tweeks away from having a team capable of deep run.


Nope, they cant even make it past the first round. Too flawed. Need grit and leadership
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll