SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kuokkanen

Created by: GenericUsername489
Team: 2020-21 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 26, 2020
Published: Aug. 26, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
What is Kuokkanen's value? Trade is for Johnsson because a Leafs trade will get a few more clicks. I think he's currently the Devils #4 prospect and after the draft he probably drops to #6 just because of where the Devils are drafting.
Trades
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2021
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NJD
2022
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
14$81,500,000$43,744,430$0$3,350,000$37,755,570
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,325,000$2,325,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,875,000$2,875,000
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,822,764$2,822,764
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 26, 2020 at 2:50 a.m.
#1
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 932
Based on what the Leafs got for Kapanen, Johnsson's value should be somewhere around the Devils latest 1st round pick (ideally, Vancouver I would think) plus someone like Kuokkanen, or McLeod. I have always liked Kuokkanen's game, he plays a solid defensive game, and sure the Leafs could use depth at center behind Matthews and Tavares, but I do not consider Kuokkanen's projectability beyond a bottom-6, and that would be generous. I would actually project the Leaf's newest prospect, Hallander, as having a higher ceiling than Koukkanen, even though he may not be as NHL-ready.
GenericUsername489 liked this.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 2:59 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
GenericUsername489
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 638
Likes: 259
Quoting: MG1986
Based on what the Leafs got for Kapanen, Johnsson's value should be somewhere around the Devils latest 1st round pick (ideally, Vancouver I would think) plus someone like Kuokkanen, or McLeod. I have always liked Kuokkanen's game, he plays a solid defensive game, and sure the Leafs could use depth at center behind Matthews and Tavares, but I do not consider Kuokkanen's projectability beyond a bottom-6, and that would be generous. I would actually project the Leaf's newest prospect, Hallander, as having a higher ceiling than Koukkanen, even though he may not be as NHL-ready.


I appreciate your take but just one thing: I don't think any trade should have its value compared to what happened with Kapanen. That just seems like JR being JR and not something that most GMs would consider. Until more trades like these occur, I think us fans have to consider this trade an anomaly.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 5:37 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,480
Likes: 18,452
Quoting: MG1986
Based on what the Leafs got for Kapanen, Johnsson's value should be somewhere around the Devils latest 1st round pick (ideally, Vancouver I would think) plus someone like Kuokkanen, or McLeod. I have always liked Kuokkanen's game, he plays a solid defensive game, and sure the Leafs could use depth at center behind Matthews and Tavares, but I do not consider Kuokkanen's projectability beyond a bottom-6, and that would be generous. I would actually project the Leaf's newest prospect, Hallander, as having a higher ceiling than Koukkanen, even though he may not be as NHL-ready.


NJD should neither do Koukkanen for Johnsson nor a 1st for Johnsson (and certainly not both for Johnsson).

Maltsev + a 2021 4th is probably about right for Johnsson

Koukkanen + 1st should get Sandin, Liljergren, Robertson, etc level of return
Aug. 26, 2020 at 7:21 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 3,040
Quoting: GenericUsername489
I appreciate your take but just one thing: I don't think any trade should have its value compared to what happened with Kapanen. That just seems like JR being JR and not something that most GMs would consider. Until more trades like these occur, I think us fans have to consider this trade an anomaly.


You've got to consider the trades but you dont have to replicate them. If anything, the Kapanen trade shows us that as 40ish point winger isnt worth the 3rd round pick everyone around here valued Johnsson at. The valuation was absurd to start with and we've now been shown it was way off.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 7:48 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 1,992
You won the Kappy trade for sure.
But there is no way Fitz is giving that up for a guy who is dinged up as much as AJ. Could you get Mcleid for him 1for1, sure. A furst is laughable. Enjoy that you beat Rutherford, it won't just continue that way
GenericUsername489 liked this.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 11:28 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
GenericUsername489
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 638
Likes: 259
Quoting: Smitty426
You won the Kappy trade for sure.
But there is no way Fitz is giving that up for a guy who is dinged up as much as AJ. Could you get Mcleid for him 1for1, sure. A furst is laughable. Enjoy that you beat Rutherford, it won't just continue that way


I assume too much for AJ is the guy saying Kuokkanen/McLeod ana a 1st. Is just Kuokkanen fine for AJ since you said McLeod 1 for 1 is possible?
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:01 p.m.
#7
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 932
Quoting: NHLfan10506
NJD should neither do Koukkanen for Johnsson nor a 1st for Johnsson (and certainly not both for Johnsson).

Maltsev + a 2021 4th is probably about right for Johnsson

Koukkanen + 1st should get Sandin, Liljergren, Robertson, etc level of return


Haha I just love how people still give so little love (and perhaps respect) to young top-6, or at least fringe top-6 players that have 20 goals under their belt with good AAV and term. Sure, he got sidelined with a leg injury but if nothing else in game 5 versus Columbus, Keefe showcased the fact that Johnsson is full recovered. He should get the Leafs a late 1st, early 2nd plus a good prospect, if the team wanted to go that route. Fans can huff and puff and say whatever they want, but the Kappy comp is fresh and its out there, so just accept that.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:04 p.m.
#8
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 932
Quoting: GenericUsername489
I appreciate your take but just one thing: I don't think any trade should have its value compared to what happened with Kapanen. That just seems like JR being JR and not something that most GMs would consider. Until more trades like these occur, I think us fans have to consider this trade an anomaly.


A comp is a comp. Every circumstance or situation differs slightly from one GM to another when making these trades, especially this excuse that JR was under some sort of enormous pressure to pull the trigger on something and had no other choice. Once a trade comp is out there, especially as fresh as it is, it will be used for future dealings. So, look to young fringe top-6 to get similar value to Kapanen, and you can accept that, or not, but that's how the business of hockey trades work. Value goes up and down on a player in a large part to market value, which is often taken from comps. You, like so many others, may choose to disagree, but that's how trading in the NHL largely works, especially when you are dealing with future packages, as opposed to more hockey-esque style trades.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:18 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,480
Likes: 18,452
Quoting: MG1986
Haha I just love how people still give so little love (and perhaps respect) to young top-6, or at least fringe top-6 players that have 20 goals under their belt with good AAV and term. Sure, he got sidelined with a leg injury but if nothing else in game 5 versus Columbus, Keefe showcased the fact that Johnsson is full recovered. He should get the Leafs a late 1st, early 2nd plus a good prospect, if the team wanted to go that route. Fans can huff and puff and say whatever they want, but the Kappy comp is fresh and its out there, so just accept that.


Johnsson is a 25 year-old with 30 career goals. If a team offers a 1st + prospect for him, take it and run!

Quoting: MG1986
A comp is a comp. Every circumstance or situation differs slightly from one GM to another when making these trades, especially this excuse that JR was under some sort of enormous pressure to pull the trigger on something and had no other choice. Once a trade comp is out there, especially as fresh as it is, it will be used for future dealings. So, look to young fringe top-6 to get similar value to Kapanen, and you can accept that, or not, but that's how the business of hockey trades work. Value goes up and down on a player in a large part to market value, which is often taken from comps. You, like so many others, may choose to disagree, but that's how trading in the NHL largely works, especially when you are dealing with future packages, as opposed to more hockey-esque style trades.


True, GMs act in a market place, where prices set by the participants.

However, the PIT trade probably says more about the weakness of the 2020 draft....than it does tell us anything about other players like Johnsson.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:27 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
GenericUsername489
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 638
Likes: 259
Quoting: NHLfan10506
True, GMs act in a market place, where prices set by the participants.

However, the PIT trade probably says more about the weakness of the 2020 draft....than it does tell us anything about other players like Johnsson.


The weakness of the 2020 draft? As in this draft class is bad?
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:30 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 340
Likes: 103
Quoting: NHLfan10506
NJD should neither do Koukkanen for Johnsson nor a 1st for Johnsson (and certainly not both for Johnsson).

Maltsev + a 2021 4th is probably about right for Johnsson

Koukkanen + 1st should get Sandin, Liljergren, Robertson, etc level of return


I think the Devils should let guys like Kuokkanen and Maltsev play and see who shakes out. If they need stop gap veteran talent, they should utilize free agency and cap dumps.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:37 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,480
Likes: 18,452
Quoting: GenericUsername489
The weakness of the 2020 draft? As in this draft class is bad?


The 2020 draft class, as a whole, is average - but mostly gets good ratings because the strength of the forwards at the top of the class. Once you are past pick 10-12, it is a rather weak draft.

It is a good year to trade from back-half of 1st round. In other words... picks #16-31 in 2019 and 2021 will be better than picks #16-31 this year.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 2:44 p.m.
#13
#LeafsFever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 932
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Johnsson is a 25 year-old with 30 career goals. If a team offers a 1st + prospect for him, take it and run!



True, GMs act in a market place, where prices set by the participants.

However, the PIT trade probably says more about the weakness of the 2020 draft....than it does tell us anything about other players like Johnsson.


I am not even sure what the say here. The 2020 draft, especially the first round, is a very deep draft. Where are you getting all this stuff?
Aug. 26, 2020 at 3:23 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,480
Likes: 18,452
Quoting: MG1986
I am not even sure what the say here. The 2020 draft, especially the first round, is a very deep draft. Where are you getting all this stuff?


Depends on where you pick!

The 2020 class is above-average for the top dozen or so players. Below-average for next 30-40. Then average-to-slightly-above-average for rest.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll