I like the concept of Nylander + 15oa for Parayko + Barbashev, but that's only if we keep Pietrangelo and Dunn and have an avenue to stay below the cap (moving bozak, steen, allen, etc). Def don't need Johnsson coming back, I've never been very high on Liljegren personally, and I doubt the Leafs could move Sandin or Robertson.
Why would you want Marner? Parayko is more important than adding Marner especially when you have Tarasenko,Perron,Thomas,Kyrou,Kostin as your RW's.
Game changing forward at affordable rate. A lot of those guys can play LW/C too. Parayko could be packaged for Matthews too but no chance TOR moves him before he walks in FA.
I like the concept of Nylander + 15oa for Parayko + Barbashev, but that's only if we keep Pietrangelo and Dunn and have an avenue to stay below the cap (moving bozak, steen, allen, etc). Def don't need Johnsson coming back, I've never been very high on Liljegren personally, and I doubt the Leafs could move Sandin or Robertson.
This makes a lot of sense.
99.9% chance it doesn't happen, but IMO this would be the mostly like scenario (or close to it).
Marner with a mil or two retained or an obscene package. Don’t want Nylander or that fake rumor of Johnsson/Lilj/1st.
That's interesting. Like I say the trade would probably never happen because the pieces might not be there for the Blues, just wondering what the consensus of a fair return is.
That's interesting. Like I say the trade would probably never happen because the pieces might not be there for the Blues, just wondering what the consensus of a fair return is.
Whatever it takes to get him is probably too much.
That's interesting. Like I say the trade would probably never happen because the pieces might not be there for the Blues, just wondering what the consensus of a fair return is.
I mean practically speaking, if Kapanen and spare parts can get a first and some okay prospects, Parayko is gonna get a haul if he ever gets traded (doubtful)