Tuukka stays Krug leaves

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: Silkysmooth42

Trust me, any team that needs to round out their top 6 defense will gladly take him for free. Its a free roster player.

Lmao free? Playing 2.75mil x 3 yr with two years of frozen cap isn’t free, especially for an AHL/ borderline NHL caliber player

Sep. 2, 2020 at 7:54 p.m.

#28

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: Silkysmooth42

( @leafs_and_sens_fan)

( @McGruff @bhavikp27 @McRanteskog @hines10 @csick @OldNYIfan @sevenleg )
Lol this guy wont stop so im gonna settle this right here right now.

OVER 3 YEARS:

https://stathead.com/hockey/pcomp_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=1&player_id1_hint=John+Moore&player_id1_select=John+Moore&player_id1=moorejo01&idx=hr__players&p1yrfrom=2018&p1yrto=2020&player_id2_hint=Jack+Johnson&player_id2_select=Jack+Johnson&player_id2=johnsja02&idx=hr__players&p2yrfrom=2018&p2yrto=2020

Jack Johnson is 4 years OLDER than John Moore
Jack Johnson is on a weaker and less deep PIT defense (meaning more opportuinity), while missing only 5 games over the past 3 years, Moore is fighting with 7 other guys for top 6 time and has missed nearly 25 games to injury and more to Lauzon and Clifton and Griz... Yet they have the SAME AMOUNT OF POINTS
Johnson has a NEGATIVE OPS, Moores isnt good, but its POSITIVE
Johnson is a -11 and Moore is a +1

IM NOT SAYING MOORE IS GOOD, but we all know FOR A FACT that John Moore is NOT like Jack Johnson and is NOT a cap dump.

So no more "opinions" bud, start using facts like the rest of us do.

Jack Johnson > John Moore

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:04 p.m.

#29

Joined: Jun. 2016

Posts: 12,583

Likes: 5,455

Quoting: McRanteskog

Jack Johnson > John Moore

Yikes

Silkysmooth42 liked this.

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:07 p.m.

#30

UncleRay

Uncle Ray

Joined: Jun. 2018

Posts: 94

Likes: 2

Chicago is in Cap trouble. Ritchie does nothing for them. They need 2 goalies and to sign Strome and Kubalik.

Moore is actually quite serviceable as a 2nd pair D on a team that is struggling. He’s be better than 4 of 6 of Toronto Dmen.

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:37 p.m.

#31

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: bhavikp27

Yikes

Yes the truth hurts, you’ll be fine.
We out here comparing 6/7 Dman, let’s get real here lol

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:42 p.m.

#32

Joined: Jun. 2016

Posts: 12,583

Likes: 5,455

Quoting: McRanteskog

Yes the truth hurts, you’ll be fine.
We out here comparing 6/7 Dman, let’s get real here lol

Either you have never watched Moore play or you're overrating Johnson. Not a Moore fan and I'm not that confident when he plays but saying Johnson is better is just stupid. Maybe you should watch other teams play rather than just watch one team.

He's a #6D, Johnson isn't even an #8th. That's like saying Compher > Landeskog.

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:45 p.m.

#33

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: bhavikp27

Lmao, damn, struck a nerve huh?
You actually wanna get into a debate of bottom pairing Dman? Seriously? Move along

May not watch a ton of PIT / BOS games but you are taking a pretty homer stance right now

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:48 p.m.

#34

Joined: Jun. 2016

Posts: 12,583

Likes: 5,455

Quoting: McRanteskog

Well, don't say stupid stuff and we won't. It's not being homer, ask people that know hockey, they will let you know what happens in the other conference.

Johnson sucked in February when he had to move up at LD1 for Dumoulin with Letang and that's the reason PIT had to play in the play-in. How many goals against because of Johnson in the play-in? A lot.

Sep. 2, 2020 at 10:56 p.m.

#35

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: bhavikp27

Well, don't say stupid stuff and we won't. It's not being homer, ask people that know hockey, they will let you know what happens in the other conference.

I live in TO, I catch a fair share of Atlantic division hockey, don’t you worry.

I’ll admit that Moore’s defensive numbers were better than Johnson’s, no doubt, my issue is that Moore played about 30% of the minutes Johnson did.

Look at Moore’s career, all the injury’s.
He’s been in the league 10 seasons, I’ll deduct his rookie year (played 2 games) so let’s call it 9 seasons. In 9 seasons he played 70+ games only 3 times (12-13 short year he was hurt, this years short season he was hurt)

Any advantage Moore has for being better than Johnson is quickly nullified by the fact HES ALWAYS INJURED.

Make sense?

ZiggyPalffy liked this.

Sep. 3, 2020 at 10:24 a.m.

#36

MMBzFan

Joined: Apr. 2016

Posts: 1,111

Likes: 281

Lindholm doesn’t need to be bought out. Like the Toffoli and Dillon signings.

Sep. 3, 2020 at 10:32 a.m.

#37

Banned

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 4,561

Likes: 1,266

Quoting: McRanteskog

Yes the truth hurts, you’ll be fine.
We out here comparing 6/7 Dman, let’s get real here lol

The problem is, its isnt the truth. Its literally the opposite of the truth. I literally just proved that Moore is much better, with facts.
Why cant yall get facts in your head damn.

Quoting: bhavikp27

Like this is just facts

Sep. 3, 2020 at 10:34 a.m.

#38

Banned

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 4,561

Likes: 1,266

Quoting: mhockey91

If Krug walks, your team needs a top 4 LHD replacement. Lauzon definitely isn’t that. Without krug, and a retired Chara, Boston’s D will go from among the best to pretty average

I mean griz is a top 4 dman, and Lauzon is top 6, but yeah they would need a top pair dman to play with Mcavoy.
In saying that, their defense DOESNT become "pretty average", still got Mcavoy, Carlo, Clifton down the right side, and still got x, Griz, Lauzon down the left side. Not bad. But yeah that x has to be someone ok

mhockey91 liked this.

Sep. 3, 2020 at 10:38 a.m.

#39

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: Silkysmooth42

The problem is, its isnt the truth. Its literally the opposite of the truth. I literally just proved that Moore is much better, with facts.
Why cant yall get facts in your head damn.

Like this is just facts

the fact is that any upside Moore has over Johnson is quickly negated by the fact that Moore.cant.stay.healthy.
82 game Moore > 82 game Johnson
82 game Johnson > 65 game Moore

ZiggyPalffy liked this.

Sep. 3, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.

#40

Joined: Jun. 2016

Posts: 12,583

Likes: 5,455

Quoting: McRanteskog

the fact is that any upside Moore has over Johnson is quickly negated by the fact that Moore.cant.stay.healthy.
82 game Moore > 82 game Johnson
82 game Johnson > 65 game Moore

Reason #1 Moore didn't play was because of our depth. He's the #8D on the depth chart. PIT do have 7 better dmen but for whatever stupid reason, Sullivan keeps him in the lineup.
You don't want Jack Johnson for 82 games.

Silkysmooth42 liked this.

Sep. 3, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.

#41

RETIRED

Joined: Apr. 2019

Posts: 4,846

Likes: 2,481

Quoting: bhavikp27

Listen, ive made my stance, youve made your stance, we both slept on it, i havent changed my mind, you havent changed your mind, can we move on already.
never has so much effort been put into over analyzing #6-7D men...

ZiggyPalffy liked this.

Sep. 3, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.

#42

Banned

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 4,561

Likes: 1,266

Quoting: McRanteskog

the fact is that any upside Moore has over Johnson is quickly negated by the fact that Moore.cant.stay.healthy.
82 game Moore > 82 game Johnson
82 game Johnson > 65 game Moore

Quoting: bhavikp27

Lol @bhavikp27 him and @Bf3351 literally just dont care to read all that I wrote (which was all real and true). Its pointless to continue arguing with them
I just dont get why they cant leave bruins posts alone. Clearly they arent wanted there

Sep. 3, 2020 at 3:37 p.m.

#43

ZiggyPalffy

Banned

Joined: May 2018

Posts: 9,721

Likes: 2,805

Quoting: Silkysmooth42

I read all of it and as I stated before, none of that has anything to do with a team taking Moore and his contract for free. You completely ignore the flat cap. I'm starting to wonder if you are John Moore, are you?

Sep. 3, 2020 at 4:52 p.m.

#44

mhockey91

Joined: Jun. 2015

Posts: 15,921

Likes: 6,980

Quoting: Silkysmooth42

I think krug resigns tbh

Sep. 3, 2020 at 5:19 p.m.

#45