SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TBL 20-21 trading Serg

Created by: JTBF81
Team: 2020-21 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 11, 2020
Published: Sep. 11, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,000,000
3$2,500,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$1,150,000
2$2,750,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
Additional Details:
'20 Min 3rd
2.
TBL
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (EDM)
3.
TBL
    '20 ANA 5th
    ANA
    1. Coburn, Braydon
    Additional Details:
    Any team works here.
    4.
    TBL
    1. Brännström, Erik
    Additional Details:
    '20 NYI 1st
    OTT
    1. Sergachev, Mikhail [RFA Rights]
    5.
    TBL
      '20 FLA 2nd
      FLA
      1. Johnson, Tyler
      Additional Details:
      Johnson may consider for FLA due to staying in Florida. In any case, a 2nd or 3rd will be where the return should be.
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2021
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the EDM
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the NSH
      Logo of the NJD
      2022
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      2023
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      Logo of the TBL
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$81,500,000$80,329,999$0$450,000$1,170,001
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $5,300,000$5,300,000
      LW, RW
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $6,750,000$6,750,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $9,500,000$9,500,000
      RW
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Nashville Predators
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RW, C, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $4,000,000$4,000,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $8,500,000$8,500,000
      LW, C
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $925,000$925,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $5,166,666$5,166,666
      C, LW, RW
      NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $1,800,000$1,800,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $750,000$750,000
      LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $750,000$750,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $7,875,000$7,875,000
      LD
      NMC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $9,500,000$9,500,000
      G
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $6,750,000$6,750,000
      LD
      NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $1,300,000$1,300,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Ottawa Senators
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
      LD/RD, LW
      RFA - 2
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $700,000$700,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
      $1,150,000$1,150,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 2

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:08 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 10,301
      Likes: 7,146
      I'd probably do the Preds deal
      JTBF81 liked this.
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:08 p.m.
      #2
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 2,587
      Likes: 573
      This version places the higher priority on Cirelli and Cernak, rather than Sergachev. This agm also allows Tampa to keep Shattenkirk while still having both Foote and Brannstrom as options moving forward. I don't really believe that Tampa will shop Sergachev, but this is a way they could trade him and still have a solid defense going ahead. Not sure why the site isn't allowing '20 draft picks to be inserted in trades, so that's the reason for the way the trades look.
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:09 p.m.
      #3
      HutsonNorlinderGuhle
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 2,768
      Likes: 1,377
      When we realized that Brännström wasn’t a franchise player, we still knew that he was a blue-chipper, really good D prospect that is worth almost Mark Stone. Sens are overpaying
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:13 p.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2018
      Posts: 17,162
      Likes: 12,185
      Ottawa doesn't consider that deal.
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
      #5
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 2,587
      Likes: 573
      Quoting: HabsFan9
      When we realized that Brännström wasn’t a franchise player, we still knew that he was a blue-chipper, really good D prospect that is worth almost Mark Stone. Sens are overpaying


      Disagree but thanks. Ottawa hopes Brannstrom will show the same progression as Sergachev. Tampa is getting the player with potential, while Ottawa is getting the already proven NHL dman. A very late 1st(28th most likely) does not make this some steal for Tampa.
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:33 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 9,527
      Likes: 8,968
      Yeah Ottawa isn’t gonna do this. Sergachev isn’t worth more than Mark Stone lol
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 6:40 p.m.
      #7
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 2,587
      Likes: 573
      Quoting: Alfie11
      Yeah Ottawa isn’t gonna do this. Sergachev isn’t worth more than Mark Stone lol


      Great, but that means nothing for Tampa. An Ottawa fan proposed this as the base of a trade, and in the very unlikely event that Tampa was convinced to move Serg then a trade like this would have a chance. Tampa isn't going to be trading him for less than a 1st plus very good prospect/elc type, and this 1st is very late. Again, if Ottawa wouldn't do it no problem, 20+ other teams would be very interested if he were realistically available.
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 7:16 p.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2020
      Posts: 9,527
      Likes: 8,968
      Quoting: JTBF81
      Great, but that means nothing for Tampa. An Ottawa fan proposed this as the base of a trade, and in the very unlikely event that Tampa was convinced to move Serg then a trade like this would have a chance. Tampa isn't going to be trading him for less than a 1st plus very good prospect/elc type, and this 1st is very late. Again, if Ottawa wouldn't do it no problem, 20+ other teams would be very interested if he were realistically available.

      Yeah I understand that. You'd probably have better luck going for CAR 2020 1st+Lundkvist from NYR, it just doesn't make sense for Ottawa to trade for him right now when we're mid-rebuild (it wouldn't be terrible if this was 2 years down the line as an acceleration move though). We also can't give him top pair minutes on the left
      Sep. 11, 2020 at 8:22 p.m.
      #9
      LOCKEMUP
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2019
      Posts: 557
      Likes: 228
      sens pass. We dont need more LD which is what sergachev is. Brannstrom prefers the right side. Sergachev hasnt really taken those steps people expected him to take in 2 years since he stepped into the lineup. Hes a solid top 4 guy right now but not a ton more than that. Brannstrom is our best prospect and were in the middle of rebuilding. We wouldnt give him AND a first for sergachev. If we draft drysdale i could see this happening, but without the first
      Sep. 12, 2020 at 1:08 a.m.
      #10
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 2,587
      Likes: 573
      Quoting: yeeeeeeeeeetttt
      sens pass. We dont need more LD which is what sergachev is. Brannstrom prefers the right side. Sergachev hasnt really taken those steps people expected him to take in 2 years since he stepped into the lineup. Hes a solid top 4 guy right now but not a ton more than that. Brannstrom is our best prospect and were in the middle of rebuilding. We wouldnt give him AND a first for sergachev. If we draft drysdale i could see this happening, but without the first


      Serg has taken considerable steps this year and has only played 3 seasons. He is projected to be at least a high end top 4 with a top pairing ceiling. At the moment he's behind Hedman and McD on the left, but he can easily switch to the right if needed. Again, no problem if Ottawa doesn't want him, but Tampa would quickly pass at him for Brannstrom 1 for 1.
      Sep. 12, 2020 at 1:16 a.m.
      #11
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 2,587
      Likes: 573
      Quoting: Alfie11
      Yeah I understand that. You'd probably have better luck going for CAR 2020 1st+Lundkvist from NYR, it just doesn't make sense for Ottawa to trade for him right now when we're mid-rebuild (it wouldn't be terrible if this was 2 years down the line as an acceleration move though). We also can't give him top pair minutes on the left


      Understandable, that offer from the Rangers would also be considered by Tampa. Serg is very likely going to be a top pairing dman sooner rather than later and can play the right side just about as effectively as the left. He's also just 22 so he definitely hasn't reached his peak yet. Anyway, don't see Tampa likely moving him but this trade from an Ottawa fan seemed to have some support elsewhere, so I figured I'd see what people thought.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll