Lmao delete this.

That Anaheim trade.

I think it's good. Anaheim gets Marner and Toronto gets to watch the city burn to ashes,

If we take out Zegras and you guys remove the 1st is it still a deal? So Rakell/Manson/2nd for Marner and I'd want Holl to replace as a RHD??

Nah the term difference is too much

Ie both your guys are two years only

So the value is still fair but the lack of term between Rakell and Manson is the issue?

To me the value of both Rakell and Manson are limited by their short contracts (recognizing that a large part of their value (more Rakell than Manson) is their low AAV contracts).

In two years Anaheim would still have Marner, and the Leafs would have potentially nothing.

Its why I wouldn't pay the likely asking price for Parayko as he only has two years left.

Ok that's fair. Marner as a player is surely worth more talent wise than the package we'd be sending in this case. Marner's value is just greatly impacted by the monster of a contract he's on and the fact he's somewhat expendable positionally for you guys (you have a surplus of skilled wingers). Ultimately the added cap space is the real value you get out of this. It's ultimately marner vs manson/rakell/3 mill(ish) in cap space. I think we line up as trade partners because you guys need the depth and we need a star, this is all hypothetical of course because our GM won' take a swing that big and you guys will apparently never deal marner.