Must have 3 TERRIBLE contracts accounting for AT LEAST $16,500,000 of the cap.
(And no, you cant be like 'Marner's a bad contract sooo...', they have to be players that have little-to no impact on a team, or that you would have to pay to dump the contract.)
FIll in the rest of the roster using any players you wish. No ELCs, 22 man roster.
What's the point if you can just scratch them? This is a basically just a lower cap challenge...
I didn't make it. I just took part cos I thought it might be fun. You dont have to take part if you dont want to.
If you want to debate "what's the point" what's the point of making armchair gms in the first place? what's the point of the interactive component of capfriendly?
I didn't make it. I just took part cos I thought it might be fun. You dont have to take part if you dont want to.
If you want to debate "what's the point" what's the point of making armchair gms in the first place? what's the point of the interactive component of capfriendly?
i think he is referring to benching the contracts. Kind of defeats the purpose of this challenge.
i think he is referring to benching the contracts. Kind of defeats the purpose of this challenge.
I get that's what he was meaning. But its the internet, if you dont wanna take part go do something else. Some people wanted to have fun with something what's the point of commenting that you dont want to play the game?
I get that's what he was meaning. But its the internet, if you dont wanna take part go do something else. Some people wanted to have fun with something what's the point of commenting that you dont want to play the game?
Again, I think his point is, you're not really doing the challenge that you outlined and wanted to take part in, because you are eliminating two of the contracts from playing.
I didn't make it. I just took part cos I thought it might be fun. You dont have to take part if you dont want to.
If you want to debate "what's the point" what's the point of making armchair gms in the first place? what's the point of the interactive component of capfriendly?
I just don't see the difference between this and a lower cap challenge basically. You didn't make it so that's fine - but I think it would be more fun and challenging if the bad contract players had to be in the lineup. Just one guy's opinion.
Again, I think his point is, you're not really doing the challenge that you outlined and wanted to take part in, because you are eliminating two of the contracts from playing.
I followed the template set by the the guy that made the challenge in the first place. :-)