SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What I dont want the Habs to do

Created by: GenXHockey
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 19, 2021
Published: Jan. 19, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If I don’t like it, Habs fans should love it.
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$73,957,976$0$3,137,500$7,542,024
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$735,000$735,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$771,666$771,666 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:32 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 860
Likes: 264
reverce phycology i see
csick and GenXHockey liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:32 p.m.
#2
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,772
Likes: 24,491
I don’t know if I like it for Columbus
GenXHockey liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:36 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: csick
I don’t know if I like it for Columbus


Picks could be added to balance. I thought of adding a first but figured I would wait to see what others thought. They get a center they could re sign if they choose to, a young centre prospect and caufield who I think has good “perceived” value.

This is of course if they feel it’s necessary to move pld.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:37 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,614
Likes: 6,493
IMO this is about the only type of PLD trade that makes sense. Although I hate the idea of losing Caufield, this is a case where both teams win. Danault keeps the Jackets competitive now and he gets to remain a top 6 center. Caufield gives them a very good prospect to pick up some of the scoring slack at the end of this season or next year. Poehling gives them a possible 3C or 4C option and Byron can play up and down the lineup.
GenXHockey liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:37 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: habsfan01
reverce phycology i see


It’s an excellent way to remove my bias.
habsfan01 liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:39 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Campabee
IMO this is about the only type of PLD trade that makes sense. Although I hate the idea of losing Caufield, this is a case where both teams win. Danault keeps the Jackets competitive now and he gets to remain a top 6 center. Caufield gives them a very good prospect to pick up some of the scoring slack at the end of this season or next year. Poehling gives them a possible 3C or 4C option and Byron can play up and down the lineup.


That was pretty much my thought. I will be honest I’m not high on caufield, not at the nhl level anyway. I think his perceived value is very high and this is the type of move that would make sense to cash in on him. If I’m wrong about caufield... you still got pld lol.
habsfan01 liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:41 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 860
Likes: 264
Quoting: Jamiepo
That was pretty much my thought. I will be honest I’m not high on caufield, not at the nhl level anyway. I think his perceived value is very high and this is the type of move that would make sense to cash in on him. If I’m wrong about caufield... you still got pld lol.


naw prime caulfield one for one is good for a fringe 1C in dubois
GenXHockey liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:42 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,614
Likes: 6,493
Quoting: Jamiepo
That was pretty much my thought. I will be honest I’m not high on caufield, not at the nhl level anyway. I think his perceived value is very high and this is the type of move that would make sense to cash in on him. If I’m wrong about caufield... you still got pld lol.


I have been keeping pretty close tabs on Caufield though out his college career and the kids shot may have got him drafted but imagine Gallagher with a deadly shot and that is Caufield. He may not always be scoring but his effort level equals Gally's. Hence the reason I don't like losing him.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:42 p.m.
#9
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,772
Likes: 24,491
Quoting: Jamiepo
Picks could be added to balance. I thought of adding a first but figured I would wait to see what others thought. They get a center they could re sign if they choose to, a young centre prospect and caufield who I think has good “perceived” value.

This is of course if they feel it’s necessary to move pld.


I wouldn’t trade Dubois for anything less than a sure fire prospect or #1D/#1C. A guy like Romanov, Suzuki, Zegras, Glass, Rossi, Cozens would have to be in the deal.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:54 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 5,304
If I'm the BJ's, Danault has to come with an extension for me to even consider this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:58 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t trade Dubois for anything less than a sure fire prospect or #1D/#1C. A guy like Romanov, Suzuki, Zegras, Glass, Rossi, Cozens would have to be in the deal.


Suzuki isn’t a prospect
He’s already a high-end 2C right now
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:59 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
If I'm the BJ's, Danault has to come with an extension for me to even consider this.


No such thing as a sign and trade.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 4:59 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: GMs
Suzuki isn’t a prospect
He’s already a high-end 2C right now

Suzuki is better than pld in my opinion.
GMs liked this.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 5,304
Quoting: Jamiepo
No such thing as a sign and trade.


Oh, since when?
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t trade Dubois for anything less than a sure fire prospect or #1D/#1C. A guy like Romanov, Suzuki, Zegras, Glass, Rossi, Cozens would have to be in the deal.


Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t trade Dubois for anything less than a sure fire prospect or #1D/#1C. A guy like Romanov, Suzuki, Zegras, Glass, Rossi, Cozens would have to be in the deal.


I just don’t value pld that high.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:01 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Oh, since when?


When was the last one?
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:01 p.m.
#17
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,772
Likes: 24,491
Quoting: Jamiepo
I just don’t value pld that high.


He’s 22 and playing in a defensive system with non elite guys. Play him with Ehlers and Connor in Winnipeg and see if he gets less than 70 pts a year
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:08 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: csick
He’s 22 and playing in a defensive system with non elite guys. Play him with Ehlers and Connor in Winnipeg and see if he gets less than 70 pts a year


Calling it right now, Suzuki>pld... both ways. And I don’t mean in the future.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:10 p.m.
#19
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,772
Likes: 24,491
Quoting: Jamiepo
Calling it right now, Suzuki>pld... both ways. And I don’t mean in the future.


I don’t agree
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:12 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: csick
I don’t agree


I didn’t think you did judging by the trade options you listed. Completely just my opinion.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:12 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 5,304
Quoting: Jamiepo
When was the last one?


Off the top of my head, I have no idea. That doesn't mean they don't exist/can't happen.

Not exactly a sign and trade, but didn't Vegas and Mark Stone's camp talk before the trade to make sure he was willing to sign there and lay the groundwork for a deal? He signed shortly after being traded.
Jan. 19, 2021 at 5:14 p.m.
#22
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,772
Likes: 24,491
Quoting: Jamiepo
I didn’t think you did judging by the trade options you listed. Completely just my opinion.


He’s a low end 1C but he’s only 22. He could be the next Couturier but he won’t be a top 10 centre
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll