SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is this where we end up next season

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 12, 2021
Published: Mar. 12, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
2$2,250,000
2$1,500,000
2$3,000,000
2$950,000
4$4,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
Trades
CHI
WPG
  1. De Haan, Calvin
Additional Details:
Taken in expansion.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$51,841,009$452,439$4,532,500$29,658,991
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 12, 2021 at 2:27 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 4,825
Isn’t the expectation that toews could play next season? I guess for arguments sake you say yes or no. In this scenario, I think hawks shouldn’t make any crazy moves, if they can build their prospect pool a bit, they could turn this around fully fairly fast. I’d look into trading Kane (if toews is out). Kane could return a ridiculous return with a bit of retention. He’s still a top 10 player IMO. I mean look what he’s doing this year.

Hawks should “tank” in 2021-2022, having a chance at Shane wright with the new draft lottery rules would be great. They have a solid core, but they need to add some blue chip pieces to the fold if they want to make quick improvements. They’ll be back in the central which will be a literal shark tank. You have MIN, STL, WPG, DAL who are all really good. NSH could bounce back, ARI will join and they usually hang around wildcard or just out of the wildcard spot.
Mar. 12, 2021 at 2:39 p.m.
#2
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,649
Likes: 9,778
Quoting: tsyls
Isn’t the expectation that toews could play next season? I guess for arguments sake you say yes or no. In this scenario, I think hawks shouldn’t make any crazy moves, if they can build their prospect pool a bit, they could turn this around fully fairly fast. I’d look into trading Kane (if toews is out). Kane could return a ridiculous return with a bit of retention. He’s still a top 10 player IMO. I mean look what he’s doing this year.

Hawks should “tank” in 2021-2022, having a chance at Shane wright with the new draft lottery rules would be great. They have a solid core, but they need to add some blue chip pieces to the fold if they want to make quick improvements. They’ll be back in the central which will be a literal shark tank. You have MIN, STL, WPG, DAL who are all really good. NSH could bounce back, ARI will join and they usually hang around wildcard or just out of the wildcard spot.


I agree they need blue chips, BUT I'd also add that you can't do it with blue chips alone. The Hawks season to "tank" was supposed to be this year, but they're firmly in a playoff spot right now. The non blue chips are just playing really good hockey right now.
tsyls liked this.
Mar. 12, 2021 at 3:02 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 4,825
Quoting: exo2769
I agree they need blue chips, BUT I'd also add that you can't do it with blue chips alone. The Hawks season to "tank" was supposed to be this year, but they're firmly in a playoff spot right now. The non blue chips are just playing really good hockey right now.


I agree, but you can’t expect them to sustain this level of play. They’re playing very well yes, but that’ll be affected once they return to a normal division, while facing all the other teams. While yes this was the year to tank. It’s been such a weird year, so continue the plan into next year.
Mar. 12, 2021 at 4:35 p.m.
#4
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,649
Likes: 9,778
Quoting: tsyls
I agree, but you can’t expect them to sustain this level of play. They’re playing very well yes, but that’ll be affected once they return to a normal division, while facing all the other teams. While yes this was the year to tank. It’s been such a weird year, so continue the plan into next year.


Normal division? IDK I think the old Central is proving their salt. The North is the weakest division in my mind. only division where more than 50% of the teams make the playoffs. I'm also not sold on TOR despite them leading the division. I'd be more worried about WPG than TOR despite last night.
tsyls and ChiHawk liked this.
Mar. 12, 2021 at 5:10 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 4,825
Quoting: exo2769
Normal division? IDK I think the old Central is proving their salt. The North is the weakest division in my mind. only division where more than 50% of the teams make the playoffs. I'm also not sold on TOR despite them leading the division. I'd be more worried about WPG than TOR despite last night.


Trust me I agree, Toronto isn’t that scary. I was more so saying Chicago will struggle once they’re back in the central with the rest of the killers.
exo2769 and ChiHawk liked this.
Mar. 12, 2021 at 5:25 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Hagel won't get close to that number; more likely $1.25M as he is a role player and rookie. Kampf is closer to that number but still not above $2M IMO. Nylander isn't getting over $1M. Suter has no leverage, unlike Kubalik, so $2M to $2.5M is max. Just because we have cap space, doesn't mean we should overpay our RFAs.
Mar. 14, 2021 at 6:44 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 80
Likes: 13
Quoting: ChiHawk
Hagel won't get close to that number; more likely $1.25M as he is a role player and rookie. Kampf is closer to that number but still not above $2M IMO. Nylander isn't getting over $1M. Suter has no leverage, unlike Kubalik, so $2M to $2.5M is max. Just because we have cap space, doesn't mean we should overpay our RFAs.


I agree that Hagel will get less - probably $1.25m for 2 years. In general, I think Suter, Nylander, and Kampf all get a little less.

Overall, I think this is pretty close to what will happen. However, I don't think Janmark will be back with the Blackhawks. If he isn't traded by the deadline this year, I'd be shocked because he's probably the most likely to be dealt ahead of Soderberg. I don't think there will be a spot for him in the line up either - especially if Toews comes back and Strome isn't traded because that will push Strome or Suter to wing. I suspect Reichel will get 9 games to see at the start of the season and I could see him sticking in the NHL - he'll have already played 2 seasons with men in Germany.

I also don't think Janmark will be back because the Blackhawks will be carrying a bad contract or 2 or possibly 3 if Toews is done. Seabrook is done and Shaw is likely done too. If they don't make deals to take bad contracts at the deadline, they certainly will after the expansion draft as teams try to be cap compliant. I see them taking a big contract for a year or two like Loui Eriksson from the Canucks or Andrew Ladd from the Islanders in exchange for an elite prospect and/or 1st round draft picks. Zadarov's new deal will mostly be covered in the cap by what he's getting paid now plus the Saad retained salary which will be freed up. de Haan is likely taken by Seattle but, if he isn't, they'll certainly keep him to guide the new defensemen along until his contract expires or they'll deal him at the 2022 deadline if they're out of playoff position. If de Haan isn't back, his salary is the money the Blackhawks will use for the raises on the new deals for the other RFAs - Suter, Kampf, Hagel, Wallmark, and Nylander - who all get 2 year deals. This will give Bowman the same in-season flexibility to make deals to acquire new assets. I see the Blackhawks collecting prospects and picks for the next calendar year. I doubt they move anyone that isn't a pending UFA this season and next season.
Kyle_Davidson liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll