Way too many good players. If I'm "another team", I want them to take the player with the worst contract.

Many of these are the worst contracts, or not the best players.
That is the point of the post.

NSH isn't going to be happy if SEA takes Jarnkrok. He might actually get protected by the Preds. SEA taking Duchene would be the ideal scenario for them.

Rask isn't the most common player being sent from the Wild, Soucy is and there's usually some form of incentive included (which isn't too ridiculous depending on which players other teams expose).

I mean Detroit won't lose any sleep if they take Namestnikov, but they'd much prefer Seattle took Nielsen lol

If it would the worst player available+worst contract, it would be something like this: Deslauriers/Larsson, Hayden, Moore, Okposo, Lucic, Gardiner, Connolly/de Haan, Johnson if NMC waived otherwise Miska, Harrington, Kero, Nielsen, Neal, Stralman, Maatta, Rask, Byron/Chiarot/Edmundson, McCarron, Subban/Johnsson/Greer, Ladd, DeAngelo, Zaitsev, Gostisbehere, Riikola, Jones, Bortuzzo, Johnson, Malgin, Eriksson/Myers, Malenstyn, Dano.

Did it quickly so it's not perfect but it fits the most with "how other teams wanted them to". As you can see, it's really bad to the point it's unrealistic. Not sure the title is what you meant to say because "the most common players sent to Seattle in ACGM's over recent weeks" aren't necessarily the players the NHL teams would like to send. I know what you mean, I'm not sure how to phrase it though.

Jets will have DeMelo protected

I mean to say, "the most common players sent to Seattle in ACGM's over recent weeks" (Which is what I said)

Because these are the players most frequently shipped off to Seattle by each team.

I've seen more Lauzon then Kase for the Bruins.