SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bring on the Critics

Created by: Habhater
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2021
Published: Jun. 16, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Bruins remaining cap hit is $81,500,000 less $78,026,722 = $3,473,278. The overages and bonuses are not applicable to the 2022 season. This leaves plenty of cap room when Rask returns. You probably do not have to even buyout Moore for this to work out.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,350,000
2$1,025,000
2$1,805,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$6,500,000
2$5,250,000
3$4,500,000
3$3,500,000
2$5,000,000
3$4,000,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Kase, Ondrej [RFA Rights]
  3. Khokhlachev, Alexander [Reserve List]
  4. Vaakanainen, Urho
  5. 2021 7th round pick (TOR)
2.
BOS
SEA
  1. Lauzon, Jérémy
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$75,306,507$1,956,507$125,000$6,193,493
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,025,000$1,025,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,350,000$4,350,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:02 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,423
Likes: 10,729
Flames will want a top pairing LD man back for Hanifin... that us better than him to trade him
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:03 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 838
As an Oilers fan, I like the idea of Calgary giving you Hanifin for that package. In reality, there's a good chance Giordano is left exposed to go to Seattle and Calgary would need to keep Hanifin with Tanev for their top pair.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:06 p.m.
#3
DaBus
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 489
Brutal trade for CGY. Debrusk is inconsistent, Vaak hasn't proven much yet, Kase is made of glass and Khokhachev is average at best
villenash liked this.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:06 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
I don't' understand Seattle. Why are they getting two guys and pick?
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:15 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 8,066
Likes: 4,255
Quoting: Propeller09
I don't' understand Seattle. Why are they getting two guys and pick?



Paying them to take either Ritchie, or Lauzon. They don’t have to pay though, so who knows.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:27 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Paying them to take either Ritchie, or Lauzon. They don’t have to pay though, so who knows.


Instead of who? Both or neither of those guys could be protected. One of them will be selected. I am not sure the Bruins have a preference.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 8,066
Likes: 4,255
Quoting: Propeller09
Instead of who? Both or neither of those guys could be protected. One of them will be selected. I am not sure the Bruins have a preference.


Maybe Hanifin trade is before the draft so they can go 4-4-1 and pay them so they don’t take Smith. That’s my guess.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:38 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Flames pass, that is a bad package. I like DeBrusk but he's noot close on his own and nothing else in that package is appealing, other than Kase who we could just sign as a UFA when he doesn't get a qualifying offer.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 1:41 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 507
Are u planning to pull a tampa and bring Rask in for Game 1 of the yoffs
Jun. 16, 2021 at 2:07 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Maybe Hanifin trade is before the draft so they can go 4-4-1 and pay them so they don’t take Smith. That’s my guess.


That's dumb - Not you. Wait a week and don't give away free assets. It's not like Lauzon or Ritchie are bad or overpaid. I would actually be irate if they did that. The whole reason the didn't go after or end up with Eckholm was because they didn't want to lose too many assets.
Nhl_oilers liked this.
Jun. 16, 2021 at 2:29 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 4,566
2 of the players your trading to CGY are going to be UFA's (koko also just resigned in the KHL)

Why are we giving up a pick to lose two players?

There is just so much that doesn't make sense with this ACGM
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll