SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wild over the cap next year

Created by: NHLfan10506
Team: 2022-23 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 19, 2021
Published: Jul. 19, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
(I used evolving hockey salary projections)
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
1$925,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,676,000
5$6,606,000
2$2,638,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$4,500,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$1,901,000
2$3,021,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$90,191,421$0$1,615,000-$8,691,421
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,676,000$9,676,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,606,000$6,606,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,638,000$2,638,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,901,000$1,901,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,021,000$3,021,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000
D
UFA
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$828,333$828,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 19, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,682
Likes: 1,926
So I know Evolving Hockey projections are usually pretty close...but I’m feeling sticker shock over that Kahk contract. Is that not high?
Wildwinswhen liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,216
Likes: 23,100
Let's imagine the cap goes to 84.5m, then they are over 4.7m. Trade Dumba and Soucy with no cap returned. now Wild have 4m in cap space.....Two 2m Dman completes the roster.
But it looks like the Wild of 22/23 won't be as good as the 21/22 version
Jul. 19, 2021 at 10:03 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,194
Likes: 18,729
Quoting: palhal
Let's imagine the cap goes to 84.5m, then they are over 4.7m. Trade Dumba and Soucy with no cap returned. now Wild have 4m in cap space.....Two 2m Dman completes the roster.
But it looks like the Wild of 22/23 won't be as good as the 21/22 version


Simpler path may be to get Kaprizov to sign bridge deal....$6m x 2 years
Trade Dumba, promote Addison or Mennell.
jnowariak liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 10:14 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
No chance Kahokanen gets that deal. If Kirill signs that deal, I’m all in. But it doesn’t change that we can pick 2 of Fiala/Dumba/Kirill, it’ll be a tough choice but I think you need to make that decision this off-season to maximize value.

Two other notes, if you are going to pay Greenway 2.6 to play on the 4th line then you need to trade him. A 4th line wing should never make more than a mil. Same with a 3rd pairing D. Cole at 3 mil is not worth it unless he plays up in the lineup.

Interesting idea here though.
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 10:22 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 459
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Simpler path may be to get Kaprizov to sign bridge deal....$6m x 2 years
Trade Dumba, promote Addison or Mennell.


Quoting: jnowariak
No chance Kahokanen gets that deal. If Kirill signs that deal, I’m all in. But it doesn’t change that we can pick 2 of Fiala/Dumba/Kirill, it’ll be a tough choice but I think you need to make that decision this off-season to maximize value.

Two other notes, if you are going to pay Greenway 2.6 to play on the 4th line then you need to trade him. A 4th line wing should never make more than a mil. Same with a 3rd pairing D. Cole at 3 mil is not worth it unless he plays up in the lineup.

Interesting idea here though.


Even simpler path... Seattle takes Kahkonen. There's 3.5M off your cap when you call up Hunter Jones.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 10:40 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Even simpler path... Seattle takes Kahkonen. There's 3.5M off your cap when you call up Hunter Jones.


Kahk only makes 750k this year and next. And Jones is a massive question mark.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 10:40 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,194
Likes: 18,729
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Even simpler path... Seattle takes Kahkonen. There's 3.5M off your cap when you call up Hunter Jones.


Of course....
Totally forgot Seattle pick.

- 3.5 Kahk
- 3.0 Kap bridge deal
- 2.6 Greenway traded

gets pretty close
jnowariak and Wildwinswhen liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 10:52 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,194
Likes: 18,729
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Of course....
Totally forgot Seattle pick.

- 3.5 Kahk
- 3.0 Kap bridge deal
- 2.6 Greenway traded

gets pretty close


Or

- 5.0 Dumba swapped for ELC
- 1.7 Soucy traded for ELC
- 3.0 Kaprizov bridge deal

(if Seattle doesn't selection Kahkonen)
Jul. 19, 2021 at 11:15 a.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 975
Likes: 225
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Or

- 5.0 Dumba swapped for ELC
- 1.7 Soucy traded for ELC
- 3.0 Kaprizov bridge deal

(if Seattle doesn't selection Kahkonen)


Wild aren't bringing Kaprizov

Yeah, wild should trade their young top 4 d's for elc for no reason at all . Makes no sense
Jul. 19, 2021 at 12:12 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,194
Likes: 18,729
Quoting: Clement
Wild aren't bringing Kaprizov

Yeah, wild should trade their young top 4 d's for elc for no reason at all . Makes no sense


It makes sense because the Wild have a ton of dead money in coming years and will not be able to afford everyone

2021-22: $4.7m
2022-23: $12.7m
2023-24: $14.7m
2024-25: $14.7m
Jul. 19, 2021 at 12:56 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 975
Likes: 225
Quoting: NHLfan10506
It makes sense because the Wild have a ton of dead money in coming years and will not be able to afford everyone

2021-22: $4.7m
2022-23: $12.7m
2023-24: $14.7m
2024-25: $14.7m


No it really doesn't. You are just looking for ways to make wild worse
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:15 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 459
Quoting: NHLfan10506
It makes sense because the Wild have a ton of dead money in coming years and will not be able to afford everyone

2021-22: $4.7m
2022-23: $12.7m
2023-24: $14.7m
2024-25: $14.7m


Quoting: Clement
No it really doesn't. You are just looking for ways to make wild worse


I don't think we're going to be able to afford Greenway s next contract. So we should probably trade him at some point.

Trading Dumba will likely happen before his next contract too. There's no way we'll pay him another 6M, let alone 8M if he finds his 30g/year stride.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:18 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 975
Likes: 225
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
I don't think we're going to be able to afford Greenway s next contract. So we should probably trade him at some point.

Trading Dumba will likely happen before his next contract too. There's no way we'll pay him another 6M, let alone 8M if he finds his 30g/year stride.


I mean new Jersey fan is one of those who like to troll wild proposals. he has made numerous Kevin fiala trades with horrible proposals and has been called out for it numerous times. Here is saying wild should get rid of two top 4 dman in soucy. Other wild fans have called him out
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:21 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 459
Quoting: Clement
I mean new Jersey fan is one of those who like to troll wild proposals. he has made numerous Kevin fiala trades with horrible proposals and has been called out for it numerous times. Here is saying wild should get rid of two top 4 dman in soucy. Other wild fans have called him out


Ok sure, maybe. But you know I'm not. I do honestly think Greenway and Dumba get traded for futures either this year or next. Also, if GMBG wants to add salary for a long term center, he'll need to trade Fiala. We can't afford everyone.
Clement liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:21 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 3,535
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
I don't think we're going to be able to afford Greenway s next contract. So we should probably trade him at some point.

Trading Dumba will likely happen before his next contract too. There's no way we'll pay him another 6M, let alone 8M if he finds his 30g/year stride.


Not that I'd have a problem with moving on from Greenway, but I don't think his next contract is going to be worth that much. His assist numbers were way overinflated this season because of Ek and Foligno, but he can't score goals, he doesn't have nearly the defensive game Ek does, and he can't play center. Luckily we have another season to gauge his value, but he's not getting anything close to 5M long term like Ek did. I would put his numbers at 4M max for no more than 4-5 years. I'd even say it comes in closer to 3.5M.
Clement and Wildwinswhen liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:22 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 975
Likes: 225
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Ok sure, maybe. But you know I'm not. I do honestly think Greenway and Dumba get traded for futures either this year or next. Also, if GMBG wants to add salary for a long term center, he'll need to trade Fiala. We can't afford everyone.


Agreed
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:42 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 459
Quoting: jnowariak
Kahk only makes 750k this year and next. And Jones is a massive question mark.


Yeah, Hunter is a compete unknown. I was just thinking if Kahk gets taken by the Kraken what would we do. Calling up Jones is one option or signing a backup for 1-2M would be alot cheaper than paying Kahn 4.5M in 2022.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:46 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 3,535
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Yeah, Hunter is a compete unknown. I was just thinking if Kahk gets taken by the Kraken what would we do. Calling up Jones is one option or signing a backup for 1-2M would be alot cheaper than paying Kahn 4.5M in 2022.


We'd have to sign a guy. Jones is NOT ready for the NHL. But Kahkonen is also not getting 4.5M if Seattle doesn't take him. That's a ridiculous contract for him, even if he has a great year this year.
Wildwinswhen liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:47 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
Yeah, Hunter is a compete unknown. I was just thinking if Kahk gets taken by the Kraken what would we do. Calling up Jones is one option or signing a backup for 1-2M would be alot cheaper than paying Kahn 4.5M in 2022.


Easy answer is we sign a vet back up for 1 mil, or a guy that wants to rehab his image behind our d corps. I don’t think losing Kahk changes the future of MIN goaltending because I don’t think they projected him to be “the guy”.

That said, I think they are very seriously looking into Cossa and will draft a goalie with one of their top 5 picks this year at the very least. Perhaps we get a young goalie via trade of Jones develops. It’s very much up in the air.
Wildwinswhen liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 1:48 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,194
Likes: 18,729
I have made two Fiala trades ever.
Both I thought were very fair.

1) Couturier to MIN along with Zacha, Boqvist while giving up Fiala and Dumba (before expansion lists were made and before Suter was bought out)

2) Kuokkanen, Merkley, 1st, 3rd for Fiala.

There are two Wild fans that have been following me around from thread to thread, saying things like Kuokkanen has zero value, Miles Wood would not make the Wild roster and other BS. It is all a bit tiresome.

My experiences up until now with Wild fans has been great. But these two are poor representatives of the smart, good-natured Wild fan-base.
jnowariak and Wildwinswhen liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 2:15 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 459
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I have made two Fiala trades ever.
Both I thought were very fair.

1) Couturier to MIN along with Zacha, Boqvist while giving up Fiala and Dumba (before expansion lists were made and before Suter was bought out)

2) Kuokkanen, Merkley, 1st, 3rd for Fiala.

There are two Wild fans that have been following me around from thread to thread, saying things like Kuokkanen has zero value, Miles Wood would not make the Wild roster and other BS. It is all a bit tiresome.

My experiences up until now with Wild fans has been great. But these two are poor representatives of the smart, good-natured Wild fan-base.


I'm sorry to hear that. It's so easy to mark people as "ignore" on this site I'd prefer if we did that rather than follow people around.

That being said.... Trade #1 is clearly fair to me. Especially at the time you proposed it. Trade #2 is hard to evaluate because I've never seen the players, but Kuokkanen seems like he had a decent year and I think trading for futures is always hard to balance.
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 2:38 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I have made two Fiala trades ever.
Both I thought were very fair.

1) Couturier to MIN along with Zacha, Boqvist while giving up Fiala and Dumba (before expansion lists were made and before Suter was bought out)

2) Kuokkanen, Merkley, 1st, 3rd for Fiala.

There are two Wild fans that have been following me around from thread to thread, saying things like Kuokkanen has zero value, Miles Wood would not make the Wild roster and other BS. It is all a bit tiresome.

My experiences up until now with Wild fans has been great. But these two are poor representatives of the smart, good-natured Wild fan-base.


Yeah man, I think your values for Fiala are pretty decent. I like the fit there and the fact that if they move him he’ll be in the East. Anybody saying Kuokannen isn’t valuable doesn’t really have a grasp on prospects, I’d ask Boqvist but that’s me.

As for the Wood thing, the Wild have a lot of middle to bottom 6 guys. It’s not that Wood is bad, he’d just be redundant on the Wild.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 2:40 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 3,535
Quoting: Wildwinswhen
I'm sorry to hear that. It's so easy to mark people as "ignore" on this site I'd prefer if we did that rather than follow people around.

That being said.... Trade #1 is clearly fair to me. Especially at the time you proposed it. Trade #2 is hard to evaluate because I've never seen the players, but Kuokkanen seems like he had a decent year and I think trading for futures is always hard to balance.


No one is following him around. He posts a thread about the Wild, Wild fans show up. That's how this works.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 2:43 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 3,535
Quoting: jnowariak
Yeah man, I think your values for Fiala are pretty decent. I like the fit there and the fact that if they move him he’ll be in the East. Anybody saying Kuokannen isn’t valuable doesn’t really have a grasp on prospects, I’d ask Boqvist but that’s me.

As for the Wood thing, the Wild have a lot of middle to bottom 6 guys. It’s not that Wood is bad, he’d just be redundant on the Wild.


Oh don't say that, come on now. You're looking at two 23 year old bottom/middle six wingers as if they're something to target in a Fiala trade. It's not a good look.
Jul. 19, 2021 at 2:48 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Caerii
Oh don't say that, come on now. You're looking at two 23 year old bottom/middle six wingers as if they're something to target in a Fiala trade. It's not a good look.


I never said it’s a target, it’s about getting value. Priority number one is keeping Fiala, but if you can’t then you need to get the most value you can for him.

As for Kuokannen, he’s shown consistent production through his development and posted a half point per game first season in the NHL playing on a relatively bad team. He’s not my pick of guys to get from NJD but you could certainly do worse.
Wildwinswhen liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll