And why would we trade our third rounder for Engvall. Canucks reject, player not useful

Arz. Passes and offers Dvorak for Matthews

Van just traded for Dickinson, pretty much rules out Engvall.

Leafs accept!!! SUCKERS!!!

When you say "something like this" do you mean "nothing like this"?

Garland 4 years 2 million???? Not even close. Also trading for 3 very useful players will cost more than 5 useless expandable pieces. Arizona laughs and hangs up.

So you’re getting 3 good to very good players and giving up some table scraps and a couple of picks? And then you turn around and recoup picks for one of those pieces? And Garland signs that miserable offer? Not to mention Engvall is worth a 7th at best.

Any of this seem realistic to you?

Ah nice, member since today. Have trouble with the “I am not a robot” part?

Dvorak would actually play #1LW and Garland would actually play #2LW, so you're getting two top-6 players with term plus your starting goalie for a year or a first-round draft pick. In return, Arizona gets a bottom-pairing defenseman (even on that team), a goalie prospect who has never played a game in the NHL and a forward prospect who has never played a professional hockey game in North America, plus two distant futures. Does that seem at all equitable? Does it seem at all likely that a professional GM would make that trade for the other side?

Amirov and the second MIGHT get you Kuemper. That entire package doesn't get you either Dvorak or Garland by themselves.

Hey!! C'mon now @vikhodush, you've been around here long enough to see a true Leafs fan when it slaps you in the face! Garland signs that deal because he feels so privileged to be out of AZ and on the LEAFS!!! And we all know that when a Leaf fan says 2nd and a 3rd rounder, they always mean 1st and 2nd, and when they say Dermott, they mean Reilly....

I should know better…