You did it for me. In the Article there is a post from JFresh that states that McGinn is a bottom 6 forward. That's all we need to know. He's not a 2nd liner.
You did it for me. In the Article there is a post from JFresh that states that McGinn is a bottom 6 forward. That's all we need to know. He's not a 2nd liner.
That has nothing to do with what I said. I said his defensive analytics are good, you said they weren't. Now back up why you think they are not good.
That has nothing to do with what I said. I said his defensive analytics are good, you said they weren't. Now back up why you think they are not good.
His defensive analytics are good for a bottom 6 forward sure, but I commented that in the original post that stated he was a 2nd line forward. Those decent defensive numbers don't make him a 2nd line player.
His defensive analytics are good for a bottom 6 forward sure, but I commented that in the original post that stated he was a 2nd line forward. Those decent defensive numbers don't make him a 2nd line player.
lmao no no. 1st, I said his defensive analytics are very good, and you responded with "It's really not". So again, prove that hes not really good on defense. 2nd, the comment was "hes much closer to a 2nd liner than a 4th liner, great 3rd liner" So where exactly was it stated he was a 2nd line forward? lmao wow you really are struggling immensely
His defensive analytics are good for a bottom 6 forward sure, but I commented that in the original post that stated he was a 2nd line forward. Those decent defensive numbers don't make him a 2nd line player.
Yeah thats what I thought. Go watch another sport, hockey isn't for you
lmao no no. 1st, I said his defensive analytics are very good, and you responded with "It's really not". So again, prove that hes not really good on defense. 2nd, the comment was "hes much closer to a 2nd liner than a 4th liner, great 3rd liner" So where exactly was it stated he was a 2nd line forward? lmao wow you really are struggling immensely
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
His defensive analytics are good for a bottom 6 forward sure, but I commented that in the original post that stated he was a 2nd line forward. Those decent defensive numbers don't make him a 2nd line player.
As someone indifferent to the Penguins (I don't hate them or like them):
Over the last two season, Brock McGinn has 2 defensive WAR above average, which ranks him 104th among forwards who have played at least 50 minutes, tied with Cam Atkinson, Max Pacioretty, and Mason Appleton. He is opulently skilled on the penalty kill, where he will likely replace Brandon Tanev. Overall, his impact is one an average bottom line forward (his defensive numbers are let down by his poor offensive numbers). Projections have him become a replacement-level player by next season in 2022-23.
As someone indifferent to the Penguins (I don't hate them or like them):
Over the last two season, Brock McGinn has 2 defensive WAR above average, which ranks him 104th among forwards who have played at least 50 minutes, tied with Cam Atkinson, Max Pacioretty, and Mason Appleton. He is opulently skilled on the penalty kill, where he will likely replace Brandon Tanev. Overall, his impact is one an average bottom line forward (his defensive numbers are let down by his poor offensive numbers). Projections have him become a replacement-level player by next season in 2022-23.
I'm actually a fan of the Penguins, I just don't like the move.
This is awful. He's not even that great of a 3rd liner. Would be a good 4th liner, but the AAV is high
I think honestly they brought him in to replace Tanev. I have a feeling ZAR and Rodrigues will play with Carter while Heinen and McGinn will play with Bleuger
KSIxSKULLS liked this.
Reply
CapFriendly
CapFriendly