SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

USA Team Built On Speed and Grind Similar to 2010 and not 2014

Created by: slapshot30003
Team: 2021-22 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 9, 2021
Published: Sep. 9, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team is not meant to be popular, but one that will grind out wins. I'm sorry, but Debrincat, Guentzel, Gaudreau and Oshie will not win you a gold medal. They will help you go 4-0 or 3-1 in the prelims, but they will not win you anything in the elimination rounds. Canada, Sweeden, Russia will eat them alive.
Base the team the same way you build playoff teams; Speed, Size, Strength, and role players.
You have scoring in Kane, Matthews, Connor, and the most offensive back end of any team. You do not need more scoring in the bottom 6.
The list is pretty organized here. The Scratches are the two extra players you can have. The IR players are my cuts that could go either way to round out the bottom 6. The taxi squad are guys who are on the radar but don't make the team.
The team will get you to a gold medal game in my opinion. Your bottom two centers have better FOW than your top two. Even the bottom two lines have wingers who have a better FOW than the top two centers. But each of the bottom 2 lines have the ability to put pucks in the net, while being considered "shut down" lines or "identity lines" for the team.
Compare this team to Vancouver that won Silver. Burkie built a team that will grind you down. In 2014, Poile built a team that relied on scoring more vs grind you down style. That team didn't medal at all. If you'd like to have Debrincat, Gaudreau and the rest of those guys, then that's fine, but I doubt that team will medal.
So to finalize, my team is built similar to the 2010 team, but the defense is a little more offensive than that team. I believe this group will get you in the final game.
Oh and I love the 3rd line. You should be able to put that line out against the best from any team and they will not only shut them down, but also push the pace and be that "identity line" that each team needs.
Oh did I mention, I'd love to see the first powerplay unit?!? That sure would be fun to watch! This team should have a bit of nastiness to it!
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$100,000,000$199,393,524$0$2,700,000-$99,393,524

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$7,142,857$7,142,857
LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,166,667$6,166,667
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Hughes, Quinn
$10,000,000$10,000,000
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$8,000,000$8,000,000 ($6,875,000$7M$6,875,000$7M)
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000 ($4,875,000$5M$4,875,000$5M)
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000 ($3,375,000$3M$3,375,000$3M)
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,750,000$3,750,000 ($2,625,000$3M$2,625,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,650,000$3,650,000 ($2,525,000$3M$2,525,000$3M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000 ($5,875,000$6M$5,875,000$6M)
LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$5,750,000$5,750,000 ($4,625,000$5M$4,625,000$5M)
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000 ($3,875,000$4M$3,875,000$4M)
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,850,000$5,850,000 ($4,725,000$5M$4,725,000$5M)
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000 ($5,625,000$6M$5,625,000$6M)
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Does this Team get you to the final game?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:30 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 188
Likes: 98
Suter should be in there over Hughes. too many offensive dmen in the lineup. Suter is still a really strong shutdown dman
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:42 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Jupetto
Suter should be in there over Hughes. too many offensive dmen in the lineup. Suter is still a really strong shutdown dman


Like 20 guys over Hughes.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:43 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 6,683
Likes: 814
Mike Sullivan is the coach, there will be no grind. Connor Sheary will be first line LW
slapshot30003 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:46 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 188
Likes: 98
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Like 20 guys over Hughes.


At this point I would agree that he isn't even making the team - just not enough experience in high importance games and defensively isn't quite good enough yet.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:47 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Jupetto
At this point I would agree that he isn't even making the team - just not enough experience in high importance games and defensively isn't quite good enough yet.


He’s just not good enough at hockey.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:49 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 188
Likes: 98
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
He’s just not good enough at hockey.


Well thats just not true.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:12 a.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Jupetto
Well thats just not true.


Sure it is. He stinks at 5 on 5, and is awesome on the PP. but fox is better on the PP, so there’s no reason to have him.
slapshot30003 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:18 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,937
Likes: 7,434
I agree,the usa should bring and play worse players over better ones
BigDaddyOvech liked this.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:27 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: Jupetto
Suter should be in there over Hughes. too many offensive dmen in the lineup. Suter is still a really strong shutdown dman


Fair point
Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:30 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I agree,the usa should bring and play worse players over better ones


I'm a Hawks fan and I'd take Wheeler over Debrincat , Guentzal, Gaudreau, and Oshie ANY DAY. Hell I'd take Kreider, Nelson, Lee, Pacoriretty over those guys......

Defense wins you championships. Not small players who can get thrown around. Luckily Kane has enough talent that won't be an issue.
Jupetto liked this.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:32 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Like 20 guys over Hughes.


I like the points on Suter over Hughes. That leaves me on a torn decision though.... McDonagh vs Suter. Tough call because McDonagh sure looked solid in playoffs and Suter hasn't looked like he used to. Players in their prime, I'd take Suter all day.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 10:41 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I agree,the usa should bring and play worse players over better ones


Look at the history of USA teams. The two years they brought teams that are tough grinders (1997 WC and 2010 OG) they either won gold or silver. All other years you have smaller more (talented) players, they hardly medaled. It's too bad Stan would rather have a team based on talent and not a team meant to win in the games that are battles.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 11:21 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: slapshot30003
I like the points on Suter over Hughes. That leaves me on a torn decision though.... McDonagh vs Suter. Tough call because McDonagh sure looked solid in playoffs and Suter hasn't looked like he used to. Players in their prime, I'd take Suter all day.


Domoulin, Martinez, suter, McDonagh, krug, schmidt, hanifin before I even bring up Hughes name.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 11:44 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,937
Likes: 7,434
Quoting: slapshot30003
Look at the history of USA teams. The two years they brought teams that are tough grinders (1997 WC and 2010 OG) they either won gold or silver. All other years you have smaller more (talented) players, they hardly medaled. It's too bad Stan would rather have a team based on talent and not a team meant to win in the games that are battles.


Or they just lost other times because it's a short tournament where randomness can take over.
You bring the best team you can and hope foe the best, every other country hopes like hell the usa thinks gritty hockey over skill is the direction taken by that team
Sep. 9, 2021 at 12:28 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Edited Sep. 9, 2021 at 1:59 p.m.
Apparently, you don’t watch playoffs. How’s Toronto or Colorado doing?
Oh yeah, two of the most talented teams were ousted early in the playoffs.
Tampa bay is talented, but they also have a good amount of grit in their game.
Dallas didn’t get to the finals with just talent, Montreal didn’t, Nashville didn’t.
The common theme here.
You need top-end talent though to win.
Kane and Matthew’s are your top-end talent.
Canada has a lot more as well, but going with the guys I keep referencing will get you a winning record in preliminarys and knocked out quickly after that.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 2:03 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Or they just lost other times because it's a short tournament where randomness can take over.
You bring the best team you can and hope foe the best, every other country hopes like hell the usa thinks gritty hockey over skill is the direction taken by that team


If you look at the long list of Stanley Cup Champions, each one had a combination of Grit/Role Players and Talented Players. If you add Oshie, Gaudraeu, Debrincat then you will have an lopsided mix of talent.
On top of this, if you want to play the style of game that has the "most talented players" then you better compare them to who you are playing against. Canada would destroy the US on talent alone. Russia would beat the US on Talent. Sweeden and Finland would probably do the same in my opinion. Does anyone not remember 1980?
Sep. 9, 2021 at 2:49 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,937
Likes: 7,434
Quoting: slapshot30003
If you look at the long list of Stanley Cup Champions, each one had a combination of Grit/Role Players and Talented Players. If you add Oshie, Gaudraeu, Debrincat then you will have an lopsided mix of talent.
On top of this, if you want to play the style of game that has the "most talented players" then you better compare them to who you are playing against. Canada would destroy the US on talent alone. Russia would beat the US on Talent. Sweeden and Finland would probably do the same in my opinion. Does anyone not remember 1980?


One, the Olympics are not the cup. It's a one game tournament format where goal differential means something.
Two, discounting oshie as a skill guy when he's one of the most big stage clutch players the states has ever had is hilarious
Three, just because some teams have slogged their way to wins doesnt mean that is how you build a winner. Canada isnt going to care if the usa wants to grind it out, they will just cycle the worse players into dust faster than a speedier more skilled team that lacks counter punch.
The usa will have by far the strongest goaltending in the tournament and they should use that to lean the other way.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 7:19 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 188
Likes: 98
Quoting: slapshot30003
I'm a Hawks fan and I'd take Wheeler over Debrincat , Guentzal, Gaudreau, and Oshie ANY DAY. Hell I'd take Kreider, Nelson, Lee, Pacoriretty over those guys......

Defense wins you championships. Not small players who can get thrown around. Luckily Kane has enough talent that won't be an issue.


Defense is what got them to OT of the gold medal game against canada in 2010. Rafalski was a beast in that olympics. Hellebuyck has the ability to match or better Ryan Millers performance from that year. I think speed and grit is the way to go as well. I think you're lineup is pretty ideal. But many will disagree and thats the way it goes. I still say Suter over Hughes as Suter can munch huge minutes and his defensive game is so strong especially against Canada and Russian offenses.
slapshot30003 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 8:54 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
One, the Olympics are not the cup. It's a one game tournament format where goal differential means something.
Two, discounting oshie as a skill guy when he's one of the most big stage clutch players the states has ever had is hilarious
Three, just because some teams have slogged their way to wins doesnt mean that is how you build a winner. Canada isnt going to care if the usa wants to grind it out, they will just cycle the worse players into dust faster than a speedier more skilled team that lacks counter punch.
The usa will have by far the strongest goaltending in the tournament and they should use that to lean the other way.


I can see you’re now a troll. Who cares about point differential in olympics? It might help you not play Canada in the first round of preliminaries.
Oshie was clutch one time on the national stage, but was still on a team who didn’t Medal ( I think). Maybe bronze.
But point is, you might be in it to have a good record, but I’m focused on winning the gold medal.
Jupetto liked this.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:14 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 188
Likes: 98
Quoting: slapshot30003
I can see you’re now a troll. Who cares about point differential in olympics? It might help you not play Canada in the first round of preliminaries.
Oshie was clutch one time on the national stage, but was still on a team who didn’t Medal ( I think). Maybe bronze.
But point is, you might be in it to have a good record, but I’m focused on winning the gold medal.


Outside of the shootout Oshie only had one goal in 2014, hardly the definition of clutch. If the olympics were just non stop shootouts then he would be there.
Sep. 9, 2021 at 9:15 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,937
Likes: 7,434
Quoting: slapshot30003
I can see you’re now a troll. Who cares about point differential in olympics? It might help you not play Canada in the first round of preliminaries.
Oshie was clutch one time on the national stage, but was still on a team who didn’t Medal ( I think). Maybe bronze.
But point is, you might be in it to have a good record, but I’m focused on winning the gold medal.


ah yes, the "nuh uh, youre a troll because you disagree with me" reply. Always a good sign you have nothing. And goal differential, not point differential, you see when teams are otherwise tied, teams that score more goals get the tie breaker, it's pretty common knowledge for anyone who knows anything about international hockey.
Im also not saying you should have oshie on the team, just that not putting him there because he's a "skill" guy is a dumb reason.
And if you dont make the gold medal game then you cant win the gold medal game, if you are bringing grinders over more skilled players you're reducing your chances of making that gold medal game
Sep. 10, 2021 at 8:40 a.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Hawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
ah yes, the "nuh uh, youre a troll because you disagree with me" reply. Always a good sign you have nothing. And goal differential, not point differential, you see when teams are otherwise tied, teams that score more goals get the tie breaker, it's pretty common knowledge for anyone who knows anything about international hockey.
Im also not saying you should have oshie on the team, just that not putting him there because he's a "skill" guy is a dumb reason.
And if you dont make the gold medal game then you cant win the gold medal game, if you are bringing grinders over more skilled players you're reducing your chances of making that gold medal game


Are you telling me that USA might not get into the quarter-finals with this team while playing Canada, Germany and China? Wow I didn't realize how back USA Hockey was that they can't beat China and Germany?!?!?
Once you get to quarter-finals, it's a grind bud.... The USA has shown time and time again that talent won't get you gold medals.
2006- No medal - team had little talent and grind
2010 - Won Silver - Good combo of talent and physical play
2014 - No medal - talented team lacking grit/size/speed
2018 - No medal - No identity for this team and hard watched.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit