SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2019 Draft Class

Created by: Pleau2
Team: 2021-22 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2021
Published: Sep. 17, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$20,469,165$0$21,545,000$61,030,835
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$62,500$62K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$825,833$825,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$863,333$863,333
LD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,550,000$2M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 17, 2021 at 1:59 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1,946
Seider > Söderström
Byram > Björnfot
Boldy > Krebs, Newhook
Kaliyev > Robertson, Foote, Pinto
Pleau2 liked this.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 2:41 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,833
Likes: 18,589
Such a loaded draft class.

Other late guys to consider:

Dustin Wolf
Adam Beckman
Alex Campbell
Alexei Protas
Samuel Bolduc
Drew Helleson
Zach Jones
Elmer Soderblum
Tyler Angle
Sep. 17, 2021 at 2:52 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,521
Likes: 9,148
Quoting: TZ11
Seider > Söderström
Byram > Björnfot
Boldy > Krebs, Newhook
Kaliyev > Robertson, Foote, Pinto


Yes
Yes
Definitely not Boldy isn’t a C Newhook out produced him at BC and Krebs is criminally underrated
Maybe - Kaliyev is a straight scorer who vaguely pretends to play defense.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 3:30 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 3,161
Move either Cozens or Dach to center where they belong and Boldy to wing. Boldy is a winger, not a center.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 3:59 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 3,161
Edited Sep. 17, 2021 at 4:18 p.m.
Quoting: Xqb15a
Yes
Yes
Definitely not Boldy isn’t a C Newhook out produced him at BC and Krebs is criminally underrated
Maybe - Kaliyev is a straight scorer who vaguely pretends to play defense.


Newhook is better than Krebs, by a fair margin and Boldy is just as good as Newhook. One can debate which is better, but it's close. They're two very different players. But that is why they meshed so well at BC.

Not only were Boldy and Newhook at BC together. They're also best friends, and were roommates as well as linemates. They were inseparable, both on the ice as well as off of it. Newhook started off on Boldy's wing while BC was experimenting with Boldy at center for the the first half of Boldy's freshman year, and even if it didn't work out and the two were ultimately swapped in the positions they played moving forward, Newhook had the benefit of playing that wing position for so long. Even after the switch and Boldy took off offensively after being moved back to his natural wing position, he still played the more defensive role and would often defer production by continuing to utilize Newhook as the primary point producer on that line. That's just how those two worked together and rolled as teammates/friends/players.

So yes, naturally, Newhook out produced Boldy at BC, but that was because of Boldy not because he’s the lesser player.
Xqb15a liked this.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 5:19 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1,946
Edited Sep. 17, 2021 at 6:47 p.m.
Quoting: Xqb15a
Yes
Yes
Definitely not Boldy isn’t a C Newhook out produced him at BC and Krebs is criminally underrated
Maybe - Kaliyev is a straight scorer who vaguely pretends to play defense.


Yeah, idk why I thought Boldy was a C. I even have him listed as a Winger in my prospect profile of him tears of joy. I can definitely see both being better but Boldy is one of those prospects I just really like (and possibly overrate). But since he's not a C (I know that mistake is gonna annoy me for a while) I'd just put him on the Wing. He is better than Foote imo.
I shouldn't have included Pinto. But I definitely prefer Kaliyev > Foote and probably Robertson as well (he gets overhyped a bit imo, mainly because he's a Leaf).
Xqb15a liked this.
Sep. 17, 2021 at 6:39 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,521
Likes: 9,148
Quoting: RazWild
Newhook is better than Krebs, by a fair margin and Boldy is just as good as Newhook. One can debate which is better, but it's close. They're two very different players. But that is why they meshed so well at BC.

Not only were Boldy and Newhook at BC together. They're also best friends, and were roommates as well as linemates. They were inseparable, both on the ice as well as off of it. Newhook started off on Boldy's wing while BC was experimenting with Boldy at center for the the first half of Boldy's freshman year, and even if it didn't work out and the two were ultimately swapped in the positions they played moving forward, Newhook had the benefit of playing that wing position for so long. Even after the switch and Boldy took off offensively after being moved back to his natural wing position, he still played the more defensive role and would often defer production by continuing to utilize Newhook as the primary point producer on that line. That's just how those two worked together and rolled as teammates/friends/players.

So yes, naturally, Newhook out produced Boldy at BC, but that was because of Boldy not because he’s the lesser player.


Yeah I didn’t get into that but that line really took off when they switched positions. I think you’re underrating Krebs, Krebs is just a 200ft stud. Outside of international competition he was saddled with a pathetic junior team and on the international teams it was so easy for the team to put him in a defensive role it diminished what his offensive side is.

But great detail add on the Boldy Newhook relationship.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll