SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just make these the lines

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 14, 2021
Published: Oct. 14, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I’ve seen enough of TJ in that first game to know he’s only a number 1C in the preseason. While I don’t have anything specifically against Carpenter and Khaira, I don’t see what they bring to the team that Gaudette and Strome can’t do better. Speaking of better, that’s what Seth Jones needs to be, and I don’t want the hear it from the guy anymore, I want to see it. IMO playing 27 minutes or whatever he did last night is fine, but since very few of them were good minutes I’m hard pressed to figure out a reason why he played for so long. My takeaways are that he is a good skater, but doesn't have much of a shot, and has only a basic ability to run a PP or drive an offense. He looks like he may pick up a bunch of secondary assists, but that’s probably it. In conclusion Boqvist is better.
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$66,029,214$452,439$3,415,000$15,470,786
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$997,500$997,500
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 14, 2021 at 10:16 a.m.
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 5,824

MatthewsFan liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 10:39 a.m.
#2
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,649
Likes: 9,778
Quoting: Stan_Bowman



Not a coincidence that the ice time leader is at the bottom...and ice time laggered is at the top. That's what happens when the team is overall bad. Flawed stat for a single game because Kaner was terrible too. That doesn't mean Seth Jones was good. He was terrible for the 1st 10 minutes of the game. Not an excuse. He needs to be better. Those bottom 5 guys ALL need to be better.
villenash liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 10:49 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Big mistake to not have Strome in the game. However, I wouldn't put both Strome and Borgstrom on the same line as they both aren't good at defense. So far, I think Borgstrom is another Strome with less offense which isn't a good think. I would sit Borgstrom and play Gaudette up on the RW. I thought Carps had a decent game.
JackBurton liked this.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 10:59 a.m.
#4
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 408
Quoting: exo2769
Not a coincidence that the ice time leader is at the bottom...and ice time laggered is at the top. That's what happens when the team is overall bad. Flawed stat for a single game because Kaner was terrible too. That doesn't mean Seth Jones was good. He was terrible for the 1st 10 minutes of the game. Not an excuse. He needs to be better. Those bottom 5 guys ALL need to be better.


Hate to say it, but this is all pointless discourse until they sack that dip**** in the suit and, at the bare minimum, hire a competent coach.

Gallant was right there the whole time...
Oct. 14, 2021 at 11:03 a.m.
#5
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,649
Likes: 9,778
Quoting: JackBurton
Hate to say it, but this is all pointless discourse until they sack that dip**** in the suit and, at the bare minimum, hire a competent coach.

Gallant was right there the whole time...


I'm not saying you're wrong. I just tend toward giving coaches more time than most. Too many times system changes occur in the middle of a season and that's the exact reason things fall apart. If we're going down...go down with the plan in place vs being wishy washy.
Oct. 14, 2021 at 11:05 a.m.
#6
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 10,412
Likes: 11,982
Quoting: Stan_Bowman



Seth Jones Neutral Zone Defense rating the past 5 years:

2016-17: 92nd percentile (as in better than 92% of all skaters)
2017-18: 93rd percentile
2018-19: 82nd percentile
2019-20: 7th percentile
2020-21: 2nd percentile

9.5 till 2029 😢
Oct. 14, 2021 at 12:30 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 851
Quoting: Stan_Bowman



So essentially, this chart kinda proves two things.

1) the Blackhawks, as an organization, completely suck at the analytics side of hockey, and
2) why the hell does JC still have a job? He clearly can’t get the best out of this team so why do they pretend he’s capable of doing so?
Oct. 14, 2021 at 12:38 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 5,824
Quoting: HatterTParty
So essentially, this chart kinda proves two things.

1) the Blackhawks, as an organization, completely suck at the analytics side of hockey, and
2) why the hell does JC still have a job? He clearly can’t get the best out of this team so why do they pretend he’s capable of doing so?

Wouldn’t go so far as to say “prove” but yeah this team suck in just about every aspect that matters.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll