SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Gambling Approach

Created by: Mr_Gardoki
Team: 2022-23 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 17, 2022
Published: Jan. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
There's a little of risk-taking going on, but if it works it would make life on the Pens easier. Gambling on some youth as well.

Seattle has a lot of depth down the left side and likely still slow-rolling their push to be a playoff team. This gives them a a decent middle-six younger forward and a decent prospect to add to their depth. POJ can still be sent down once signed or flipped for futures.

The CHI trade is probably the one I expect to get pushback on, but with one year left for Zucker, a change of scenery may do him good and Pens get some solid depth.

BUF - This is a gamble. Okposo is still proving to be an effective player, but I honestly have zero clue what his value is in trade.

NYI - This is probably the least realistic out of these trades since it's within the division, but Varly gives the Pens what they need in a back-up capable of being a starting goalie for stints if Jarry gets injured. NYI get their LHD and one who probably fits like a glove in Trotz' system. I assume Isle fans will push back on the prospect, but hey, give me a counter-offer.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,750,000
2$750,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$8,000,000
4$7,100,000
3$850,000
5$6,000,000
4$3,750,000
Trades
1.
2.
3.
PIT
  1. Okposo, Kyle ($3,000,000 retained)
BUF
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (PIT)
4.
PIT
  1. Varlamov, Semyon ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Wilde, Bode
  3. 2023 4th round pick (NYI)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$80,259,167$0$82,500$2,240,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 17, 2022 at 1:57 p.m.
#1
Pens are the best
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 5,390
Likes: 1,691
Ill gladly take Okposo for that
Mr_Gardoki and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:01 p.m.
#2
Briere Masterclass
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 480
Isles probably reject. Varlamov hasn’t been the best but he still is alright so I’d remove the 4th rounder and maybe add on like a fifth to the isles side
Mr_Gardoki liked this.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:02 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: B_seka17
Isles probably reject. Varlamov hasn’t been the best but he still is alright so I’d remove the 4th rounder and maybe add on like a fifth to the isles side


Sorry, slightly confused. You're saying take the 4th out and have the Pens add a 5th?
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
#4
Briere Masterclass
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 480
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Sorry, slightly confused. You're saying take the 4th out and have the Pens add a 5th?


I’m saying remove the fourth from the pens side and add a fifth to the isles side. I did word that a little weird sorry
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:07 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: B_seka17
I’m saying remove the fourth from the pens side and add a fifth to the isles side. I did word that a little weird sorry


LOL I still don't know what you mean by adding it to the Isles side. I'm not trying to be dense. You mean the Pens get a 5th instead of a 4th or the pens send a 5th instead of receiving a 4th?
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#6
Briere Masterclass
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 480
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
LOL I still don't know what you mean by adding it to the Isles side. I'm not trying to be dense. You mean the Pens get a 5th instead of a 4th or the pens send a 5th instead of receiving a 4th?


I’m saying the Pens get Varlamov and Wilde and the Isles get Petterson and a fifth
Mr_Gardoki liked this.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: B_seka17
I’m saying the Pens get Varlamov and Wilde and the Isles get Petterson and a fifth


Ok gotcha. I appreciate the feedback, but I have to respectfully disagree. If the Isles are sellers at the 22/23 deadline, depending on how Valry performed that year they probably can get at best a 2nd, but probably a 3rd (due to salary). I'd say right now Pettersson is worth a 3rd + solid prospect, maybe a 2nd depending on the team trading for him, so that's why I downgraded to a 4th + solid prospect, but I don't think the Pens need to add. If push came to shove, I'd just remove the pick.
B_seka17 liked this.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:21 p.m.
#8
Briere Masterclass
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 480
I misread that. I though it was this deadline. I totally agree considering he’s probably going to regress further and be a pending UFA
Mr_Gardoki liked this.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:27 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: B_seka17
I misread that. I though it was this deadline. I totally agree considering he’s probably going to regress further and be a pending UFA


Yeah, this is part of my gambling approach to all of this. I have no idea how Varly will age in another year, but he seems still capable of being at least average which is better than what the Pens currently have.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:47 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,205
Likes: 9,568
Chicago easily declines. We have no use to take on a $5.5M cap hit for one year for a 30 year player. Especially considered Stillman is locked in for 3 years at $1.35M as a 23 year old RFA who is exceeding everyone's expectations and should be a 2nd line mainstay, maybe even first liner, next season replacing Calvin De Haan.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:51 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: ChiHawk
Chicago easily declines. We have no use to take on a $5.5M cap hit for one year for a 30 year player. Especially considered Stillman is locked in for 3 years at $1.35M as a 23 year old RFA who is exceeding everyone's expectations and should be a 2nd line mainstay, maybe even first liner, next season replacing Calvin De Haan.


As I said in the explanation, I expected this one to be the biggest pushback.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:53 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,205
Likes: 9,568
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
As I said in the explanation, I expected this one to be the biggest pushback.


But you didn't explain why Chicago would want Zucker just the benefit to the pens or Zucker as a player so I added the Chicago point of view for clarity
Jan. 17, 2022 at 2:58 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: ChiHawk
But you didn't explain why Chicago would want Zucker just the benefit to the pens or Zucker as a player so I added the Chicago point of view for clarity


I actually did. I said a change of scenery may be good for him. Zucker, if you do a bit of a deep dive into his advanced stats, has been playing excellent hockey this year. He's just snake-bit in the scoring department. A change of scenery or possibly playing with guys who might fit his style better may open up his scoring.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 3:27 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,205
Likes: 9,568
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I actually did. I said a change of scenery may be good for him. Zucker, if you do a bit of a deep dive into his advanced stats, has been playing excellent hockey this year. He's just snake-bit in the scoring department. A change of scenery or possibly playing with guys who might fit his style better may open up his scoring.


But why would Chicago want a 30 year old LW (which they have plenty of) for 1 year for a team that isn't competing over a 23 year old very impressive RFA on a 3 year deal? That's what you missed out on.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 3:35 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: ChiHawk
But why would Chicago want a 30 year old LW (which they have plenty of) for 1 year for a team that isn't competing over a 23 year old very impressive RFA on a 3 year deal? That's what you missed out on.


You're having trouble scoring goals and taking a gamble on a player who has a proven history of scoring and may benefit from a change of scenery isn't the most uncommon thing to do.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 5:45 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
You're having trouble scoring goals and taking a gamble on a player who has a proven history of scoring and may benefit from a change of scenery isn't the most uncommon thing to do.


As a bottom 10 team, gaining a guy for scoring for 1 year whilst giving up a promising young D man on a favourable cap hit and term is not really in our best interests. Whilst I agree, Zucker would benefit from a change of scenery, I don't think we are that team. You will probably keep him until seasons end and make a deal similar to a Saad deal (Zadorov).
ChiHawk liked this.
Jan. 17, 2022 at 6:13 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,205
Likes: 9,568
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
You're having trouble scoring goals and taking a gamble on a player who has a proven history of scoring and may benefit from a change of scenery isn't the most uncommon thing to do.


It is when you're working on building youth into the team and not close to competing. Youth = a 23 year old 3 year signed RFA that is a 2nd liner and potentially will develop into a 1st liner. A 30 year old with one year remaining who is having trouble scoring goals isn't going to help this team long term thus, why would the Hawks consider this? Makes zero sense
Jan. 17, 2022 at 10:32 p.m.
#18
Hit them with a toey
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 186
Likes: 85
Sabres don't do that deal. Retention is too high for too little in return. At the beginning of the year, I think this deal would have worked, but with Okposo playing a lot better this year, the price has gone up I'm sure.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jan. 25, 2022 at 1:31 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
This is not a fraction of the risk but a real gamble as the choice is not quite obvious to this observation from the outside.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll