SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

MAF Chasing Cup

Created by: Aussie_Blackhawk
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 27, 2022
Published: Jan. 27, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This scenario also puts us in a position to take cap dumps for picks at TDL.
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Lapierre, Hendrix
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (WPG)
  3. 2022 4th round pick (WSH)
WSH
2.
CHI
  1. 2022 4th round pick (NSH)
3.
CHI
  1. Holmberg, Pontus
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. De Haan, Calvin ($2,275,000 retained)
  2. 2022 4th round pick (WSH)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$59,881,714$452,439$3,415,000$21,618,286
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 27, 2022 at 7:42 p.m.
#1
CUP OR BUST
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 750
Likes: 365
i want to see him traded to the pens because him in a caps jeresy just doesnt look right.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 7:47 p.m.
#2
Tintin over 1122
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 15,929
Likes: 10,166
Quoting: yeboi6
i want to see him traded to the pens because him in a caps jeresy just doesnt look right.


He doesn’t want to wear one
SociallyHawkward liked this.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 7:55 p.m.
#3
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,297
Likes: 4,476
MAF already has 3 cups
capsfan2121 liked this.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 8:05 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,711
Likes: 7,378
the leafs arnt giving a 2nd for a guy who would be rotating in and out off their bottom pairing let alone throwing in a prospect
Jan. 27, 2022 at 9:13 p.m.
#5
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
the leafs arnt giving a 2nd for a guy who would be rotating in and out off their bottom pairing let alone throwing in a prospect


It's called depth. & I bet they will give up a 2nd for that type of guy.

Once Muzzin inevitably gets injured in the playoffs again, you don't want Sandin as your 2nd pairing in playoffs with the types of mistakes he made last season.

I don't think it'll be De Haan they go after, but you can bet they're loading up and getting someone for the back end. Use your head and think logically next time.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 9:17 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,711
Likes: 7,378
Quoting: TrueCanuck
It's called depth. & I bet they will give up a 2nd for that type of guy.

Once Muzzin inevitably gets injured in the playoffs again, you don't want Sandin as your 2nd pairing in playoffs with the types of mistakes he made last season.

I don't think it'll be De Haan they go after, but you can bet they're loading up and getting someone for the back end. Use your head and think logically next time.


no, bottom pairing depth costs a 3rd max. Better guys like Mike Rielly got 3rds last year. Ben Hutton was depth, he cost a 5th. DeHann like depth doesnt cost double what Rielly gets.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 9:19 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: IconicHawk
MAF already has 3 cups


Doesn't make the hunger for another any less, particularly if your a driven professional.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 10:00 p.m.
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
no, bottom pairing depth costs a 3rd max. Better guys like Mike Rielly got 3rds last year. Ben Hutton was depth, he cost a 5th. DeHann like depth doesnt cost double what Rielly gets.


De Haan can easily step in to play top 4 mins. If you want good players, you have to give up something good.
Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
Jan. 27, 2022 at 10:05 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,711
Likes: 7,378
Quoting: TrueCanuck
De Haan can easily step in to play top 4 mins. If you want good players, you have to give up something good.


except that Rielly is better, and cost less. If you want depth, you pay depth prices.
Jan. 28, 2022 at 9:39 a.m.
#10
Roster Architect
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 909
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
except that Rielly is better, and cost less. If you want depth, you pay depth prices.


Just like before, you literally always just say that whatever player in whatever post on here is "bad" primarily because they don't play for the Leafs. Get a new line kind. It gets old pretty fast and you have no logic.
Jan. 28, 2022 at 9:44 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,711
Likes: 7,378
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Just like before, you literally always just say that whatever player in whatever post on here is "bad" primarily because they don't play for the Leafs. Get a new line kind. It gets old pretty fast and you have no logic.


i love how you try and pull this when i am literally talking about players who have never played for the leafs being better. Dehaan isnt very good because he isnt very good. and you are pulling the same old dismissive crap you always do because someone doesnt agree with you because you have nothing left to put into the actual hockey argument.
This is very very simple. DeHaan isnt worth the price because 1-he isnt worth near that much and 2-we have literal examples of better players than him getting traded for significantly less at the time of year where prices are the highest.
the part about saying i have no logic when you cant even comprehend that 2nd point is hilarious and must be a pretty brutal blow to your self esteem, no wonder you are projecting.
Jan. 28, 2022 at 9:57 a.m.
#12
Go Jets Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 5,440
Likes: 4,186
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Just like before, you literally always just say that whatever player in whatever post on here is "bad" primarily because they don't play for the Leafs. Get a new line kind. It gets old pretty fast and you have no logic.


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
i love how you try and pull this when i am literally talking about players who have never played for the leafs being better. Dehaan isnt very good because he isnt very good. and you are pulling the same old dismissive crap you always do because someone doesnt agree with you because you have nothing left to put into the actual hockey argument.
This is very very simple. DeHaan isnt worth the price because 1-he isnt worth near that much and 2-we have literal examples of better players than him getting traded for significantly less at the time of year where prices are the highest.
the part about saying i have no logic when you cant even comprehend that 2nd point is hilarious and must be a pretty brutal blow to your self esteem, no wonder you are projecting.


Why don't you two simply add each other to your ignore lists? Every other post there is an argument and reports are made. Save yourself the trouble!
Jan. 28, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,711
Likes: 7,378
Quoting: Rooney
Why don't you two simply add each other to your ignore lists? Every other post there is an argument and reports are made. Save yourself the trouble!


I mean, i was just talking hockey, he wanted to make it personal for some weird reason.
Jan. 28, 2022 at 10:14 a.m.
#14
Go Jets Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 5,440
Likes: 4,186
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I mean, i was just talking hockey, he wanted to make it personal for some weird reason.


I'm not saying either side is right, all I'm saying is that it might be beneficial for you both wink
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll