You're not getting Lambos and two additional firsts for a rental. That's a pipe dream.

Jets decline.
Konecny we could use…. Jones, no

So many bad proposal on here today. Minnesota very easy declines. We don't need you to retain. Our gm isn't interested in trading a 1st for rentals. Claude isn't A C, much less Eichel

Rentals don't get three 1st round picks...

Lol, right. Gonna be one disappointed Gritty at trade deadline of that's the expectation.
Flyers should expect a late 1st and a lesser prospect like Hunt or O'rourke.

That i disagree with. But this deal here is for basically 3 1st round picks i know there is a cap dump but Wild don't need one

I meant to only put one 1st round not two my bad but Giroux is a top target at deadline and if Wild can they will compete for him to try and make sure the avalanche or blues don't get him since they are rivals in playoffs and he makes their top 6 rock solid. Giroux is worth a 1st and a top prospect at the minimum. Flyers could prolly get more out of them

Well it won't be wild. That has been made clear our gm isn't parting with a 1st or top prospect in aby cade for a rental. So you are truly wrong about that. Wild also don't see claude as a C

Interesting take. I don't recall any rental getting a return like that.

Nick Foligno got a 1st and a 4th last year, and i hope we can agree that Giroux is a better player.

Sure. Giroux is miles better. But I don't believe any GM would be short-sighted enough to trade so many assets for a player that plays 20-something games. At least not until some poor soul pays three 1sts for Klingberg or something.

I just read your 1st post. I'm sorry i totally misread it. You are absolutely right " Rentals don't get three first rounders."