SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Detroit Deadline

Created by: Mystaes
Team: 2021-22 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 15, 2022
Published: Mar. 15, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Could also acquire Petersson or Reilly in offseason for ~3rd round pick and trade Namestnikov for a pick somewhere instead
Trades
1.
DET
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
Additional Details:
Pens offload one of their three LHD at ~4m to make room for other acquisitions and contracts and improve their middle six.
PIT
  1. Namestnikov, Vladislav ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. 2022 4th round pick (VGK)
2.
DET
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
Could also be offseason - Calgary dumps Monahan for other acquisitions or the big contracts in the offseason
CGY
3.
DET
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. Leddy, Nick ($2,750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Based on Manson getting two seconds worth, and Leddy being virtually the same as Manson based on Hockeyviz offensive and defensive impacts, Leddy retained should net a second.
4.
DET
  1. 2022 5th round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Returning depth vet
5.
DET
  1. 2023 4th round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
Anywhere really. standard depth d move.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the COL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the DET
2023
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2024
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$70,704,898$0$4,518,750$10,795,102
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,625,000$2,625,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,375,000$2,375,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,460,000$1,460,000
LW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$318,750$319K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$737,500$737,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,600,000$3,600,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,950,000$2,950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$825,000$825,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 15, 2022 at 10:23 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,679
Likes: 12,059
I think Martinez would be a better add than Pettersson
Mar. 15, 2022 at 10:25 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 438
Likes: 305
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I think Martinez would be a better add than Pettersson


Martinez currently has nerve problems due to the laceration of his face that have held him out all season and would be an ongoing concern for any team acquiring him.

If he’s healthy sure.
GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 10:26 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,679
Likes: 12,059
Quoting: Mystaes
Martinez currently has nerve problems due to the laceration of his face that have held him out all season and would be an ongoing concern for any team acquiring him.

If he’s healthy sure.


Wasn’t aware of all of that. Changes my view
Mar. 15, 2022 at 10:52 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 700
Likes: 565
I was thinking about Monahan the other day. I would be in favour of this, we really need a 2C, and I think it's pretty obvious that Monahan needs a fresh start and has fallen down the Flames depth chart despite them having a very good season.

I'm not sure he could be had for free though, I think Calgary would still like something in return, but as a Detroit fan, I would take your proposal all day.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:06 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 62
Likes: 15
CGY doesn't give Mony away for free. There'd be other suitors that woudl easily pay at least a 2nd Rd Pick for him.
But... he does have a NTC and I imagine DET could be on that non-trade list of 10 teams.
Datsyukian and Wingsfan09 liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:10 a.m.
#6
StevieY19!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 690
Ya as disappointing Monahan has been I don't think he's a cap dump yet I think we'd have to pay a bit for him.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:14 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 438
Likes: 305
Quoting: JamCam
CGY doesn't give Mony away for free. There'd be other suitors that woudl easily pay at least a 2nd Rd Pick for him.
But... he does have a NTC and I imagine DET could be on that non-trade list of 10 teams.


They can be stuck with him then. I don’t think any gm is going to shell out assets for a guy who is overpayed by about 4m dollars (going off of the athletic hockey card market value here). Cap, especially in this environment, is a premium.

Mangiapane, Tkatchuk, And Gaudreau are all staring at new contracts and Calgary is going to want to shed cap space to make it happen. I suppose a different victim could be Lucic.
AnyoneButTheBruins liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:14 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 438
Likes: 305
Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
Ya as disappointing Monahan has been I don't think he's a cap dump yet I think we'd have to pay a bit for him.


Yeah his contract is about 4M more then his production value so if he’s not a dump I’m passing.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 11:41 a.m.
#9
StevieY19!!
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 690
Quoting: Mystaes
They can be stuck with him then. I don’t think any gm is going to shell out assets for a guy who is overpayed by about 4m dollars (going off of the athletic hockey card market value here). Cap, especially in this environment, is a premium.

Mangiapane, Tkatchuk, And Gaudreau are all staring at new contracts and Calgary is going to want to shed cap space to make it happen. I suppose a different victim could be Lucic.


Monahan would be easier to move as he is more productive. Yes he costs more but still. Lucic also has a full NMC and a M-NTC whereas Monahan is only a M-NTC.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.
#10
Datsyukian
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 445
Likes: 194
lol are you implying that Monahan is a cap dump? Are you also suggesting that Monahan is worth around $2M AAV?

Are you serious?
Mar. 15, 2022 at 12:06 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,113
Likes: 7,779
I don't see Edmonton trading for Gagner. Some fans would love it but there's just no reason to bring Sammy back.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#12
Wingsfan09
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 439
Likes: 152
I'd be very willing to shell out a 3rd for Monahan, and possibly a 2nd if that's what it takes. Is he overpaid? Yes, but he has also been very good not that long ago. Even if Monahan returns to a 40 pt player, he is still statistically better that what we would likely get from a 2nd/3rd. And if he returns to form, its a huge bonus. If not, its only 1 more year on his deal. We can afford it.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 12:16 p.m.
#13
Friedman for Norris
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 876
Likes: 190
Pens accept
Mar. 15, 2022 at 12:20 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 438
Likes: 305
Quoting: Datsyukian
lol are you implying that Monahan is a cap dump? Are you also suggesting that Monahan is worth around $2M AAV?

Are you serious?


His market value is about 2.5m AAV based on Dom’s model from the athletic. You normally don’t pay 6.4m to a guy with ~0.33ppg and not much else going for them.

Cap dumps aren’t always 0 production. The value of the contract compared to the value of the on ice product matter. Mark Staal was dumped with a 5.25M contract to the Wing’s for a second and he was still serviceable, just nowhere near 5m in value.
Billy12Bob liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 12:22 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 438
Likes: 305
Quoting: wingss
I'd be very willing to shell out a 3rd for Monahan, and possibly a 2nd if that's what it takes. Is he overpaid? Yes, but he has also been very good not that long ago. Even if Monahan returns to a 40 pt player, he is still statistically better that what we would likely get from a 2nd/3rd. And if he returns to form, its a huge bonus. If not, its only 1 more year on his deal. We can afford it.


If he’s not a dump we shouldn’t be spending assets to acquire 1 year of a UFA and help out a team in cap trouble. Cap is a premium asset and the picks could be used to get something with term. No need for a forward version of Leddy.
Billy12Bob liked this.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 2:32 p.m.
#16
Datsyukian
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 445
Likes: 194
Quoting: Mystaes
His market value is about 2.5m AAV based on Dom’s model from the athletic. You normally don’t pay 6.4m to a guy with ~0.33ppg and not much else going for them.

Cap dumps aren’t always 0 production. The value of the contract compared to the value of the on ice product matter. Mark Staal was dumped with a 5.25M contract to the Wing’s for a second and he was still serviceable, just nowhere near 5m in value.


You're comparing 35+ year old Marc Staal to 27 year old Sean Monahan....lol case closed.
Mar. 15, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 438
Likes: 305
Quoting: Datsyukian
You're comparing 35+ year old Marc Staal to 27 year old Sean Monahan....lol case closed.


What matters isn’t the age it’s production. Both had 1 year left at large overvaluation. Monahan being 27 has nothing to do with it because he’s a ufa after next year - it’s not like he’s an asset with control.

Both were/are not remotely worth their contracts. Dumps also don’t have to be 30+. They just have to be underperforming to enough of an extent that offloading them for something shinier is preferable.

I also didn’t come up with the Monahan trade, it was reviewed as a relatively fair trade by the athletic on a recent “ who says no” article for Detroit. I think you overvalue Monahan for what he was and not what his post injury self is.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 9:08 a.m.
#18
Datsyukian
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 445
Likes: 194
Quoting: Mystaes
What matters isn’t the age it’s production. Both had 1 year left at large overvaluation. Monahan being 27 has nothing to do with it because he’s a ufa after next year - it’s not like he’s an asset with control.

Both were/are not remotely worth their contracts. Dumps also don’t have to be 30+. They just have to be underperforming to enough of an extent that offloading them for something shinier is preferable.

I also didn’t come up with the Monahan trade, it was reviewed as a relatively fair trade by the athletic on a recent “ who says no” article for Detroit. I think you overvalue Monahan for what he was and not what his post injury self is.


He's a UFA in 2 years and can easily be extended - the notion that the Flames will just give him up for a pick as a dump is preposterous. The guy is a 6 OA pick with history of success in the league...he's had one down year after an injury.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll