SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs TDL Is this Chi deal fair

Created by: Rob88
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 18, 2022
Published: Mar. 18, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Giordano, Mark ($3,375,000 retained)
SEA
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
2.
CHI
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$74,344,783$0$0$7,155,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$0$0
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:07 p.m.
#1
Leafs suck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,565
Likes: 894
No
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:08 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 23
Quoting: mauston_atthews
No


How would you adjust?
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:08 p.m.
#3
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?
mauston_atthews liked this.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:09 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 838
The Chicago one probably isn't terribly far off, probably need to add another piece.

The Seattle one though, you're missing at least another 1st round pick.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:10 p.m.
#5
Leafs suck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,565
Likes: 894
Quoting: Nqutilus
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?


Quoting: Rob88
How would you adjust?


What he said
Nqutilus liked this.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:11 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 23
Quoting: Nqutilus
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?


What about including Engvall instead of another 2nd?
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:13 p.m.
#7
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Rob88
What about including Engvall instead of another 2nd?


Value-wise I could see it, it's not far off, but Chicago is rebuilding. We're going to want picks and prospects before anything else.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:15 p.m.
#8
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Nqutilus
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?


That's just what silly fans think. Mrazek has been a decent goalie for a number of years but isn't finding success in TO. So that now means he's worthless and was never good and will never be good. GM's aren't that dumb. To move him now would cost something for sure but I wager there are teams that would welcome him and his cap hit so moving him may be easier than people think. For crying out loud, the Leafs got rid of the much worse contract in Ritchie for a 3rd and got Lyubushkin out of it. So obviously it's not going to be as hard as people on here want it to be.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:15 p.m.
#9
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Rob88
What about including Engvall instead of another 2nd?


Why do you guys want to jettison Engvall? He's been very good all year.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#10
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
That's just what silly fans think. Mrazek has been a decent goalie for a number of years but isn't finding success in TO. So that now means he's worthless and was never good and will never be good. GM's aren't that dumb. To move him now would cost something for sure but I wager there are teams that would welcome him and his cap hit so moving him may be easier than people think. For crying out loud, the Leafs got rid of the much worse contract in Ritchie for a 3rd and got Lyubushkin out of it. So obviously it's not going to be as hard as people on here want it to be.


It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.
Nqutilus liked this.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:24 p.m.
#11
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Ritzy
It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.


Moving him in the offseason won't be that hard. The Leafs weren't the only team interested in him this past off season and one string of bad luck won't erase his career. Once the goalie market is figured this summer teams that miss out will turn to Mrazek to get him cheap. I doubt it'll cost the leafs to move him but the return will be essentially nothing.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:31 p.m.
#12
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Ritzy
It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.


You sir, are intelligent.

Honestly, I don't see why more Leafs fans aren't talking about this.
Garak and Ritzy liked this.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:33 p.m.
#13
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Moving him in the offseason won't be that hard. The Leafs weren't the only team interested in him this past off season and one string of bad luck won't erase his career. Once the goalie market is figured this summer teams that miss out will turn to Mrazek to get him cheap. I doubt it'll cost the leafs to move him but the return will be essentially nothing.


You still are going to have to pay to get rid of him. You can't just say "look how well he did in Carolina" when they have one of if not the best defensive cores in the league. I'd think it'd be smarter to buy him out and take a small L than to have to pay a decent pick.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:34 p.m.
#14
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: Nqutilus
You sir, are intelligent.

Honestly, I don't see why more Leafs fans aren't talking about this.


Fans want to shed the cap right this minute so they can overpay for a rental. Which is dumb on multiple fronts.

Logan's post above is probably the more realistic result (trade him in the offseason), buying him out would be a last resort.
Nqutilus and Logan_Ollivier liked this.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:35 p.m.
#15
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Ritzy
Fans want to shed the cap right this minute so they can overpay for a rental. Which is dumb on multiple fronts.

Logan's post above is probably the more realistic result (trade him in the offseason), buying him out would be a last resort.


Also doesn't help that Flower is unlikely to leave Chicago.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:35 p.m.
#16
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Nqutilus
You still are going to have to pay to get rid of him. You can't just say "look how well he did in Carolina" when they have one of if not the best defensive cores in the league. I'd think it'd be smarter to buy him out and take a small L than to have to pay a decent pick.


This is what fans want but it's just fickle. Most people love to see the Leafs get hurt and it's nonsense bias. The reality is Mrazek is better than he's looked this season. That doesn't erase the past. He is moveable in the off season.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:37 p.m.
#17
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
This is what fans want but it's just fickle. Most people love to see the Leafs get hurt and it's nonsense bias. The reality is Mrazek is better than he's looked this season. That doesn't erase the past. He is moveable in the off season.


He's moveable, but I doubt someone's gonna pay to get him (although I will say GMs can be... interesting)
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:50 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,878
Likes: 10,672
Quoting: Ritzy
It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.


It's not insane to say what the cost is. But it is insane to think Dubas would actually pay to do it.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:57 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 23
Quoting: Nqutilus
You sir, are intelligent.

Honestly, I don't see why more Leafs fans aren't talking about this.


They aren’t going to buy out Mrazek lol.
Mar. 18, 2022 at 12:57 p.m.
#20
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Rob88
They aren’t going to buy out Mrazek lol.


So you'll pay some decent assets to dump him? Why not just accept your L and move on?
Mar. 18, 2022 at 1:11 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 23
Edited Mar. 18, 2022 at 1:26 p.m.
Quoting: Nqutilus
So you'll pay some decent assets to dump him? Why not just accept your L and move on?


Imo, dead cap space over the next four years is the exact opposite thing Dubas will want for this team. These are our prime contending years, and we’ve been through this exercise several times now with other players. It’s hard enough creating quality depth with term in our bottom 6.

But honestly, this is a moot point anyway, because I think posters saying it’ll cost a 1st to move him are simply wrong. It’s a buy-low scenario not a cap dump. Theres just not enough data here to suggest Mrazek has lost his ability to play in the NHL, and there are plenty of teams looking for an answer between their pipes.

People get amnesia with this team and forget how hard this market is on some players. This team also hasn’t been stellar in front of their goalies on most nights, playing high octane offence. You don’t need to look much further than how Andersen and Mrazek have played for each team lol.

Just my opinion, let’s see how it unfolds!
Mar. 18, 2022 at 1:20 p.m.
#22
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Rob88
Imo, dead cap space over the next four years is the exact opposite thing Dubas will want for this team. These are our prime contending years, and we’ve been through this exercise several times now with other players. It’s hard enough creating quality depth with term in our bottom 6.

But honestly, this is a moot point anyway, because I think posters saying it’ll cost a 1st to move him are simply wrong. It’s a buy-low scenario not a cap dump. Theres just not enough data here to suggest Mrazek has lost his ability to play in the NHL, and there are plenty of teams looking for an answer between their pipes.

People get amnesia with this team and forget how hard this market is on some players. This team also hasn’t been stellar in front of their goalies on most nights, playing high octane offence.

Just my opinion, let’s see how it unfolds!


Well, we'll see. Who knows, lol?
Mar. 18, 2022 at 2:22 p.m.
#23
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Nqutilus
He's moveable, but I doubt someone's gonna pay to get him (although I will say GMs can be... interesting)


Petry is supposed to be worth a 1st and has been awful. But used to be good. Mrazek used to be good, GM's don't forget
Mar. 18, 2022 at 2:24 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 23
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Petry is supposed to be worth a 1st and has been awful. But used to be good. Mrazek used to be good, GM's don't forget



Exactly
Mar. 18, 2022 at 2:41 p.m.
#25
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Rob88
Exactly


Chiarot is terrible and was completely carried by Weber and still got a 1st while getting completely caved in all season. Manson hasn't been overly good for 3-4 seasons and has value. What fans think on here often is emotional and silly
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll