SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tomorrow

Created by: hunter4321
Team: 2021-22 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 20, 2022
Published: Mar. 20, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
As I suggested a few days back you can just put Richardson on waivers and just keep him in Calgary and now after he clears they can add 1.5 million in contracts
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Kulak, Brett ($925,000 retained)
MTL
  1. 2024 5th round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
Additional Details:
Not sure how this can work but I've seen this idea thrown around out there
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$70,162,500$0$0$11,337,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,950,000$1,950,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$0$0
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 20, 2022 at 4:55 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Bruins have absolutely no interest in that kind of swap. Debrusk is staying, and they aren’t taking on monahan.
Mar. 20, 2022 at 4:56 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 928
Likes: 182
Why trade for a dud Monahan when you can sign Krejci (and hope he clears waivers)?
Mar. 20, 2022 at 4:57 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Ichbinian
Why trade for a dud Monahan when you can sign Krejci (and hope he clears waivers)?


krejčí’s not coming back
Mar. 20, 2022 at 5:01 p.m.
#4
Leaf Fan Joke Here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 351
Likes: 109
If Dermott and Hamonic get 3rds then Kulak is a 2nd (Plus MTL Can retain 50%)
Mar. 20, 2022 at 5:01 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,581
Likes: 19,707
No interest in SeBrusk
Mar. 20, 2022 at 5:12 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Ichbinian
Why trade for a dud Monahan when you can sign Krejci (and hope he clears waivers)?


Sweeney confirmed that krejci will not be returning.
Mar. 20, 2022 at 5:15 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 930
with Lindholm extension, Bruins will almost certainly just be going for a rental at F. maybe someone cost-controlled. not an overpaid player
Mar. 20, 2022 at 5:28 p.m.
#8
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,544
Likes: 2,066
Treliving made a bit of an example of Kulak in 2018, then traded him for nothung. I can't see them trading for him again
Mar. 20, 2022 at 8:02 p.m.
#9
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,793
Likes: 1,259
Bruh, kulak is staying put if that's the return
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll