SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

swinny option 3

Created by: swinny
Team: 2017-18 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 24, 2017
Published: Apr. 29, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
2$2,500,000
3$3,250,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
2$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
1$1,750,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
TOR
    expansion pick with compensation
    VGK
    1. Fehr, Eric
    2. 2018 3rd round pick (SJS)
    2.
    NSH
    1. Soshnikov, Nikita
    2. 2018 2nd round pick (SJS)
    Additional Details:
    Nashville risks loosing Ellis in the expansion draft. Gotta think that they are going Subban, Josi and Ekholm. Be surprised if they weren't.

    Ellis for the Leafs provides a balanced game on the right side - solid two way performer. Really good fit here.

    Preds get a very solid forward propsect in Shoshnikov - has serious wheels and good hands, and most importantly expansion exempt. And since quality defensman don't come cheap, a 2nd rounder for good measure.
    3.
    CGY
    1. Marincin, Martin
    Additional Details:
    Realistically the stock has fallen on Shinkaruk; but I still like his size and is still only 22. The Leafs lack depth on the left size, and this is compounded by the impending free agency of JVR and Komorov. May not figure into the plans this year, but with some direction with the baby Leafs, could prove useful a year from now.

    Marincin for the Flames provides an inexpensive and very viable option for their bottom 6 that could fit long term.
    4.
    TOR
    1. 2019 5th round pick (CAR)
    CAR
    1. Lupul, Joffrey
    Additional Details:
    RFA rights to Garret Sparks

    Gotta think this one is self explanatory.
    5.
    TOR
      RFA Rights to Andre Burakovsky
      WSH
      1. 2018 1st round pick (TOR)
      Additional Details:
      Some might think this is a stretch.... hear me out.

      We all know that the Caps are going to be hard pressed in trying to keep that core together. Burakovsky is due a significant pay raise - albeit less some some others. My thinking is simple: if I am the Caps I would much sooner keep Kuznetsov, Orlov and one of Alzner, Shattenkirk or Oshie. Burkovsky bring a 3rd line guy who would see about $2.5-3 million on a bridge deal I just don't see int he cards; even if he is 22. You have to think the Caps are committed to winning a Cup during the Ovie era.....

      The leafs can afford to move the 1st - especially in a shallower draft than we have seen in the last few years. The point of this move is planning to find "that" left winger that can play with Matthews. My thought is he can.

      This also gives a little more depth and breadth to the left wing, which is by far the shallowest position in the organization. Burakovsky comes in, and gives the 2nd line some serious teeth as I would move JVR to that role.

      It's also insurance on JVR - with this being his final year under contract. If the Leafs cannot resign him for money that is going to make sense long term, they have someone that has a much stronger likelihood of filling those shoes than Zach Hyman or Josh Leivo (he, more in the short term)
      Buyouts
      Retained Salary Transactions
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2018
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the ARI
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the ANA
      2019
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the CAR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      2020
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the TOR
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$73,000,000$71,180,000$5,370,000$4,550,000$1,820,000
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      $4,250,000$4,250,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
      C
      UFA - 2
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RW
      UFA - 2
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 2
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      C
      UFA - 5
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RW
      UFA - 1
      $863,333$863,333
      RW
      UFA - 2
      $4,200,000$4,200,000
      C, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      $1,750,000$1,750,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 3
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 4
      $2,950,000$2,950,000
      RW, LW, C
      UFA - 1
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 2
      $5,300,000$5,300,000
      RW
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 3
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      LD
      UFA - 5
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      RD
      UFA - 2
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      $4,050,000$4,050,000
      LD
      UFA - 2
      $3,250,000$3,250,000
      RD
      UFA - 7
      $750,000$750,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      $1,750,000$1,750,000
      G
      UFA - 2
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      LD
      UFA - 3
      $1,450,000$1,450,000
      RD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:05 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2015
      Posts: 1,565
      Likes: 89
      Nashville will protect 4 forwards and 4 defenseman
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:06 p.m.
      #2
      Black Lives Matter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 29,923
      Likes: 4,651
      Quoting: LeafsFan
      Nashville will protect 4 forwards and 4 defenseman


      i disagree.
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:09 p.m.
      #3
      Leafs Rule
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 316
      Likes: 15
      You're not getting Ellis for so little. If you think they won't protect 4 d-men do the expansion draft thing and show me the SEVEN forwards they MUST hold onto. They don't have 7.
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:20 p.m.
      #4
      Leafs Rule
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 316
      Likes: 15
      Quoting: rangersandislesfan
      Quoting: LeafsFan
      Nashville will protect 4 forwards and 4 defenseman


      i disagree.


      You can disagree all you want, but go look at their forwards and show me 7 that they MUST protect that will also leave 2 available? You can't. It actually screws them to do that because they only have 8 in total that they can protect which means they will lose one as they can only really protect 6. Show me the 6 that they MUST protect.

      You should go and learn about something first before you do anything and come up with fantasy.
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:45 p.m.
      #5
      Lenny7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2017
      Posts: 13,291
      Likes: 11,051
      Not nearly enough for Ellis. They'll definitely be going 4-4-1 instead of 7-3-1. They don't have enough fwds that they'd be worried about losing.
      Marincin is a 7th dman who probably doesn't even make the Flames. No need to trade any sort of prospect for him, good or bad, as Calgary could get a similar player for free in FA this year.
      The Burakovsky trade seems like a stretch.
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:47 p.m.
      #6
      Leafs Rule
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 316
      Likes: 15
      Quoting: Lenny7
      Not nearly enough for Ellis. They'll definitely be going 4-4-1 instead of 7-3-1. They don't have enough fwds that they'd be worried about losing.
      Marincin is a 7th dman who probably doesn't even make the Flames. No need to trade any sort of prospect for him, good or bad, as Calgary could get a similar player for free in FA this year.
      The Burakovsky trade seems like a stretch.


      You're right about going the 4-4-1 route. It's funny how most people don't see it.
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:52 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2016
      Posts: 390
      Likes: 150
      Why would they give up a 3rd to get rid of fehr when they only obtained a 4th to take his contract? I wish they could get Ellis for that, however I don't see it happening!
      Apr. 29, 2017 at 3:56 p.m.
      #8
      Leafs Rule
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 316
      Likes: 15
      Quoting: aelliott10
      Why would they give up a 3rd to get rid of fehr when they only obtained a 4th to take his contract? I wish they could get Ellis for that, however I don't see it happening!


      coming from the guy who wants to keep Fehr for no reason, lol
      Apr. 30, 2017 at 11:46 a.m.
      #9
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,812
      Likes: 2,012
      Quoting: Dragongrave
      Quoting: Lenny7
      Not nearly enough for Ellis. They'll definitely be going 4-4-1 instead of 7-3-1. They don't have enough fwds that they'd be worried about losing.
      Marincin is a 7th dman who probably doesn't even make the Flames. No need to trade any sort of prospect for him, good or bad, as Calgary could get a similar player for free in FA this year.
      The Burakovsky trade seems like a stretch.


      You're right about going the 4-4-1 route. It's funny how most people don't see it.


      Oh I see the 4-4-1 scenario. Not that naïve. I just don't see Nashville letting Jarnkrok into the expansion draft on that sweetass deal. 30-40 points, still with top 6 capabilities on a $2 million hit? I don't see them giving up on that too easily. Especially for an organization that churns out defensemen like McDonalds churns out Big Macs.....

      Too little for Ellis? That may be more a function of player assessment. Shoshnikov has really good tools. Maybe Poile bites maybe he won't. Don't think I would not move up to Kapanen.

      Burakovsky...... I said it was a stretch, but cannot argue my logic.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll