Montreal does it in a millisecond. The jets tell you to take hike.

Please stop trolling, its annoying. PLD isn't that good. WPG's players aren't all worth McDavid.

It looks like you're the one trolling. Offering a tiny 2nd line winger for a young 1C. Take off the homer glasses

Ask everyone who they would rather between PLD and Caufield and I guarantee 99% of the people will say Caufield. The 1% are people like you disgustingly overvaluing your players.

Although I think that in the post, it was Danault and a 2nd for PLD, no caufield in there, if there was, the dude hella smoll brain, we already got our top 2 centers, wright (hopefully, not slaf) and suzuki, wright also might end up better than suzuki.

PLD had more goals, more points, played C, is a big force on the ice etc...and he is only 2 years older, both are young.

With this, why would you want Caufield over PLD?

Lol. Please stop trolling. You are definitely one of the 99% of Montreal fans that overvalues everything Montreal. Even though they are the worst team in hockey.

Caufield has played a season and a bit in the NHL. He has proven much more than PLD has in 5 and a bit.

is dubois even a 1c? career high 61 points in 5 season. would he slot as 2c aswell behing suzuki?

jets reject they need centers not useless tiny players,they have ehlers and connor for there number 1's

@Windjammer how many accounts do you need to prove your point?

Right same level as Suzuki. If Suzuki is a 1C so is Dubois.

Ok so do u agree Wright>PLD.

not saying either are, but its a legit question to ask in both case i believe.

I agree, PLD is a 1 C. However I think Caufield is better than PLD AND zuki

Worth mentioning too that Suzuki scored 60 points in a ****show of a mtl team this year, hm injuries this year? him and Caufield were damn near ppg when MSL got here. Wright most likely ends up being a better player than zuki, maybe a 30g 80 pts guy while zuki is 20 g and 70p.

I think Wright will be more of a 45 G 85 P. He will score.

Duby is his 2nd season still had more points as Caufield and more goals at that, playing C.

Heck, His first season he had more points too

You are so bias its unbelievable. Looking at the pts purely is kinda of bad. Caufield missed almost 20 games and only had 5 less points than Dubois

and played wing. He didnt have to worry about playing C

14 less games and only a 5 pts difference, Caufield was near a ppg so he'd end up with around 10-13 more points and 7 or 8 of them would be goals lmao 1st half he was on the 4th line too, Ducharme smoll brain.

PLD has top 6 potential. Caufield has elite potential. I'll put it like that

Why even offer this trade if your whole argument is that Caufield is better than PLD?

All this arguing could have been avoided.

I think there's a whole lot of overvaluing players on this sight. The issue with these discussions is ALWAYS the value of player(s) in a vacuum VS the value of player(s) in relation to the teams trading and/or acquiring. Dubois has tremendous value to the Jets and many fans hate reading every trade (usually sparked by speculation he won't be in Winnipeg long-term) that does little to address team needs or what they'd be losing in PLD. If I might ask, why do an ACGM at all, seeing as you consider Caufield the far superior player?? Is it just the idea of adding a home-town player, again??

More of a bust imo. Talk to me when he starts scoring like he is supposed to