SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

stackd 22-23

Created by: Tintin
Team: 2022-23 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 10, 2022
Published: Jun. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Ultimately I believe that trading for DeBrincat (or Fiala, Tkachuk etc) this off season would be a big mistake.
But that doesn't mean you can't make an agm about it.

Might do another post exploring the long term consequences of grabbing such a player.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,250,000
6$6,363,636
1$975,000
1$975,000
1$3,500,000
6$4,166,666
5$4,166,666
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Firkus, Jagger
3$925,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Puljujärvi, Jesse$4,166,666
2023 2nd round pick
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Tatar, Tomas
  2. 2022 1st round pick (NJD)
  3. 2023 1st round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
2023 is playoff protected.
Tatar to balance salary, will put up play befitting a middle sixer for a few months before Chicago flips him with retention at the deadline.
If it wasn't clear, we're assuming Chicago are more less tanking for 22-23.
2.
NJD
  1. Vanecek, Vitek [RFA Rights]
WSH
  1. Zacha, Pavel [RFA Rights]
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (NJD)
3.
VGK
  1. Smith, Ty
  2. Thompson, Tyce [RFA Rights]
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (NJD)
4.
NJD
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (VGK)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Suggested fair value.
VGK
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Kuokkanen, Janne
Additional Details:
Traded to whomever can make use of them.
5.
NJD
    Offersheeting Bulju.
    EDM
      2023 2nd rd pick.
      Buyouts
      Recapture Fees
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2022
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the VGK
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NYR
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the EDM
      Logo of the NYI
      Logo of the CBJ
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      2023
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      2024
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      Logo of the NJD
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$82,500,000$81,863,635$0$1,332,500$636,365
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $6,400,000$6,400,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      C, LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      C
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $6,363,636$6,363,636
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RW, LW
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
      RW, C
      RFA - 2
      $4,166,666$4,166,666
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $975,000$975,000
      C, LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $975,000$975,000
      RW
      RFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $3,166,667$3,166,667
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $9,000,000$9,000,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      $3,250,000$3,250,000
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $1,125,000$1,125,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $4,166,666$4,166,666
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $2,800,000$2,800,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $925,000$925,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      $4,166,666$4,166,666
      LD
      RFA - 3
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $975,000$975,000
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $4,125,000$4,125,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $825,000$825,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Taxi Squad
      Firkus, Jagger
      $925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $789,167$789,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
      LD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the New Jersey Devils
      $863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0)
      LW
      RFA - 2

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 9:25 a.m.
      #1
      FireStan
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2020
      Posts: 139
      Likes: 29
      not enough for debrincat
      SociallyHawkward and ChiHawk liked this.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 9:46 a.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: mac2033
      not enough for debrincat


      This is more than enough.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 9:49 a.m.
      #3
      Caps fan
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2022
      Posts: 337
      Likes: 124
      as a caps fan, ur paying vitek way too much
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 10:44 a.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 5,710
      Likes: 5,941
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      This is more than enough.


      No. It's not.
      ChiHawk liked this.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:06 a.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      This is more than enough.


      LMAO no it's not even close. Chicago will want a A prospect and a 1st to even get the conversation going. A prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy plus a 1st giving the Hawks at least 2 chances to end up with a player as valuable as Cat; a chance is not worth the same as someone who is proven elite.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:11 a.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2022
      Posts: 208
      Likes: 108
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      This is more than enough.


      Remove Tatar and insert Holtz and there is a conversation here.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:15 a.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      LMAO no it's not even close. Chicago will want a A prospect and a 1st to even get the conversation going. A prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy plus a 1st giving the Hawks at least 2 chances to end up with a player as valuable as Cat; a chance is not worth the same as someone who is proven elite.


      So you‘re telling me that with the 2OA pick you‘re not able to draft a „ prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy“? Maybe you should invest more into your amateur scouting then.

      2OA, 2023 1st + roster player (doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna) is more than enough get things started.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:16 a.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: Cincod1
      Remove Tatar and insert Holtz and there is a conversation here.


      Lol
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:26 a.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      So you‘re telling me that with the 2OA pick you‘re not able to draft a „ prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy“? Maybe you should invest more into your amateur scouting then.

      2OA, 2023 1st + roster player (doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna) is more than enough get things started.


      Cat is proven elite franchise player. A CHANCE at getting one #2 OA is not equal to a proven player. Hawks are going to rightfully so want a couple chances to hit on a franchise player. Do I really need to go through all the failed top 5 picks over the years to demonstrate even the best scouts get it wrong? That's why they aren't going to trade Cat for just once lucky chance they end up with a player as good as Cat.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:34 a.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      Cat is proven elite franchise player. A CHANCE at getting one #2 OA is not equal to a proven player. Hawks are going to rightfully so want a couple chances to hit on a franchise player. Do I really need to go through all the failed top 5 picks over the years to demonstrate even the best scouts get it wrong? That's why they aren't going to trade Cat for just once lucky chance they end up with a player as good as Cat.


      So, now I'm curious. Give me then a package including a "proven" player that has more value than this deal and that also makes sense for the opposing team. Other than that, what do you think how many deals start with high expectations and have to be settled for lesser value because you just don't always get what you wish for.

      I'm pretty sure if Debrincat is traded within the next ouple of months it won't be for a more valuable package than this.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:48 a.m.
      #11
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      So, now I'm curious. Give me then a package including a "proven" player that has more value than this deal and that also makes sense for the opposing team. Other than that, what do you think how many deals start with high expectations and have to be settled for lesser value because you just don't always get what you wish for.

      I'm pretty sure if Debrincat is traded within the next ouple of months it won't be for a more valuable package than this.


      You realize adding Tatar has little to no value unless the Hawks can retain half his salary and flip him at the TDL? Tatar is coming off a pretty bad season in which he certainly didn't play like a $5.3M player.

      Eichel; and Cat isn't headed for a major surgery with a unkown long term prognosis, isn't a year older, isn't at odds with his team and the team being forced to trade him, isn't being traded in season where very few teams can do cap gymnastics to fit in $10M, isn't carrying a $10M cap hit and isn't a UFA in 4 years. Start with that trade and realize Cat will have more interest from a lot more teams given the timing, being a RFA in another year, lower cap hit, and never been injured and not heading for a major surgery and you'll understand why he probably gets more.

      I promise, no team in their right mind would take take Nemec or Cooley for Cat, a 31 year old 1 year rental that carries a $5.3M cap hit coming off a 30 point season, and another 1st that will end up being mid to late given the team you put together here...zero chance any team trades a elite young player for that.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:48 a.m.
      #12
      VGKNation702
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2019
      Posts: 5,132
      Likes: 1,640
      Lol not close for patches and Hague
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 11:56 a.m.
      #13
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      You realize adding Tatar has little to no value unless the Hawks can retain half his salary and flip him at the TDL? Tatar is coming off a pretty bad season in which he certainly didn't play like a $5.3M player.

      Eichel; and Cat isn't headed for a major surgery with a unkown long term prognosis, isn't a year older, isn't at odds with his team and the team being forced to trade him, isn't being traded in season where very few teams can do cap gymnastics to fit in $10M, isn't carrying a $10M cap hit and isn't a UFA in 4 years. Start with that trade and realize Cat will have more interest from a lot more teams given the timing, being a RFA in another year, lower cap hit, and never been injured and not heading for a major surgery and you'll understand why he probably gets more.

      I promise, no team in their right mind would take take Nemec or Cooley for Cat, a 31 year old 1 year rental that carries a $5.3M cap hit coming off a 30 point season, and another 1st that will end up being mid to late given the team you put together here...zero chance any team trades a elite young player for that.


      So thanks for confirming me by not answering my question. Well done.

      Didn‘t I write „doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna“? I sure did. So instead of ranting about a serviceable middle six player (who does have a lower cap hit btw) give me some other options the Blackhawks could be interested in from out current roster.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 12:06 p.m.
      #14
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      So thanks for confirming me by not answering my question. Well done.

      Didn‘t I write „doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna“? I sure did. So instead of ranting about a serviceable middle six player (who does have a lower cap hit btw) give me some other options the Blackhawks could be interested in from out current roster.


      It's going to take Holtz and a 1st to get the Hawks interested. Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value. Tatar is only worth what a team will pay for him at the deadline and he's not worth his contract...30 point players grow on trees in the league...a 2nd rounder at best.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 12:09 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      It's going to take Holtz and a 1st to get the Hawks interested. Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value. Tatar is only worth what a team will pay for him at the deadline and he's not worth his contract...30 point players grow on trees in the league...a 2nd rounder at best.


      "Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value." and then you want Holtz and a 1st? Dude.. I'm sorry but I can't help you.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
      #16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      "Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value." and then you want Holtz and a 1st? Dude.. I'm sorry but I can't help you.


      Holtz is proven elite talent? He showed to be a ppg player in the AHL but as we all know, that often doesn't translate to the NHL. Why would the Hawks trade Cat for the #2 this draft year or Holtz? It would be absolutely crazy for them to roll the dice and think they have a lock of getting another Cat with the Holtz or the #2 thus making it senseless to move a 24 year old player for. Keep in mind, when Cat was Holtz's age he put up 28 goals in the NHL.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 12:30 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      Holtz is proven elite talent? He showed to be a ppg player in the AHL but as we all know, that often doesn't translate to the NHL. Why would the Hawks trade Cat for the #2 this draft year or Holtz? It would be absolutely crazy for them to roll the dice and think they have a lock of getting another Cat with the Holtz or the #2 thus making it senseless to move a 24 year old player for. Keep in mind, when Cat was Holtz's age he put up 28 goals in the NHL.


      Dude.. you want Holtz included in the deal - not me 😂
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 12:33 p.m.
      #18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      Dude.. you want Holtz included in the deal - not me 😂


      I'm saying holtz and a 1st to get the conversation started. It gives the Hawks a couple darts to throw hoping they hit a bullseye with one or the other in return for a proven elite level player. Not sure what you're laughing at what logic you're trying to convey
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 12:38 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2019
      Posts: 518
      Likes: 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      I'm saying holtz and a 1st to get the conversation started. It gives the Hawks a couple darts to throw hoping they hit a bullseye with one or the other in return for a proven elite level player. Not sure what you're laughing at what logic you're trying to convey


      Thanks for the flowers - I can give them right back to you.

      Just be prepared to be disappointed when you see the return.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 1:03 p.m.
      #20
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      Thanks for the flowers - I can give them right back to you.

      Just be prepared to be disappointed when you see the return.


      LMAO okay smart ass

      I'm not going to be disappointed as it is highly unlikely he is traded in the next few months and if a team pries him away, it's going to be a king's ransom
      sh51_aa liked this.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 5:14 p.m.
      #21
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2022
      Posts: 208
      Likes: 108
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      Lol


      Maybe a little more even, add Holtz, remove Tuna and Hawks kick in Murphy.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 5:18 p.m.
      #22
      Thread Starter
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2020
      Posts: 4,911
      Likes: 4,269
      Quoting: VGKNation702
      Lol not close for patches and Hague


      One 1st rd pedigree prospect, one b level prospect, a 2nd rd pick and 7m+ ni cap relief for a 17 man roster with 200k cap space isn't enough?

      Fine I guess I'll just offersheet Hague then.
      Goodluck matching.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 5:31 p.m.
      #23
      Thread Starter
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2020
      Posts: 4,911
      Likes: 4,269
      Quoting: Cincod1
      Maybe a little more even, add Holtz, remove Tuna and Hawks kick in Murphy.


      Devils have no need for Murphy.
      In my mind it should be either pick#2 ++ or Holtz++ , I choose the former.

      Quoting: mac2033
      not enough for debrincat


      I think it is.
      Not that I'd want the Devils to do my suggested trade anyways.

      Quoting: BackstromIsTheGoat
      as a caps fan, ur paying vitek way too much


      Really? Always felt he was kinda underrated, looked good pretty much every time I've watched him and last seasons stats are encouraging.

      Quoting: SociallyHawkward
      No. It's not.


      Quoting: ChiHawk
      LMAO no it's not even close. Chicago will want a A prospect and a 1st to even get the conversation going. A prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy plus a 1st giving the Hawks at least 2 chances to end up with a player as valuable as Cat; a chance is not worth the same as someone who is proven elite.


      That's not how it works when players like DeBrincat are made available.
      I think someone said the same thing but a rebuilding / tanking team doesn't get a franchise player back.
      They get a combination of blue chip prospects and picks.
      Hawks get the chance to draft Cooley or Slafkovsky here along with another pick in what looks to be a fantastic 2023 draft class + whatever return they could swing for Tatar.
      The return I suggested is plenty for DeBrincat, not that I'd actually want the Devils to go through with it irl.

      Quoting: Cincod1
      Remove Tatar and insert Holtz and there is a conversation here.


      It's either Holtz++ or the #2 pick++.
      Hawks are certainly not getting both Holtz and #2.
      Jun. 10, 2022 at 6:26 p.m.
      #24
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2017
      Posts: 19,219
      Likes: 9,585
      Quoting: Tintin
      Devils have no need for Murphy.
      In my mind it should be either pick#2 ++ or Holtz++ , I choose the former.



      I think it is.
      Not that I'd want the Devils to do my suggested trade anyways.



      Really? Always felt he was kinda underrated, looked good pretty much every time I've watched him and last seasons stats are encouraging.





      That's not how it works when players like DeBrincat are made available.
      I think someone said the same thing but a rebuilding / tanking team doesn't get a franchise player back.
      They get a combination of blue chip prospects and picks.
      Hawks get the chance to draft Cooley or Slafkovsky here along with another pick in what looks to be a fantastic 2023 draft class + whatever return they could swing for Tatar.
      The return I suggested is plenty for DeBrincat, not that I'd actually want the Devils to go through with it irl.



      It's either Holtz++ or the #2 pick++.
      Hawks are certainly not getting both Holtz and #2.


      Holtz and the 2023 1st is realistic IMO. Hawks are going to want a couple chances to develop a potential franchise player since they are giving up an elite one unless the Hawks are that high on Cooley or Nemec then fair enough.
      Aug. 15, 2022 at 4:08 a.m.
      #25
      Thread Starter
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2020
      Posts: 4,911
      Likes: 4,269
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      Holtz and the 2023 1st is realistic IMO. Hawks are going to want a couple chances to develop a potential franchise player since they are giving up an elite one unless the Hawks are that high on Cooley or Nemec then fair enough.


      Quoting: Cincod1
      Maybe a little more even, add Holtz, remove Tuna and Hawks kick in Murphy.


      Quoting: SociallyHawkward
      No. It's not.


      Quoting: mac2033
      not enough for debrincat


      Went through some older AGMs and came across these gems.
      What a goldmine haha.
      CD282 liked this.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll