SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gibson

Created by: Napparific
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 13, 2022
Published: Jun. 13, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,750,000
1$1,750,000
1$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$2,400,000
Trades
1.
TOR
    Future considerations
    ARI
    1. Holl, Justin
    2.
    TOR
    1. Comtois, Maxime ($1,000,000 retained)
    2. Gibson, John
    ANA
    1. Kerfoot, Alexander
    2. Knies, Matthew [Reserve List]
    3. Mrázek, Petr
    4. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
    Additional Details:
    I think Kerfoot pushes this deal over the top, might be a slight overpay from Toronto given how promising Knies is and how average Gibson has been for 3 years but if you're the leafs you're betting in a return to form. Anaheim can really stock the cupboards with this haul and get a cost-controlled roster player in Kerfoot in exchange for taking Mrazek
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the TOR
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$82,500,000$82,477,283$212,500$0$22,717
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Bunting, Michael
    $950,000$950,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Matthews, Auston
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Nylander, William
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Waivers ExemptRobertson, Nicholas
    $796,667$796,667
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Tavares, John
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Marner, Mitchell
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Engvall, Pierre
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Kämpf, David
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Anderson, Joey
    $750,000$750,000
    RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    Comtois, Maxime
    $1,037,500$1,037,500
    LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Waivers ExemptAbruzzese, Nick
    $850,000$850,000
    LW, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Simmonds, Wayne
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Rielly, Morgan
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Brodie, TJ
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    Gibson, John
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Muzzin, Jake
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Liljegren, Timothy
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Sandin, Rasmus
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Holtby, Braden
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    G
    UFA
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Giordano, Mark
    $800,000$800,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    Lyubushkin, Ilya
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 3:40 p.m.
    #1
    Lenny7
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 3:40 p.m.
    #2
    OldNYIfan
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,383
    Likes: 25,289
    Kerfoot and Mrazek push the deal under water.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
    #3
    BlackieO
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 55
    Likes: 8
    Why is it always Kerfoot?....every deal on this site. tears of joy
    OldNYIfan and CD282 liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 3:53 p.m.
    #4
    KPasty
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 1,140
    Likes: 359
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Kerfoot and Mrazek push the deal under water.


    Kerfoot just put up 50 points on a great contract. In what way does he push it under water? Mrazek 100% agree but come on... good team or not, Kerfoot still put up points moving throughout the lineup.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 4:29 p.m.
    #5
    OldNYIfan
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,383
    Likes: 25,289
    Quoting: KPasty
    Kerfoot just put up 50 points on a great contract. In what way does he push it under water? Mrazek 100% agree but come on... good team or not, Kerfoot still put up points moving throughout the lineup.


    Kerfoot is a rental. By definition, any rental involved in a trade for players with 4 and 5 years' term is a throw-in. He pushes the deal under the surface because he's nowhere near the value of Comtois. Take Comtois out and I wouldn't say Kerfoot pushes the deal under water, just Mrazek.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 4:29 p.m.
    #6
    Napparific
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 232
    Likes: 44
    Quoting: Lenny7
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.


    50 point guy, cost controlled, owed
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 4:30 p.m.
    #7
    Napparific
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 232
    Likes: 44
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Kerfoot is a rental. By definition, any rental involved in a trade for players with 4 and 5 years' term is a throw-in. He pushes the deal under the surface because he's nowhere near the value of Comtois. Take Comtois out and I wouldn't say Kerfoot pushes the deal under water, just Mrazek.


    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?
    Lenny7 liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 4:31 p.m.
    #8
    Napparific
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 232
    Likes: 44
    Quoting: Lenny7
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.


    So the ducks just want to ice a team of scrubs forever?
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
    #9
    OldNYIfan
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 40,383
    Likes: 25,289
    Quoting: Napparific
    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?


    Only you would construe my comment as equating Kerfoot with Matthews.

    Once again, Yes, bottom-6 rental forwards are throw-ins in deals involving players with 4 or 5 years' term. That's how hockey works.
    Lenny7 liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 5:35 p.m.
    #10
    Lenny7
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: Napparific
    So the ducks just want to ice a team of scrubs forever?


    Does 1 year of Kerfoot change the outcome in Anaheim?
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 5:36 p.m.
    #11
    Lenny7
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: Napparific
    50 point guy, cost controlled, owed


    For one year. Heck, if I was a contending team I’d be all over him, which begs the question of why Leafers have such a hard on to move him.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 5:36 p.m.
    #12
    Lenny7
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: Napparific
    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?


    Rental to contender-good.
    Rental to rebuilding team-Very, very dumb.
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    Jun. 13, 2022 at 5:49 p.m.
    #13
    CD282
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,050
    Likes: 7,752
    Quoting: BlackieO
    Why is it always Kerfoot?....every deal on this site. tears of joy


    Because nobody is touching the Tavares contract?
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll