SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My attempt at a Patrick Kane trade

Created by: nintendofan721
Team: 2022-23 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 10, 2022
Published: Aug. 10, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Would this work? And we can dump Gardiner once Patches is ready to return.
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Kane, Patrick
1$2,625,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Kane, Patrick ($5,250,000 retained)
CHI
  1. Bear, Ethan
  2. Gunler, Noel
  3. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
  4. 2024 4th round pick (CAR)
2.
CAR
ARI
  1. Kane, Patrick
  2. 2023 6th round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
25% retention
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CAR
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2025
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$78,830,250$112,500$500,000$3,669,750
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RW
RFA - 2
Kane, Patrick
$2,625,000$2,625,000
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$4,820,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:06 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 3,044
Starting to think Pacioretty was injured this whole time and that’s why he was traded for nothing. As far as the trade I have no idea how much 1 year of Kane costs. But ideally you get Chicago to take Gardiner so they don’t have to worry about that down the line.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:07 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
I had a similar post. Think value is in ballpark depending on when trade is done. Might as well swap Gardiner with Bear and up the pick. Retention pick might need to be a bit higher with Yotes as well.

Think there’s a decent chance this offer gets beat but Kane also has a lot of control over where he goes. So if he wants to come to Canes for a cup shot or only wants to go to a couple of teams maybe that makes this the best offer.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:09 p.m.
#3
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Chicago deserves much more than that for giving up a great player at 25%
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:09 p.m.
#4
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,346
Likes: 4,535
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Starting to think Pacioretty was injured this whole time and that’s why he was traded for nothing. As far as the trade I have no idea how much 1 year of Kane costs. But ideally you get Chicago to take Gardiner so they don’t have to worry about that down the line.


He should be back in at least 3 months if Carolina is lucky
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:09 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Starting to think Pacioretty was injured this whole time and that’s why he was traded for nothing. As far as the trade I have no idea how much 1 year of Kane costs. But ideally you get Chicago to take Gardiner so they don’t have to worry about that down the line.


Believe it genuinely happened yesterday. I don’t have proof that I can share and it’s certainly a possibility but based on what I’ve heard it was a freak occurrence.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:10 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: IconicHawk
He should be back in at least 3 months if Carolina is lucky

High level projection is 6 months right now but wouldn’t be surprised if it was longer than that given the severity
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:11 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: IconicHawk
He should be back in at least 3 months if Carolina is lucky


It's an achilies tear. That's minimum 6 months
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:11 p.m.
#8
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
This is the deal I’d want:

Gardiner
Ryan Suzuki
2023 1st
2024 2nd

Then you have to pay AZ more than a lousy 6th round pick to eat 2.75 million in salary
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:11 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Starting to think Pacioretty was injured this whole time and that’s why he was traded for nothing. As far as the trade I have no idea how much 1 year of Kane costs. But ideally you get Chicago to take Gardiner so they don’t have to worry about that down the line.


He was on the ice earlier this month, and he wouldn't be skating with a torn achillies during the summer.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: ReginaSask
This is the deal I’d want:

Gardiner
Ryan Suzuki
2023 1st
2024 2nd

Then you have to pay AZ more than a lousy 6th round pick to eat 2.75 million in salary


See... here's the thing. I don't think Carolina would have to pay it. Look at the Domi trade. Carolina knew Columbus wanted to move Domi for anything and Columbus paid for the retention.

I think this is a similar position. No contender that Kane is going to waive for has the cap to trade for him at 50%. So if Chicago wants that kind of return for him, they need to either pay for the retention or take back more cap than they give out. Just my thoughts. Might be entirely wrong, but there's a precedent for this as it is.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:17 p.m.
#11
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,346
Likes: 4,535
Quoting: Caniac2000
It's an achilies tear. That's minimum 6 months


It said 3-6 months
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:18 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: IconicHawk
It said 3-6 months


Don Waddell, President and General Manager of the National Hockey League's Carolina Hurricanes, today announced that forward Max Pacioretty will undergo surgery to repair a torn Achilles. The procedure will be performed by Dr. Kevin Logel at Raleigh Orthopaedic on Wednesday. Pacioretty's expected recovery time is six months.

It said 6 months. Nothing about 3 months
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:19 p.m.
#13
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Quoting: Caniac2000
See... here's the thing. I don't think Carolina would have to pay it. Look at the Domi trade. Carolina knew Columbus wanted to move Domi for anything and Columbus paid for the retention.

I think this is a similar position. No contender that Kane is going to waive for has the cap to trade for him at 50%. So if Chicago wants that kind of return for him, they need to either pay for the retention or take back more cap than they give out. Just my thoughts. Might be entirely wrong, but there's a precedent for this as it is.


Max Domi is a footnote. Kane is a Hall of Famer. That’s a really bad comparison. Chicago is retaining 5.25 million AND taking on a useless contract like Gardiner for another 4 million. You better be giving them something back
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:22 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: ReginaSask
Max Domi is a footnote. Kane is a Hall of Famer. That’s a really bad comparison. Chicago is retaining 5.25 million AND taking on a useless contract like Gardiner for another 4 million. You better be giving them something back


You're the one compairing the players. Not the money. Money doesn't care if you're a hall of famer or a no body. If Chicago want that kind of return for him instead of seeing him walk away in free agency because he won't want to sit through a rebuild, they will need to move him. Everyone knows that. Toews already basically came out in the Athletic and said he wants out. Kane is supposedly in a similar boat. Kane's NMC means he has to waive and you can't dump him to just anyone. If you want a good return for him, you're likely going to need a 3 team trade. With that said, if you want that kind of return, you're likely going to see Chicago being the team that pays for the secondary retention. Who cares if Chicago give up a 3rd for some extra retention when they get a 1st + 2nd + prospect? That's my point. Trying to act like it isn't possible is just not smart.

And Chicago isn't the one taking Gardiner on here, who isn't a useless player by any means.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:28 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: ReginaSask
This is the deal I’d want:

Gardiner
Ryan Suzuki
2023 1st
2024 2nd

Then you have to pay AZ more than a lousy 6th round pick to eat 2.75 million in salary


That’s all you’d want? That’s a worse offer imo and helps the Canes more. Bear and Gunler are much more valuable than Gardiner and Suzuki. The 4 to a 2 doesn’t make up for that but as a canes fan I’d gladly accept.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:29 p.m.
#16
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Quoting: Caniac2000
You're the one compairing the players. Not the money. Money doesn't care if you're a hall of famer or a no body. If Chicago want that kind of return for him instead of seeing him walk away in free agency because he won't want to sit through a rebuild, they will need to move him. Everyone knows that. Toews already basically came out in the Athletic and said he wants out. Kane is supposedly in a similar boat. Kane's NMC means he has to waive and you can't dump him to just anyone. If you want a good return for him, you're likely going to need a 3 team trade. With that said, if you want that kind of return, you're likely going to see Chicago being the team that pays for the secondary retention. Who cares if Chicago give up a 3rd for some extra retention when they get a 1st + 2nd + prospect? That's my point. Trying to act like it isn't possible is just not smart.

And Chicago isn't the one taking Gardiner on here, who isn't a useless player by any means.


Then let him walk. It’s better than getting junk like that offer above. Bear is not any good. That 1st will result in an average player at best and a 4th? It’s insulting and I’d let him play the last year in Chicago before being slapped in the face.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:31 p.m.
#17
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Quoting: vikhodush
That’s all you’d want? That’s a worse offer imo and helps the Canes more. Bear and Gunler are much more valuable than Gardiner and Suzuki. The 4 to a 2 doesn’t make up for that but as a canes fan I’d gladly accept.


Bear sucks and Gunler is a nobody prospect. Suzuki isn’t anything special and Gardiner isn’t anything either. I’d want a 2nd over a 4th. A 4th rounder is usually a nobody. At least a 2nd gives you a chance at an NHLer
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:39 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: ReginaSask
Bear sucks and Gunler is a nobody prospect. Suzuki isn’t anything special and Gardiner isn’t anything either. I’d want a 2nd over a 4th. A 4th rounder is usually a nobody. At least a 2nd gives you a chance at an NHLer


Like I said, Canes gladly accept. Bear has more value than Gardiner. He may not have a ton of value but could likely be moved for a mid to late pick whereas Gardiner would be a cap dump. Gunler is a much better prospect than Suzuki at this stage of their careers unless you’re solely looking at where they were initially dragged. He’s probably a B/B+ prospect whereas Suzuki is maybe a C+. A lot of that has been driven by unfortunate injuries but they still happened.

Either way, gladly accept your counter.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:44 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: ReginaSask
Bear sucks and Gunler is a nobody prospect. Suzuki isn’t anything special and Gardiner isn’t anything either. I’d want a 2nd over a 4th. A 4th rounder is usually a nobody. At least a 2nd gives you a chance at an NHLer


Did you really just call Noel Gunler a nobody prospect? Gunler is a better prospect than Suzuki. At this point, you have proven you don't know the Canes farm system. Stop it.
vikhodush and nintendofan721 liked this.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 12:59 p.m.
#20
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Quoting: Caniac2000
Did you really just call Noel Gunler a nobody prospect? Gunler is a better prospect than Suzuki. At this point, you have proven you don't know the Canes farm system. Stop it.


I don’t care about your farm system. Picks matter. Both of those players will be forgotten nobodies in a few years time. You people here all act like your favourite prospect is going to dominate the league. Most of them are footnotes and nothing more
Aug. 10, 2022 at 1:01 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 5,078
Quoting: ReginaSask
I don’t care about your farm system. Picks matter. Both of those players will be forgotten nobodies in a few years time. You people here all act like your favourite prospect is going to dominate the league. Most of them are footnotes and nothing more


Whatever you say. I'm sure 2nd round pick that didn't come straight into the NHL sebastian Aho is a footnote. Or Seth Jarvis is a nobody. Jaccob Slavin 4th rounder is a no body. Brett Pesce 3rd rounder is a no one. Absolutely no ones. I'm sure of it. Ignore the fact that most experts have the Canes prospect pool at #2 in terms of prospects projected to make the NHL without a clear top prospect, but cool buddy. Whatever you say.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 1:03 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: ReginaSask
I don’t care about your farm system. Picks matter. Both of those players will be forgotten nobodies in a few years time. You people here all act like your favourite prospect is going to dominate the league. Most of them are footnotes and nothing more


This doesn’t make a ton of sense. Picks turn into prospects..would think you’d want the better prospect regardless of whether you care about another teams farm team.

Especially for CHI fans right now they should care about other teams farm systems since it’s likely they’ll be moving some of their NHL talent for those very prospects.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 1:24 p.m.
#23
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Quoting: vikhodush
This doesn’t make a ton of sense. Picks turn into prospects..would think you’d want the better prospect regardless of whether you care about another teams farm team.

Especially for CHI fans right now they should care about other teams farm systems since it’s likely they’ll be moving some of their NHL talent for those very prospects.


Teams want to pick their own players, hence why draft picks mean more than prospects.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 1:30 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Quoting: ReginaSask
Teams want to pick their own players, hence why draft picks mean more than prospects.


So teams don’t want good prospects if they can get a late second rounder instead? I agree that picks are valuable but saying prospects that are highly rated aren’t valuable because their own team didn’t draft them is an overly simplistic take.
Aug. 10, 2022 at 1:30 p.m.
#25
Dave Keon Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 380
Likes: 121
Quoting: Caniac2000
Whatever you say. I'm sure 2nd round pick that didn't come straight into the NHL sebastian Aho is a footnote. Or Seth Jarvis is a nobody. Jaccob Slavin 4th rounder is a no body. Brett Pesce 3rd rounder is a no one. Absolutely no ones. I'm sure of it. Ignore the fact that most experts have the Canes prospect pool at #2 in terms of prospects projected to make the NHL without a clear top prospect, but cool buddy. Whatever you say.


You just picked your best players you drafted. All teams draft at least some good players. There’s nothing special about drafting good players. Cup winning teams draft a core and build around that core with trades or free agents most of the time. Look at how many players Colorado had that they didn’t draft
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll